This article presents a qualitative study exploring respondents’ perceptions of live supervision as the primary field instruction method for MSW students participating in an internship that emphasized family therapy. Participants were specifically asked in what ways live supervision supported and facilitated learning clinical practice. Identifying live supervision as important for bridging the pedagogical gap between teaching theory and practice learning stood out as an important metatheme of the study, not previously discussed in the literature. Important emergent categories included learning-in-action pedagogy, feedback loop for integrative learning, the safety net in parallel observation, transparency in the supervision process, and building capacity for entering the workforce. Incorporating the principles of adult learning theory, live supervision offers an important contribution to social work field education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BardillD. R., & SaundersB. E. (1988). Marriage and family therapy and graduate social work education. In LiddleH. A., BreunlinD. C., & SchwartzR. C. (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy training and supervision. New York: Guilford.
2.
BergerM., & DammannC (1982). Live supervision as context, treatment and training.Family Process, 21, 337–344.
3.
BernardJ. M., & GoodyearR. K. (2004). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson/AB.
4.
BernotaviczF. (1994). A new paradigm for competency-based training.Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 6, 3–9.
5.
BogoM. (2005). Field instruction in social work: A review of the research literature.The Clinical Supervisor, 24, 163–193.
6.
BrandtB. L., FarmerJ. A.Jr. & BuckmasterA. (1993). Cognitive apprenticeship approach to helping adults learn. In FlanneryD. D. (Ed.), Applying cognitive learning theory to adult learning (pp. 68–79). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
BrookfieldS. D. (1986). Understanding and facilitating adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
BryantC. (1980). Introducing students to the treatment of inner-city families.Social Casework: The Journal of Contemporary Social Work, 61, 629–636.
9.
BubenzerD. L., WestJ. D., & GoldJ. (1991). Use of live supervision in counselor preparation.Counselor Education & Supervision, 30, 301–308.
10.
CarlozziA. F., RomansJ. S., BoswellD. L., FergusonD. B., & WhisenhuntB. J. (1997). Training and supervision practices in counseling and marriage and family therapy programs.The Clinical Supervisor, 15, 51–60.
11.
CharlesL. L., Ticheli-KallikasM., TynerK., & Barber-StephensB. (2005). Crisis management during “live” supervision: Clinical and instructional matters.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31(3), 207–219.
12.
ChampeJ., & KleistD. M. (2003). Live supervision: A review of the research.The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 11(3), 269–275.
13.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
14.
CharnyI. W. (1986). What do therapists worry about: A tool for experiential supervision. In KaslowF. (Ed.), Supervision and training: Models, dilemmas and challenges (pp. 17–28). New York: The Haworth Press.
15.
ChurchillS. D., LoweryO. M., & RaoA. (1998). The question of reliability in interpretive psychological research. In ValleR. (Ed.), Phenomenological inquiry in psychology (pp. 63–84). New York: Plenum Press.
16.
CollK. (1995). Clinical supervision of community counselors: Current and preferred practices.Counselor Education and Supervision, 38, 111–117.
17.
ConstableR., & LeeD. B. (2004). Social work with families: Content and process. Chicago: Lyceum.
18.
Council on Social Work Education. (2008). Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards. Alexandria, VA: Author.
19.
EvansD. (1987). Live supervision in the same room: A practice teaching method.Social Work Education, 6(3), 13–17.
20.
FalenderC. A., & ShafranskeE. P. (2004). Clinical supervision: A competency-based approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21.
FennelD. L., HovestadtA. J., & HarveyS. J. (1986). A comparison of delayed feedback and live supervision models of marriage and family therapist clinical training.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 12(2), 181–186.
22.
FortuneA. E., LeeM., & CavazosA. (2007). Does practice make perfect? Practicing professional skills and outcomes in social work field education. The Clinical Supervisor, 26(1/2), 239–263.
23.
FortuneA. E., McCarthyM., & AbramsonJ. S. (2001). Student learning processes in field education: Relationship of learning activities to quality of field instruction, satisfaction, and performance among MSW students.Journal of Social Work Education, 37(1), 111–124.
