Working at one point of time does not always mean sustained employment among low-income mothers. The purpose of this study is to investigate what contributes to the different patterns of longitudinal employment by tracking a sample of 131 rural, low-income mothers with intermittent employment over 3 waves. The intermittent employment trajectories are categorized as job change, job loss, and job gain. A mixed-methods approach was chosen to maximize the complementary nature of quantitative and qualitative data. The findings of both multinomial logistic regression and inductive analysis show that individual, family, and structural characteristics play important roles for sustained employment. Case studies vividly illustrate similarities and differences across the 3 patterns of intermittent employment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonP. M., & LevineP. B. (2000). Child care and mothers’ employment decisions. In CardD. & BlankR. M. (Eds.), Finding jobs: Work and welfare reform (pp. 420–462). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
BeimersD., & FischerR. L. (2007). Pathways to employment: The experiences of TANF recipients with employment services.Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 88(3), 391–400.
4.
BerryA. A. (2003). The relationship between selected housing and demographic characteristics and employment status among rural, low-income families (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.
5.
BerryA. A., KatrasM. J., SanoY., LeeJ., & BauerJ. (2008). Job volatility of rural, low-income mothers: A mixed methods approach.Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29, 5–22.
6.
BlankR. (1989). The effect of medical need and Medicare on AFDC participation.Journal of Human Resources, 24, 54–87.
7.
ButlerM. A., & BealeC. L. (1994). Rural-urban continuum codes of metro and nonmetro counties, 1993. [Staff Report No. 9425]. Agriculture and Rural Economy Division, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.
8.
CancianM., & MeyerD. R. (2000). Work after welfare: Women's work effort, occupation, and economic well-being.Social Work Research, 24, 69–86.
9.
Corporate Voices for Working Families & WFD Consulting. (2006). Workplace flexibility for lower wage workers. Washington, DC: Corporate Voices.
10.
CraypoR. K. (1991). Industrial restructuring and the working poor in a Midwestern U.S. factory town.Labour and Society, 16, 153–174.
11.
CreswellJ. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
12.
CreswellJ. W., & PlanoV. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
DanzigerS. K., CorcoranM., DanzigerS., HeflinC., KalilA., LevineJ., . (2000). Barriers to the employment of welfare recipients. In CherryR. & RodgersW. (Eds.), Prosperity for all? The economic boom and African Americans (pp. 245–278). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
14.
DolanE., BraunB., KatrasM. J., & SeilingS. (2008). Getting off TANF: Experiences of rural mothers.Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 89(3), 456–465.
15.
DuncanC. (1999). Worlds apart: Why poverty persists in rural America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16.
DworskyA., & CourtneyM (2007). Barriers to employment among TANF applicants and their consequences for self-sufficiency.Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 88(3), 379–389.
17.
EdinK., & LeinL (1997). Making ends meet: How single mothers survive welfare and low-wage work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
18.
FindeisJ. L., HenryM., HirschlT. A., LewisW., Ortega-SanchezI., PeineE., . (2001). Welfare reform in rural America: A review of current research. Rural Policy Research Institute. Retrieved from http://www.rupri.org/publications/archive/reports/P2001-5.
19.
FletcherC. N., GaraskyS. B., & NielsenR. B. (2005). Transportation hardship: Are you better off with a car?Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 26, 323–343.
GibbsR. (2001) Nonmetro labor markets in the era of welfare reform. Rural America, 16(3), 11–14.
22.
HorwitzS., & KerkerB. D. (2001). Impediments to employment under welfare reform: The importance of physical health and psychological characteristics.Women and Health, 32, 101–117.
23.
HynesK., & ClarkbergM (2005). Women's employment patterns during early parenthood: A group-based trajectory analysis.Journal of Marriage and Family, 27, 222–239.
24.
JenkinsS. (1992). Lone mothers’ employment and full-time work probabilities.Economic Journal, 102, 310–320.
25.
KatrasM. J. B. (2003). The private safety net: How rural, low-income families access and use resources to make ends meet in the era of welfare reform (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN.
26.
KimR. Y. (2000). Factors associated with employment status of parents receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families.Social Work Research, 24, 211–221.
27.
KlermanG. L., & WeissmanM. H. (1992). The course, morbidity, and costs of depression.Archives of General Psychiatry, 49, 831–834.
28.
LambertE. G., HoganN. L., & BartonS. M. (2001). The impact of job satisfaction on turnover intent: A test of a structural measurement model using a national sample of workers.Social Science Journal, 38, 233–250.
29.
LichterD. T., & JayakodyR. (2002). Welfare reform: How do we measure success?Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 117–141.
30.
LichterD. T., & JensenL. (2001). Rural poverty and welfare among rural femaleheaded families: Before and after PRWOR A.Rural America, 16(3), 28–35.
31.
LingleK. (2008, September). Work-life effectiveness. Presentation at the Epsilon Sigma Phi pre-conference, Leading Change for a Healthy Organization, Galaxy III Conference, Indianapolis, IN.
32.
LondonR. A. (2006). The role of postsecondary education in welfare recipients’ paths to self-sufficiency.Journal of Higher Education, 77, 472–496.
33.
MeyerD. R., & CancianM. (1998). Economic well-being following an exit from Aid to Families with Dependent Children.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 479–494.
34.
MeyersM. (1993). Child care in JOBS employment and training programs: What difference does quality make?Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 767–783.
35.
MishelL., BernsteinJ., & SchmittJ. (1997). The state of working America, 1996-1997. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
36.
MonroeP. A., BlalockL. B., & VloskyR. P. (1999). Work opportunities in a nontraditional setting for women exiting welfare: A case study.Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 20, 35–60.
37.
OntaiL., SanoY., PongH. N., & CongerK. (2008). Low-income rural mothers’ perceptions of parent confidence: Role of family health problems and partner status.Family Relations, 57, 324–334.
38.
PressJ., Johnson-DiasJ., & FaganJ. (2005). Welfare status and child care as obstacles to full-time work for low-income mothers. Journal of Women, Politics and Policy, 27(3/4), 55–79.
39.
RadloffL. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population.Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.
40.
SeilingS., DevittoZ., VarcoeK., & KimE.-J. (2005). Ethnic differences in predictors of health care use among low-income, rural women.Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Council on Consumer Interests, 51, 216–220.
41.
SimmonsL. A., BraunB., WrightD. W., & MillerS. R. (2007). Human capital, social support, and economic well-being among rural, low-income mothers: A latent growth curve analysis.Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 635–652.
42.
StakeR. E. (2000). Case studies. In DenzinN. K. & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.; pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
43.
StrawnJ., & MartisonK (2001). Promoting access to better jobs: Lessons for job advancement from welfare reform. In KazisR. & MillerM. (Eds.), Low-wage workers in the new economy (pp. 111–133). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
44.
SturmR., & WellsK (2001). Does obesity contribute as much to morbidity as poverty or smoking?Public Health, 115, 229–236.
45.
TashakkoriA., & TeddlieC (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
46.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2005). Indicators of welfare dependence: Annual report to Congress. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/indicators05/ch2.htm#tb28b.
47.
UrbanJ. A., & OlsonP. N. (2005). A comprehensive employment model for lowincome mothers.Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 26, 101–122.
48.
WhitenerL. A., WeberB. A., & DuncanG. J. (2001). Reforming welfare: Implications for rural America.Rural America, 16(3), 2–10.
49.
WilsonW. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York: Vintage Books.
50.
YinR. K. (2003). Applications of case study research (2nd ed.). Applied social research methods series (Vol. 34). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
