Response to Thyer's “Evidence-Based Practice or Evidence-Guided Practice”

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dewey

(1956). The school and society & The child and the curriculum. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published in 1902).

Gitterman

, & Knight

(2013). Evidence-guided practice: Integrating the science and art of social work. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 94(2), 70–78. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.4282

Harris

(1998). Scientific management, bureau professionalism, new managerialism: The labour process of state social work. British Journal of Social Work, 28, 839–862.

Patterson

(2002, May 19). The last sociologist. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/19/opinion/the-last-sociologist.html.

Smyth

K. F.

, & Schorr

L. B.

(2009, January). A lot to lose: A call to rethink what constitutes “evidence” in finding social interventions that work [Malcolm Wiener Center for Social Policy Working Paper Series]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School of Government. Retrieved from http://www.hks.harvard.edu/ocpa/pdf/A%20Lot%20to%20Lose%20final.pdf.

Thyer

(2013). Evidence-based practice or evidence-guided practice: A rose by any other name would smell as sweet [Invited response to Gitterman & Knight's “Evidence-guided practice”]. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 94(2), 79–84. doi:1350-10.1606/1044-3894.4283

Webb

S. A.

(2001). Some consideration on the validity of evidence-based practice. British Journal of Social Work, 31(1), 57–79. doi:10.1093/bjsw/31.1.57