In the study, we examined differences in marital adjustment and in personal and spousal variables related to marital adjustment among women who cohabited with their spouses before marriage versus those who did not. The noncohabiting women reported better levels of adjustment of spousal cohesion and display of affection, and they used strategies of concession to resolve marital conflicts to a greater extent than did women who cohabited. Among both groups of women, conflict resolution strategies correlated positively with marital adjustment, whereas the strategy of dominance and the attachment style of anxiety correlated negatively. In light of the research findings, practical recommendations are provided for preventive interventions among couples who cohabited before marriage and those who did not.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AxinnW. G., & ThorntonA. (1992). The relationship between cohabitation and divorce: Selectivity or causality?Demography, 29, 357–374.
2.
Belloush-KleinmanV. (1994). Tofa'at hacohabitazia beyisrael—meafyenim vedefus ma'arekhet hayahasim: Ha'im hi tahlif lemodas hanisuim?[Cohabitation in Israel—characteristics and relationship patterns: Will cohabitation become a substitute for the institution of marriage?] Unpublished master's thesis, School of Social Work, Haifa University, Haifa, Israel.
3.
Belloush-KleinmanV., & SharlinS. (1999). Cohabitazia bekerev bogrim tzei'irim beyisrael [Cohabitation among young adults in Israel]. Hevra Verevaha [Society and Welfare], 19, 461-484.
4.
Ben-MeirY., & KedemP. (1979). Madad datiut avur ha'ukhlusia hayehudit beyisrael [Index of religiosity of the Jewish population of Israel].Megamot, 24, 362–535.
5.
BoothA., & JohnsonD (1988). Premarital cohabitation and marital success.Journal of Family Issues, 9, 255–272.
6.
BowlbyJ. (1977). The making and breaking of affection bonds. Etiology and psychopathology in light of attachment theory.British Journal of Psychiatry, 130, 201–210.
7.
BradburyT. N. (1998). The developmental course of marital dysfunction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BrennanK. A., ClarkC. L., & ShaverP. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In SimpsonJ. A. & RholesW. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York: Guilford Press.
9.
BrownS. L., & BoothA. (1996). Cohabitation versus marriage: A comparison of relationship quality.Journal of Marriage and Family, 53, 913–927.
10.
BryndlE. H. M. (2006). Shared beliefs and the union stability of married and cohabiting couples.Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1015–1028.
11.
BumpassL. L. (1990). What's happening to the family? Interactions between demographic and institutional change.Demography, 27, 483–498.
12.
ButlerM. H., StoutJ. A., & GardnerB. C. (2002). Prayer as a conflict resolution ritual: Clinical implications of religious couples’ report of relationship softening, healing perspective, and change responsibility.American Journal of Family Therapy, 30, 19–37.
13.
CallV. R. A., & HeatonT. B. (1997). Religious influence on marital stability.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36, 382–392.
14.
CohanC. L., & KleinbaumS. (2002). Toward a greater understanding of the cohabitation effect: Premarital cohabitation and marital communication.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64, 180–192.
15.
CollinsN. L., & FeeneyB. C. (2000). A safe haven: An attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1053–1073.
16.
CollinsN. L. & ReadS. J. (1990). Adult attachments, working models and relationship quality in dating couples.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 644–663.
17.
CrowellJ. A., TrebouxD., & WatersE. (2002). Stability of attachment representations: The transition to marriage.Developmental Psychology, 38, 467–479.
18.
CurtisK. T., & EllisonC. G. (2002). Religious heterogamy and marital conflict: Findings from a national survey of families and households.Journal of Family Issues, 23, 551–576.
19.
Fogiel-BijaouiS. (1999). Mishpachot beYisrael: Bein mishpachtiyut lepost moderniut [Families in Israel: Between familism and post modernism]. In IzraeliD. N., FriedmanA., Dahan-KalevH., Fogiel-BijaouiS., HerzogH., HasanN.. (Eds.), Sex, gender, politics: Women in Israel (pp. 107–166). Tel Aviv, Israel: Hakibbutz Hameuchad.
20.
ForsteR., & TanferK (1996). Sexual exclusivity among dating, cohabiting, and married women.Journal of Marriage and Family, 58, 33–47.
21.
GalloL. G., & SmithT. W. (2001). Attachment style in marriage: Adjustment and responses to interaction.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 263–289.
22.
GottmanJ. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
HahlwegK., & MarkmanH. J. (1988). Effectiveness of behavioral marital therapy: Empirical status of behavioral techniques in preventing and alleviating marital distress.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 440–447.
24.
HalmanL. (1999). The religious factor in contemporary society.International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 40, 141–160.
25.
HazanC., & ShaverP. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.
26.
HazanC., & ShaverP. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships.Psychological Inquiry, 5, 1–22.
