This article describes two focus groups that explored Latino church leaders' attitudes and knowledge about domestic violence. Participants were well aware of the intergenerational nature of domestic violence and suggested both religious and secular interventions. They were opposed to separation or divorce and did not view abusers as being responsible for their violent behavior. Some participants disclosed significant personal experience with domestic violence. Results suggest that efforts to engage Latino church leaders in domestic violence prevention/intervention should acknowledge the religious and cultural importance of keeping families together, build on the positive aspects of traditional male/female roles in Latino cultures, and incorporate opportunities for sharing and healing from personal experiences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AcevedoM. J. (2000). Battered immigrant Mexican women's perspectives regarding abuse and help-seeking. Journal of Multicultural Social Work, 8(3/4), 243-282.
2.
AdamesS. B., & CampbellR. (2005). Immigrant Latinas’ conceptualizations of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 11, 1341–1364.
3.
Aguilar-HassG., DuttonM. A., & OrloffL. E. (2000). Lifetime prevalence of violence against Latina immigrants: Legal and policy implications. International Review of Victimology, 7, 93–113.
4.
AlthoffA. (2007, October 10). Migration and the transformation of Latino religious identities in the United States. Lecture presented at Metro Chicago Immigration Workshop, University of Chicago. Retrieved February 3, 2009, from http://cas.uchicago.edu/workshops/immigration/events/paper_AndreaAlthoff.doc
5.
Bent-GoodleyT. B., & FowlerD. N. (2006). Spiritual and religious abuse: Expanding what is known about domestic violence. Journal of Women and Social Work, 2, 282–295.
6.
BrabeckK. M., & GuzmanM. R. (2008). Frequency and perceived effectiveness of strategies to survive abuse employed by battered Mexican-origin women. Violence Against Women, 14(11), 1274–1294.
Cooper-WhiteP. (1996). An emperor without clothes: The church's views about treatment of domestic violence. Pastoral Psychology, 43, 3–20.
9.
DixonC. K. (1995). Violence in families: The development of a program to enable clergy to provide support. Journal of Family Studies, 1(1), 14–23.
10.
DixonC. K. (1995). Violence in families: The development of a program to enable clergy to provide support. Journal of Family Studies, 1(1), 14–23.
11.
EdelsonM. G., HokodaA., & Ramos-LiraL. (2007). Differences in effects of domestic violence between Latina and non-Latina women. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 1–10.
12.
EllisonC. G., TrinitapoliJ. A., AndersonK. L., & JohnsonB. R. (2007). Race/ethnicity, religious involvement, and domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 13, 1094–1112.
13.
EspinosaG., ElizondoV., & MirandaJ. (Eds.). (2005). Latino religious and civic activism in the United States.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
14.
FongR., & FurutoS. B. C. L. (Eds.). (2001). Culturally competent practice: Skills, interventions, and evaluations.Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
15.
FrederickK. E. (2004). Clinging to the threshold of hope. Journal of Religion and Abuse, 6(1), 5–13.
16.
HancockT. U., & AmesN. (2008). Toward a model for engaging Latino lay ministers in domestic violence intervention. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 89(4), 623–630.
17.
HancockT. U., & SiuK. (2008). A culturally sensitive intervention with domestically violent Latino immigrant men. Journal of Family Violence, 24, 123–132.
18.
HarrisR., FirestoneJ., & VegaW. (2005). The interaction of country of origin, acculturation, and gender role ideology on wife abuse. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 463–483.
19.
HazenA. L., & SorianoF. I. (2007). Experiences with intimate partner violence among Latina women. Violence Against Women, 13, 562–582
20.
JonesA. S., FowlerT. S., FarmerD. F., AndersonR. T., & RichmondD. W. (2005). Description and evaluation of a faith community-based domestic violence pilot program in Forsyth County, NC. Journal of Religion and Abuse, 7(4), 55–87.
21.
KasturiranganA., & WilliamsE. N. (2003). Counseling Latina battered women: A qualitative study of the Latina perspective. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 31, 162–178.
22.
ManettaA. A., BryantD. F., CavanaughT., & GangeT. A. (2003). The church— Does it provide support for abused women: Differences in the perceptions of battered women and parishioners. Journal of Religion & Abuse, 5(1), 5–21.
23.
MurdaughC., HuntS., SowellR., & SantanaI. (2004). Domestic violence in Hispanics in the southeastern United States: A survey and needs analysis. Journal of Family Violence, 19, 107–114.
Nason-ClarkN. (2004). When terror strikes at home: The interface between religion and domestic violence. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 43, 303–310.
26.
Nason-ClarkN., MurphyN., Fisher-TownsendB., & RuffL. (2003). An overview of the characteristics of the clients at a faith-based batterers’ intervention program. Journal of Religion & Abuse, 5(4), 51–72.
27.
North Carolina Women's Health Report Card. (2005). Chapel Hill, NC: Center for Women's Health Research at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Retrieved January 21, 2008, from http://cwhr.unc.edu/n-c-womens-healthreport-card/report-cards
Shannon-LewyC., & DullV. T. (2005). The response of Christian clergy to domestic violence: Help or hindrance?Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 647–659.
36.
StricklandG. A., WelshimerK. J., & ServelaP. D. (1998). Clergy perspectives and practices regarding intimate partner violence: A rural view. The Journal of Rural Health, 14, 305–311.
Vidal de HaymesM., & KiltyK. (2007). Latino population growth, characteristics, and settlement trends: Implications for social work education in a dynamic political climate. Journal of Social Work Education, 43(1), 101–116.
39.
WareK. N., LevittH. M., & BayerG. (2003). May God help you: Faith leaders’ perspectives of intimate partner violence within their communities. Journal of Religion and Abuse, 5(2), 55–81.
