This article examines how social workers and clients construe their views of poverty. It presents findings of a qualitative study of worker and client perceptions of poverty done in Jerusalem. The study found many similarities in their views of poverty, but also revealed that client views of poverty causality are structural, whereas staff views rest on individual, “culture of poverty theory” approaches. The study shows the complexity of these views and exposes the situational, contextual, interpretive, and discursive nature of these constructions. The article encourages agencies to raise staff awareness regarding the structural aspects of client problems, increase the cultural and gender sensitivity training of the staff, and cultivate a critical dialog with clients as a platform to build enduring alliances.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsP., & NelsonK (1995). Re-inventing human services: Community and family centered practice. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
2.
AckersonB. J., & HarrisonW. D. (2000). Practitioners’ perceptions of empowerment.Families in Society, 81(3), 238–244.
3.
AjzenstadtM., & GalJ (2001). Appearances can be deceptive: Gender in the Israeli welfare state.Social Politics, 8(3), 292–324.
4.
AllenJ., CopelloA., & OrfordJ. (2005). Fear during alcohol detoxification: Views from the clients’ perspective.Journal of Health Psychology, 10(4), 503–510.
5.
AlpertL. T., & BritnerP. A. (2005). Social workers’ attitudes toward clients of children in child protective services: Evaluation of a family-focused casework training program.Journal of Family Social Work, 9(1), 33–64.
6.
AtzmonY., & IzraeliD. (1993) Women in Israel. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
7.
AuslanderG., & ItzikD (1997). Factors related to congruence between social worker and client problem definition in an acute care hospital.Journal of Social Service Research, 22(4), 19–38.
8.
BrysonV. (1996). Women and citizenship: Some lessons from Israel, Political Studies, 44(4), 704-718.
9.
BuchbinderE., EisikovitsZ., & Karnieli-MillerO. (2004). Social workers’ perceptions of the balance between the psychological and the social.Social Service Review, 78(4), 531–552.
10.
BullockH. (1999). Attributions for poverty: A comparison of middleclass and welfare recipient attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 29(10), 2059-2082.
11.
BullockH., & LimbertW (2003). Scaling the socioeconomic ladder: Low-income women's perceptions of class, status, and opportunity.Journal of Social Issues, 59(4), 693–709.
12.
BullockH., WilliamsW., & LimbertW. (2003). Predicting support for welfare policies: The impact of attributions and beliefs about inequality.Journal of Poverty, 7(3), 35–56.
13.
CampbellC. (1999). Empowering pedagogy: Experiential education in the social work classroom.Canadian Social Work Review, 16(1), 35–48.
14.
CampbellC. (2002). The search for congruency: Developing strategies for anti-oppressive social work pedagogy. Canadian Social Work Review, 19(1), 25-42.
15.
CampbellC. (2003). Principles and practices of anti-oppressive pedagogy as represented by Dr. Terri Swice. In SheraW. (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on anti-oppressive practice (pp. 393–411). Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press.
16.
Central Bureau of Statistics. (2002). Income Survey 2001. Jerusalem: Author.
17.
CorbinJ., & StraussA (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria.Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.
18.
DalrympleJ., & BurkeB (1995). Some essential elements of antioppressive theory. In DalrympleJ. & BurkeB. (Eds.), Anti-oppressive practice: Social care and the law (pp. 7–21). Buckingham: Open University Press.
19.
DanzigerS. K., & SeefeldtK. S. (2000). Ending welfare through work first: Manager and clients views.Families in Society, 81(6), 593–604.
20.
DarlingR. B. (1991). Clients-professional interaction: The roots of misunderstanding. In SeligmanM. (Ed.), The family with a handicapped child (pp. 119–149). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
21.
DarlingR. B. (2000). The partnership model in human services: Sociological foundations and practices. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
22.
DaughertyR., & BarberG (2001). Self-sufficiency, ecology of work, and welfare reform.Social Service Review, 75(4), 662–75.