24.
GershensonJ., & CohenM. S. (1978). Through the looking glass: The experience of two family therapy trainees with live supervision.Family Process, 7, 225–230.
25.
GlobermanJ., & BogoM (2002). The impact of hospital restructuring on social work field education.Health & Social Work, 27(1), 7–16.
26.
HendricksonS. M., VeachP. M., & LeRoyB. S. (2002). A qualitative investigation of student and supervisor perceptions of live supervision in genetic counseling.Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11(1), 25–49.
JordanK. (1999). Live supervision for beginning therapists in practicum: Crucial for quality counseling and avoiding litigation.Family Therapy, 26, 81–86.
29.
KadushinA., & HarknessD (2002). Supervision in social work (4th ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
30.
KaplanR. (1987). The current uses of live supervision within marriage and family therapy training programs.The Clinical Supervisor, 5(3), 43–52.
31.
KaslowN. J., & BellK. D. (2008). A competency-based approach to supervision. In FalenderC. A. & ShafranskeE. P. (Eds.), Casebook for clinical supervision: A competency-based approach (pp. 17–38). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
32.
KnightC. (2001). The process of field instruction: BSW and MSW students’ views of effective field supervision.Journal of Social Work Education, 37(2), 357–379.
33.
KruegerR. A., & CaseyM. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
34.
LiddleH. A. (1991). Training and supervision in family therapy: A comprehensive and critical analysis. In A. S. Gurman & D. P. Kniskern, Handbook of Family Therapy: Vol. II (pp. 638–697). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
35.
MaidmentJ. (2000). Methods used to teach social work students in the field: A research report from New Zealand.Social Work Education, 19(3), 145–154.
36.
MatarazzoR. G., & PattersonD. R. (1986). Methods of teaching therapeutic skills. In GarfieldS. L. & BerginA. D. (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (3rd ed.; pp. 821–843). New York: John Wiley.
37.
McKenzieP. N., AtkinsonB. J., QuinnW. H., & HeathA. W. (1986). Training and supervision in marriage and family therapy: A national survey.The American Journal of Family Therapy, 14(4), 293–303.
38.
MerriamS. B., & CaffarellaR. S. (1999). Experience and learning. Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (2nd ed.; pp. 221–247). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39.
MontalvoB. (1973). Aspects of live supervision.Family Process, 12, 343–359.
40.
MunsonC. E. (2002). Use of theory. In Handbook of clinical social work supervision (pp. 209–238). New York: Haworth Press.
41.
MunsonC. E. (1980). Supervising the family therapist.Social Casework: The Journal of Contemporary Social Work, 61, 131–137.
42.
PadgettD. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
43.
SharplessB. A., & BarberJ. P. (2009). A conceptual and empirical review of the meaning, measurement, development, and teaching of intervention competence in clinical psychology.Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 47–56.
44.
SimonR. (1982). Behind the one-way mirror: An interview with Jay Haley, Part I. The Family Networker, 6(5), 19-29, 58-59.
45.
StolenbergC. D. (2008). Developmental approaches to supervision. In FalenderC. A. & ShafranskeE. P. (Eds.), Casebook for clinical supervision: A competency-based approach (pp. 39–56). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
46.
StormC., ToddT., SprenkleD. H., & MorganM. (2001). Gaps between MFT supervision assumptions and common practice: Suggested best practices.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27, 227–239.
47.
ThomlisonB. (1995). Student perceptions of reflective team supervision. In RogersG. (Ed.), Social work field education: Views and visions (pp. 234–244). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
48.
ThomlisonB., & CorcoranK (2008). The evidence-based internship: A field manual. New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
TuckerB. Z., & LiddleH. A. (1978). Intra-and interpersonal process in the group supervision of family therapists.Family Therapy, 5(1), 13–27.
50.
WarkL. (1995). Defining the territory of live supervision in family therapy training: A qualitative study and theoretical discussion.The Clinical Supervisor, 13, 145–162.
51.
WongY. L. S. (1997). Live supervision in family therapy: Trainee perspectives.The Clinical Supervisor, 15(1), 145–156.
