This article addresses two major impediments in delivering social services to immigrant populations. First, the lack of appropriate content related to immigration work in the curriculum of the graduate schools of social work; and secondly, the normative distance between professional providers and recipients of service. We discuss the intrinsic contradictions embodied in those impediments. While the focus of the article is on immigrants in the southwestern United States, the implications are broader. The article is a call for a re-examination of professional standards, norms, and practices in direct work with immigrants.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramsL. S., & MoioJ. A. (2009). Critical race theory and the cultural competence dilemma in social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 45(2), 245–261.
2.
BellisleM. (1999, May 27). Policy on benefits is praised for clarity. San Diego Union Tribune, p. A-3.
3.
GarcíaO. (1993). From Goya portraits to Goya beans: Elite traditions and popular streams in U.S. Spanish language policy. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 12(1/2), 69–86.
4.
HealyL. M. (2004). The international dimensions of multicultural social work. In GutiérrezL., ZúñigaM., & LumD. (Eds.), Education for multicultural social work practice: Critical viewpoints and future directions (pp. 307–318). Alexandria, VA: CSWE.
5.
HepworthD. H., RooneyR. H., RooneyG. D., Strom-GottfriedK., & LarsenJ. (2006). Direct social work practice: Theory and skills. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
6.
HodgsonL. (2004). Manufactured civil society: Counting the cost. Critical Social Policy, 24(2), 139–164.
7.
HumphriesB. (2004). The construction and reconstruction of social work. In HayesD. (Ed.), Social work, immigration and asylum. Debates, dilemmas and ethical issues[Electronic book]. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
8.
JohnsonY. M., & MunchS. (2009). Fundamental contradictions in cultural competence. Social Work (Special Issue on Racial and Ethnic Minorites), 54(3), 220–231.
9.
KisthardtW. E. (2006). The opportunities and challenges of strengths-based, person-centered practice: Purpose, principles, and applications in a climate of systems’ integration. In SaleebeyD. (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice (pp. 171-196).
10.
LeeP. R. (1930). Cause and function. In National Conference on Social Work, Proceedings: 1929 (pp. 3–20). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
MaffiL. (2002). Endangered languages, endangered knowledge. Oxford, UK and Malden, MA: UNESCO and Blackwell Publishers.
12.
Martinez-BrawleyE. E., & ZoritaP. M-B. (2001). Immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers: The challenges of services in the Southwest. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 10(3), 49–67.
13.
Martinez-BrawleyE. E., & ZoritaP. M-B. (2006). Language, identity and empowerment: The case of Spanish in the Southwest. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 15(1/2), 81–95.
14.
Martinez-BrawleyE. E., & ZoritaP. M-B (2009a). Immigration issues in the Mexican border states: Syllabi in MSW programs. E-survey to the graduate schools of social work in the border states. Constant Contact e-survey systems. Unpublished document.
15.
Martinez-BrawleyE. E., & ZoritaP. M-B. (2009b). Immigration and social work: What do practitioners need to know. Paper presented at the 51st Annual Conference of the Western Social Science Association, Albuquerque, NM, April 16, 2009.
16.
National Association of Social Workers. (2006). Cultural and linguistic competence in the social work profession. In Social Work Speaks: NASW (Policy statements 2006-2009, 7th ed. pp.77-83). Washington, DC: Author.
17.
National Association of Social Workers. (2007). Indicators for the achievement of the NASW Standards for Cultural Competence in Social Work Practice. Washington, DC: Author.
18.
NewsomeM. (2004). Analysis of past and present movements in cultural competence theory and practice knowledge in social work education. In GutiérrezL., ZúñigaM., & LumD. (Eds.), Education for multicultural social work practice: Critical viewpoints and future directions (pp. 3–18). Alexandria, VA: CSWE.
OrganistaK. C. (2007). Mexican migration for dummies: What social workers and the public need to know. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 16(3/4), 189–198.
21.
PadillaY. (1997). Immigrant policy: Issues for social work. Social Work, 42(9), 595–606.
22.
PasselJ., & CohnD (2009). Mexican immigrants: How many come? How many leave? Pew Hispanic Center. Retrieved August 2009, from http://www.PewHispanicCenter.org
23.
PayneM. (1991). Modern social work theory: A critical introduction. Chicago: Lyceum.
24.
PetrovichA., & LoweM (2005). Developing cultural competence: Student and alumni perspectives. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 25(3/4), 157–176.
25.
RazackN., & JefferyD (2002). Critical race discourse and tenets of social work. Canadian Social Work Review, 19(2), 257–271.
26.
ReadeE. (1987). British town and country planning. Milton Keyes: Open University Press.
27.
RosalesA. F. (1997). Chicano! A history of the Mexican American civil rights movement. Houston, TX: Arte Público Press.
28.
StrugD. L., & MasonS. E. (2002). Social service needs of Hispanic immigrants: An exploratory study of the Washington Heights community. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 10(3), 69–88.
29.
WeilM. (1983). Southeast Asians and service delivery: Issues in service provision and institutional racism. In Bridging cultures: Social work with Southeast Asian refugees (pp. 136–163). Los Angeles: Asian American Community Mental Health Training Center.
30.
WilbanksD. W. (1996). Re-creating America. Nashville: Abingdon Press.
31.
ZúñigaM. (2004). Latino needs: Flexible and empowering interventions. In GutiérrezL., ZúñigaM., & LumD. (Eds.), Education for multicultural social work practice: Critical viewpoints and future directions (pp. 185–199). Alexandria, VA: CSWE.
