Domestic violence can have a negative effect on multiple areas of a woman's life. While much focus has been on criminal legal interventions for domestic violence, civil legal services can provide a unique constellation of responses to the needs of women who experience domestic violence, which may be unfamiliar to many social workers. Civil legal services can greatly improve a woman's circumstances when targeting material needs such as housing, employment, and economic conditions. This article describes the differences in focus and impact of criminal and civil legal interventions for domestic violence, provides an in-depth illustration of how civil legal services can address a myriad of needs for women who experience domestic violence, and addresses the role social workers can play in assisting clients in the civil legal process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbelL. K., & RettigM. (2006). State statutes providing for a right to counsel in civil cases. Clearinghouse Review Journal of Poverty Law and Policy, July-August, 245-270.
2.
AdamsB. S. (2005). “Unbundled legal services”: A solution to the problem caused by pro se litigation in Massachusetts's civil courts. New England Law Review, 40, 303–349.
3.
AllenN. E., BybeeD. I., & SullivanC. M. (2004). Battered women's multitude of needs: Evidence supporting the need for comprehensive advocacy. Violence Against Women, 10, 1015–1035.
4.
BakerC. K., CookS. L., & NorrisF. H. (2003). Domestic violence and housing problems a contextual analysis of women's help-seeking, received informal support, and formal system response. Violence Against Women, 9, 754–783.
5.
BakerC. K., BillhardtK. A., WarrenJ., RollinsC., & GlassN. E. (2010). Domestic violence, housing instability, and homelessness: A review of housing policies and program practices for meeting the needs of survivors. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 430–439.
6.
BalosB. (2006). Domestic violence matters: The case for appointed counsel in protective order proceedings. Temple Political & Civil Rights Law Review, 15, 557–602.
7.
BertelliA. (1998). Should social workers engage in the unauthorized practice of law?Boston University Public Interest Law Journal, 8, 15–57.
8.
BrownM. F. (2001). Domestic violence advocates exposure to liability for engaging in the unauthorized practice of law. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 34, 279–299.
9.
BrowneA., SalomonA., & BassukS. S. (1999). The impact of recent partner violence on poor women's capacity to maintain work. Violence Against Women, 5, 393–426.
10.
BrushL. (2003). Effects of work on hitting and hurting. Violence Against Women, 9, 1213–1230.
FarmerA., & TiefenthalerJ (2003). Explaining the recent decline in domestic violence. Contemporary Economic Policy, 21, 158–172.
14.
FernandezM., IwamotoK., & MuscatB. (1997). Dependency and severity of abuse: Impact on women's persistence in utilizing the court system as protection against domestic violence. Women & Criminal Justice, 9, 39–63.
KleinC. F., & OrloffL. E. (1993). Providing legal protection for battered women: An analysis of state statutes and case law. Hofstra Law Review, 21, 801–1189.
19.
LambertL. C., & FirestoneJ. M. (2000). Economic context and multiple abuse techniques. Violence Against Women, 6, 49–67.
20.
LanctotC. J. (2002). Scriveners in cyberspace: Online document preparation and the unauthorized practice of law. Hofstra Law Review, 30, 811–854.
21.
LeoneJ., JohnsonM., CohanC., & LloydS. (2004). Consequences of male partner violence on low-income minority women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 472–490.
22.
LindhorstT., OxfordM., & GillmoreM. R. (2007). Longitudinal effects of domestic violence on employment and welfare outcomes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 812–828.
23.
LockM. J. (2001). Increasing access to justice: Expanding the role of nonlawyers in the delivery of services to low-income Coloradans. University of Colorado Law Review, 72, 459–506.
24.
LoganT. K., ShannonL., ColeJ., & SwanbergJ. (2007). Partner stalking and implications for women's employment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 268–291.
25.
MaddenR. G. (2000). Legal content in social work education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 20, 3–17.
26.
McCormick's Handbook of the Law of Evidence § 339, at 792 (1972).
27.
MurphyJ. C. (2001). Engaging with the state: The growing reliance on lawyers and judges to protect battered women. Journal of Gender, Social Policy, & the Law, 11, 499–521.
PavaoJ., AlvarezJ., BaumrindN., InduniM., & KimerlingR. (2007). Intimate partner violence and housing instability. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32,(1) 143-146.
30.
Pennington-ZoellnerK. (2009). Expanding “community” in the community response to intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 24, 539–545.
31.
PtacekJ. (1997). The tactics and strategies of men who batter. In CardarelliA. P. (Ed.), Violence between intimate partners: Patterns, causes, and effects (pp. 48–69). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
32.
RenzettiC. M. (2001). “One strike and you're out”: Implications of a federal crime control policy for battered women. Violence Against Women, 7, 685–698.
33.
RigerS., AhrensC., & BlickenstaffA. (2000). Measuring interference with employment and education reported by women with abusive partners: Preliminary data. Violence and Victims, 15, 161–172.
34.
RigerS., RajaS., & CamanchoJ. (2002). The radiating impact of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 184–205.
35.
RuckelshausC. K. (1996). Unemployment compensation for victims of domestic violence: An important link to economic and employment security. Clearinghouse Review, 30, 209–221.
36.
SandersC. K. (2007). Domestic violence, economic abuse and implications of a program for building economic resources for low-income women: Findings from interviews with participants in a women's economic action program (CSD Research Report 07-12). St. Louis, MO: Washington University, Center for Social Development. Retrieved from http://csd.wustl.edu/Publications/Documents/RP07-12.pdf.
37.
SchmitzS. J. (2004). What's the harm? Rethinking the role of domestic violence advocates and the unauthorized practice of law. William & Mary Journal of Women & Law, 10, 295–317.
38.
SullivanC. M. (1991). The provision of advocacy services to women leaving abusive partners: An exploratory study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6, 41–54.
39.
SwanbergJ. E., & LoganT. K. (2005). Domestic violence and employment: A qualitative study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 3–17.
40.
TolmanR. M., & RosenD. (2001). Domestic violence in the lives of women receiving welfare: Mental health, substance dependence, and economic well-being. Violence Against Women, 7(2), 141–158.
41.
TolmanR. M., & WangH. (2005). Domestic violence and women's employment: Fixed effects models of three waves of women's employment study data. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36,147-158.
42.
VanWormerN. I. (2007). Help at your fingertips: A twenty-first century response to the pro se phenomenon. Vanderbilt Law Review, 60, 983–1019.
