Evidence-Based Practice or Evidence-Guided Practice: A Rose by Any Other Name Would Smell as Sweet [Invited Response to Gitterman & Knight's “Evidence-Guided Practice”]

Abstract

Gitterman and Knight (2013) expand upon the original model of evidence-based practice (EBP) by proposing an approach they label evidence-guided practice (EGP). They justify this by highlighting some supposed limitations of the original EBP model and by presenting some additional features to amend EBP into EGP. I attempt to show that the limitations they say characterize EBP are not actually a part of the real EBP model and are based upon either a misreading of the EBP literature, or by overlooking some of the features of EBP. I also try to demonstrate that most of the add-on elements to EBP they propose to label EGB are actually already present in the original model of EBP. One of their add-ons, an increased reliance upon formal theory as evidence, in addition to empirical research, seems to me a retrograde step and will perpetuate the harmful influence of some aspects of theory in social work practice. However, I judge their EGP model to be an improvement upon current social work practice, which largely tends to ignore empirical research findings to assist in decision making.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bogenschneider

, & Corbett

T. J.

(2010). Evidence-based policymaking. New York, NY: Routledge.

Boruch

(2012). Deploying randomized field experiments in the service of evidence-based crime policy. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8, 331–341.

Bronson

D. E.

(2009). Critically appraising studies for evidence-based practice. In Roberts

A. R.

(Ed.), Social workers’ desk reference (2nd ed.; pp. 1137–1141). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Drisko

J. W.

, & Simmons

B. M.

(2012). The evidence-based for psychodynamic psychotherapy. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 82, 374–400.

Gambrill

(1999). Evidence-based practice: An alternative to authority-based practice. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 80, 341-350. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.1214

Gambrill

(2010). Evidence-informed practice: Antidote to propaganda in the helping profession. Research on Social Work Practice, 20, 302–320.

Gambrill

, & Gibbs

(2009). Developing well-structured questions for evidence-informed practice. In Roberts

A. R.

(Ed.), Social workers’ desk reference (2nd ed.; pp. 1120–1126). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Gitterman

, & Knight

(2013). Evidence-guided practice: Integrating the science and art of social work. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 94(2), 70–78. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.4282

Guyatt

, & Rennie

(Eds.). (2002). Users’ guides to the medical literature: Essentials of evidence-based clinical practice. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association.

10.

Jayaratne

, & Levy

R. L.

(1979). Empirical clinical practice. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

11.

Roseborough

D. J.

, McLeod

J. T.

, & Bradshaw

W. H.

(2012). Psychodynamic psychotherapy: A quantitative, longitudinal perspective. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 54–67.

12.

Rubin

, & Parrish

(2009). Locating credible studies for evidence-based practice. In Roberts

A. R.

(Ed.), Social workers’ desk reference (2nd ed.; pp. 1127–1136). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

13.

Sackett

D. L.

, Straus

S. E.

, Richardson

W. S.

, Rosenberg

, & Haynes

R. B.

(2000). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach it (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone.

14.

Shlonsky

(2009). Evidence-based practice in social work education. In Roberts

A. R.

(Ed.), Social workers’ desk reference (2nd ed.; pp. 1169–1176). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

15.

Straus

S. E.

, Glasziou

, Richardson

W. S.

, & Haynes

R. B.

(2011). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach it (4th ed.). New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone.

16.

Thyer

B. A.

(2002). The role of theory in research on social work practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 9–25.

17.

Thyer

B. A.

(2003). Social work should help develop interdisciplinary evidence-based practice guidelines, not discipline-specific ones. In Rosen

& Proctor

E. K.

(Eds.), Developing practice guidelines for social work intervention: Issues, methods, and research agenda (pp. 128–139). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

18.

Thyer

B. A.

(2012). The potentially harmful effects of theory in social work. In Thyer

B. A.

, Dulmus

C. N.

, & Sowers

K. M.

(Eds.), Human behavior in the social environment: Theories for social work practice (pp. 459–487). New York, NY: Wiley.

19.

Thyer

B. A.

, & Myers

L. L.

(2011). The quest for evidence-based practice: A view from the United States. Journal of Social Work, 11, 8–25.

20.

Thyer

B. A.

, & Pignotti

(2011). Evidence-based practices do not exist. Clinical Social Work Journal, 39, 328–333.

21.

Vanlandingham

G. R.

, & Drake

E. K.

(2012). Results first: Using evidence-based policy models in state policymaking. Public Performance and Management Review, 35, 550–563.