Most people in the United States living with companion animals consider them family members (GfK Roper, 2009), however little is known about what this means. This study explores the beliefs about and experiences with companion animals of 12 men from various ethnic and social class groups, national origins, and geographic settings. Findings include that most men considered their pets to be members of the family, though not necessarily on a par with human members. Men's attitudes and relationships appeared to vary by race/ethnicity, social class, type of geographic community, and national origin. Implications are offered for social work practice and research so that social workers might develop more accurate assessments and effective interventions by taking these relationships into account.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakerD. G., BoatB. W., GrinvalskyH. T., & GeraciotiT. D. (1998). Interpersonal trauma and animal-related experiences in female and male military veterans: Implications for program development. Military Medicine, 163, 20–25.
2.
BeckA., & KathcherA (1996). Between pets and people: The importance of animal companionship. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
3.
CastelliP., HartL. A., & ZasloffR. L. (2001). Companion cats and the social support systems of men with AIDS. Psychological Reports, 89, 177–187.
4.
ChandlerC. K. (2005). Animal assisted therapy in counseling. New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
6.
FriedmannE., & ThomasS. A. (1995). Pet ownership, social support, and oneyear survival after acute myocardial infarction in the cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial (cast). American Journal of Cardiology, 76, 1213–1217.
7.
GarrityT. F., StallonesL., MarxM. B., & JohnsonT. P. (1989). Pet ownership and attachment as supportive factors in the health of the elderly. Anthrozoos, 3(1), 35–44.
8.
GfK Roper Public Affairs & Media. (2009). The AP-Petside.com Poll. GfK Custom Research North America.
9.
HerzogH. (2007). Gender differences in human-animal interactions: A review. Anthrozoos, 21, 7–21.
10.
JerolmackC. (2007). Animal practices, ethnicity and community: The Turkish pigeon handlers of Berlin. American Sociological Review, 72, 874–895.
11.
KiddA. H., & KiddR. M. (1985). Children's attitudes toward their pets. Psychological Reports, 57, 15–31.
12.
KiddA. H., & KiddR. M. (1989). Factors in adults’ attitudes towards pets. Psychological Reports, 65(3 pt 1), 903–910.
13.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
14.
NettingF. E., WilsonC. C., & NewJ. C. (1987). The human-animal bond: Implications for practice. Social Work, 32, 60–64.
PachanaN. A., FordJ. H., AndrewB., & DobsonA. J. (2005). Relations between companion animals and self-reported health in older women: Cause, effect or artifact?International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 12, 103–110.
Pew Research Center. (2006, March 7). Gauging family intimacy: Dogs edge cats (dads trail both): A social trends report. Washington, DC: Author.
20.
Prato-PrevideE., FallaniG., & ValsecchiP. (2006). Gender differences in owners interacting with pet dogs: An observational study. Ethology, 11, 63–73.
21.
RamirezM. (2006). “My dog's just like me”: Dog ownership as a gender display. Symbolic Interaction, 29, 373–391.
22.
Risley-CurtissC. (2010). Social work practitioners and the human-other animal bond: A national study. Social Work, 55, 38–46.
23.
Risley-CurtissC., HolleyL. C., & WolfS. (2006). The animal-human bond and ethnic diversity. Social Work, 51, 257–268.
24.
Risley-CurtissC., HolleyL. C., CruickshankT., PorcelliJ., RhoadsC., BacchusD. N. A., NyakoeS., & MurphyS. B. (2006). “She was family”: Women of color and their animal-human connections. Affilia, 21, 433–447.
25.
SableP. (1995). Pets, attachment, and well-being across the life cycle. Social Work, 40, 334–341.
26.
StaatsS., & HornerK (1999). Allocating time to people and pets: Correlates with income and well-being in a Midwest community sample. The Journal of Psychology, 133, 541–552.
27.
StaatsS., SearsK., & PierfeliceL. (2006). Teacher's pets and why they have them: An investigation of the animal human bond. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 1881–1891.
28.
TowerR. (2006). Pet companionship and depression: Results from a United States Internet sample. Anthrozoos, 19, 50–64.
29.
VaughnM. G., FuQ., DeLisiM., BeaverK. M., PerronB. E., TerrellK., & HowardM. O. (2009). Correlates of cruelty to animals in the United States: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 43, 1213–1218.
30.
VitulliW. F. (2006). Attitudes toward empathy in domestic dogs and cats. Psychological Reports, 99, 981–991.
31.
WilsonC. C., & NettingF. E. (1987). New directions: Challenges for humananimal bond research and the elderly. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 6, 189–200.