27.
HeaveyC. H., LayneC., & ChristensenA. (1993). Gender and conflicts structure in marital interaction: A replication and extension.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 16–27.
28.
Israel Central Bureau of Statistics. (2007, February). Family day: Families and households in Israel - selected data for 2005. Press release published on 13 February 2007.
29.
Israel Central Bureau of Statistics. (2009, February). Family day: Selected data on families and households in Israel. Press release published on 23 February 2009.
30.
JohnsonC. A., StanleyS. M., GlennN. D., AmatoP. A., NockS. L., & MarkmanH. J. (2002). Marriage in Oklahoma: 2001 baseline statewide survey on marriage and divorce. Oklahoma City: Oklahoma Department of Human Services.
31.
KlineG. H., StanleyS. M., MarkmanH. J., Olmos-GalloP., St. PetersM., WhittonS. W., . (2004). Timing is everything: Pre-engagement cohabitation and increased risk for poor marital outcomes.Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 311–318.
32.
KlohnenE. C., & BeraS. (1998). Behavioral and experiential patterns of avoidantly and securely attached women across adulthood: A 31-year longitudinal perspective.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 211–223.
33.
KulikL., & ErantalT (2009). Contemporary family relationships and life values: A comparative analysis of men and women in Israel.Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 90, 231–238.
34.
KurdekL. A. (1993). Predicting marital dissolution: A 5-year prospective longitudinal study of newlywed couples.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 221–242.
35.
LaveeY., & KatzR (2003). The family in Israel: Between tradition and modernity.Marriage and Family Review, 35, 193–217.
36.
LehrerE. L. (2004). The role of religion in union formation: An economic perspective.Population Research and Policy Review, 23, 161–185.
37.
MacDermidS. M., HustonT. L., & MacHaleS. M. (1990). Changes in marriage associated with the transition to parenthood: Individual differences as a function of sex-role attitudes and changes in the division of household labor.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 475–486.
38.
MahoneyA., PargamentK. I., JewellT., SwankA. B., ScottE., EmeryE., . (1999). Marriage and the spiritual realm: The role of proximal and distal religious constructs in marital functioning.Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 321–338.
39.
MikulincerM., & FlorianV (1999). The association between spouses’ self-reports of attachment styles and representations of family dynamics.Family Process, 38, 69–83.
40.
MikulincerM., & FlorianV (2001). Attachment style and affect regulation. Implications for coping with stress and mental health. In FletcherG. & ClarkM. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 537–557). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
41.
MorrisM. L., & CarterS. A. (1999). Transition to marriage: A literature review.Journal of Family and Consumer Science Education, 17, 1–21.
42.
PinesA. M. (1986). Shehika nafshit: Mahuta vedarkei hitmodedut ima[Burnout: Characteristics and patterns of coping] (2nd ed.). Tel Aviv, Israel: Cherikover.
43.
Pilegesh bagiva [Concubine on the hill]. (2006, April 11). Yediot Aharonot, p. 6.
44.
RahimM. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict.Academy of Management Journal, 26, 368–376.
45.
RahimM. A., & BonomaT. V. (1979). Managing organizational conflicts: A module for diagnostics and intervention.Psychological Reports, 44, 1323–1344.
46.
RoggeR. D. (2002). An examination of the predictors of discord and divorce in the early stages of marriage. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of California at Los Angeles.
47.
SharirS. L. (1996). The relationship between attachment style and conflict resolution style among married couples. Ramat Gan, Israel: Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University.
48.
ShiL. (1999). Conflict resolution in romantic relationships: An examination of adult attachment and early attachment experience. Texas Tech University.Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, (4-B), 1903.
49.
SimpsonJ. A. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 971–980.
50.
SmockP. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications.Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1–20.
51.
SpanierG. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28.
52.
ThomsonE., & ColellaU (1992). Cohabitation and marital stability: Quality or commitment?Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 259–267.
53.
WilschinskyN. (2001). Datiut vebriut nafshit: Misveuit bahaim, pahad mavet vetemiha hevratit nitpeset kemetavhim efshariim shel hakesher ben hitnahagut datit ve'emuna datit leven revaha nafshit vemetzuka nafshit[Religiosity and mental health: Life satisfaction, fear of death and perceived social support as potential mediators in the relationship between religious behavior and religious faith on the one hand, and well-being and emotional distress on the other]. Unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Psychologyl: Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
54.
VollingB. L., NotaroP. C., & LarsenJ. J. (1998). Adult attachment styles: Relations with emotional well-being, marriage, and parenting.Family Relations: Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 47, 355–367.
55.
WilcoxW. B., & WolfingerN. H. (2007). Then comes marriage? Religion, race, and marriage in urban America.Social Science Research, 36, 569–589.
