This longitudinal study examined attitudes toward marriage and intimate male relationships among female, welfare-reliant African American heads of household (N = 20). Respondents were selected through a purposive and snowball sampling technique. Most were single and 23–49 years of age, and typical families included 4 children. Respondents educational levels ranged from 10 to 14 years, and they had been on welfare an average of 6.2 years. Ethnographic data were collected by repeated interviews for 40 months from 1997 to 2000. Subjective and attitudinal outcomes among respondents appeared to be influenced by differential socioeconomic and life circumstances. Implications are discussed regarding public welfare policies, the impact on low-income families, and the federal Healthy Marriage Initiative.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerrickJ. D. (1995). Faces of poverty: Portraits of women and children on welfare.New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
BesharovD. J., & SullivanT. S. (1996). Welfare reform and marriage. The Public Interest, 125, 81–94.
3.
BowieS. L. (2004). Navigating the concrete jungle: African American children and adolescents in urban public housing developments. In DulmusC. N. & SowersK. M. (Eds.), How institutions are shaping the future of our children (pp. 101–128). New York: Haworth.
4.
BramlettM., & MosherW. (2002, July). Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and remarriage in the United States [National Center for Health Statistics]. Vital Health Statistics, 23(22).
5.
BrockT., NelsonL. T., & ReiterM. (2002). Readying welfare recipients for work: Lessons from four big cities as they implement welfare reform. New York: MDRC.
6.
ButlerA. C. (2002). Welfare, premarital childbearing, and the role of normative climate: 1968-1994. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64, 295–313.
CresswellJ. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
DeNavas-WaltC., ProctorB. D., & LeeC. H. (2005, August). Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2005. In Current population reports (Series P60-229). Retrieved from the U.S. Census Bureau Web site: http://www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/p60-229.pdf.
10.
EdinK. (2000). Few good men: Why poor mothers don't marry or remarry. American Prospect, 11, 26–31.
11.
EdinK., & LeinL (1996). Work, welfare, and single mothers’ economic survival strategies. American Sociological Review, 61, 253–266.
12.
EdinK., & LeinL (1997). Making ends meet: How single mothers survive welfare and low-wage work.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
13.
ElmelechY., & Hsien-HenL. (2004). Race, ethnicity, and the gender poverty gap. Social Science Research, 33, 158–182.
14.
FeinD. J. (2004). Married and poor: Basic characteristics of economically disadvantaged couples in the U.S.New York: MDRC.
15.
FranklinD. L., SmithS. E., & McMillerE. P. (1995). Correlates of marital status among African American mothers in Chicago neighborhoods of concentrated poverty. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 141–152.
16.
GoodwinL. D., & GoodwinW. L. (1999). Qualitative vs. quantitative research or qualitative and quantitative research? In DownsF. S. (Ed.), Readings in research methodology (2nd ed.; pp. 54–57). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
17.
JamesA. D. (1998). What's love got to do with it? Economic viability and the likelihood of marriage among African American men.Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 29, 374–386.
18.
JonesR. K., & LuoY. (1999). The culture of poverty and African-American culture: An empirical assessment.Sociological Perspectives, 42, 439–458.
19.
KarlsJ. M. (2002). Person-in-environment system: Its essence and applications. In RobertsA. & GreeneG. J. (Eds.), Social worker's desk reference (pp. 194–198). New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
KingA. O. (1999). African American females’ attitudes toward marriage: An exploratory study.Journal of Black Studies, 29, 416–437.
21.
LichterD. T., GraefeD. R., & BrownB. J. (2003). Is marriage a panacea? Union formation among economically disadvantaged unwed mothers.Social Problems, 50, 60–86.
McLaughlinD. K., & LichterD. T. (1997). Poverty and the marital behavior of young women.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 582–594.
24.
MillerR. R., & BrowningS. L. (2000). Sharing a man: Insights from research. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 31, 339–346.
25.
PinderhughesE. B. (2002). African American marriage in the 20th century. Family Process, 41, 269–283.
26.
RectorR. E., FaganP. E., & JohnsonK. A. (2004, March 9). Marriage: Still the safest place for women [No. 1732]. Backgrounder. The Heritage Foundation.
27.
RectorR. E., & PardueM. G. (2004, March 26). Understanding the president's Healthy Marriage Initiative [No. 1741]. Backgrounder. The Heritage Foundation.
28.
RubinA., & BabbieE. A. (2008). Research methods for social work (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
29.
SeccombeK. (2000). Families in poverty in the 1990s: Trends, causes, consequences, and lessons learned.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1094–1113.
30.
U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children & Families. (2006a). African American Healthy Marriage Initiative: A targeted strategy for working effectively with African American communities [Fact sheets]. Retrieved February 16, 2008, from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/healthymarriage/about/factsheets.html.
31.
U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children & Families. (2006b). Reauthorization of the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families Program; Interim final rule. Retrieved September 2, 2007, from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofa/tanfregs/tfinrule.htm.
32.
U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Office of Family Assistance. (2007). Characteristics and financial circumstances of Temporary Assistance to Needy Families recipients. Retrieved October 22, 2007, from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofa/annualreport6/chapter10/chap.
33.
WeilA., & FinegoldK. (Eds.). (2002). Welfare reform: The next act.Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