23.
de SwaanA., ManorJ., OyenE., & ReisE. (2000). Elite perceptions of the poor: Reflections for comparative research project.Current Sociology, 48(1), 43–58.
24.
DellgranP., & HojerS (2005). Privatisation as professionalisation? Attitudes, motives and achievements among Swedish social workers.European Journal of Social Work, 8(1), 39–62.
25.
DominelliL. (1988). Anti-racist social work. London: Macmillan.
26.
DominelliL. (1994). Anti-racist perspectives in the social work curriculum. In DominelliL., PatelN., & BernardW. T. (Eds.), Anti-racist social work education: Models of practice (pp. 22–35). Sheffield, UK: University of Sheffield.
27.
DominelliL. (1996). Deprofessionalizing social work: Anti-oppressive practice, competencies, postmodernism.British Journal of Social Work, 26, 153–175.
28.
DominelliL. (1998). Anti-oppressive practice in context. In AdamsR., DominelliL., & PayneM. (Eds.), Social work: Themes, issues and critical debates (pp. 3–22). Houndmills, Basinstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
DoronA. (2001). Social welfare policy in Israel: Developments in the 1980s and 1990s.Israel Affairs, 7(4), 153–180.
30.
DoronA. (2003). The Israeli welfare regime: Changing trends and their social effects. Israeli Sociology: Journal for the Study of Israeli Society, 5(2), 417-434 [Translated from Hebrew].
31.
FookJ. (2002). Social work: Critical theory and practice. London: Sage.
32.
FreundA. (2005). Work attitudes of social workers across three sectors of welfare organizations: Public, for-profit, and third sector.Journal of Social Service Research, 31(3), 69–92.
33.
GuttmannD., & CohenBen-Zion (1992). Teaching about poverty in Israeli schools of social work.International Social Work, 35(1), 49–63.
34.
HarrisC. (2002). Who supports welfare reform and why.Race, Gender, and Class, 9(1), 96–121.
35.
HazletonL. (1977). Israeli women. The reality behind the myths. New York: Simon & Shuster.
36.
Welfare recipients’ views of the success of welfare reform in rural Appalachia. Poverty Research News: Newsletter of the Northwestern University/University of Chicago Joint Center for Poverty Research, 6(4), 9–11.
37.
HentschelJ., & WatersW (2002). Rural poverty in Ecuador: Assessing local realities for the development of anti-poverty programs.World Development, 30(1), 33–47.
38.
HodgeD. R. (2004). Who we are, where we come from, and some of our perceptions: Comparison of social workers and the general population.Social Work, 49(2), 261–268.
39.
KagleJ. D., & CowgerC. G. (1984). Blaming the client: Implicit agenda in practice research?Social Work, 29, 347–351.
40.
KleinU. (2002). The gender perspective of civil-military relations in Israel society. Current Sociology. 50(5), 669–686.
41.
Krumer-NevoM., & Lev-WieselR. (2005). Attitudes of social work students toward clients with basic needs. Journal of Social Work Education, 41(3), 545-556.
42.
LeonardP. (1995). Postmodernism, socialism and social welfare.Journal of Progressive Human Services, 6(2), 3–19.
LeonardP. (2001). The future of critical social work in uncertain conditions.Critical Social Work, 2(1). http://www.criticalsocialwork.com.
45.
LissakM. (1998). The state of Israel: The first decades. In ShinanA. (Ed.), Israel, land, people, state: A nation and its homeland.Jerusalem: Yad Izhak Ben-Zvi. (in Hebrew).
46.
MercerJ. R. (1965). Social system perspective and clinical perspective: Frame of reference for understanding career patterns of persons labeled as mentally retarded. Social Problems, 13, 18–34.
47.
MutschlerE. & RosenA. (1979). Evaluation of treatment outcome by client and social worker. Social Welfare Forum, 106, 156–161.
48.
NarayanD., PatelR., SchafftK., RademacherA., & Koch-SchulteS. (2000). Voices of the poor: Can any one hear us?World Bank, New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
NarayanD. & PeteschP. (2002). Voices of the poor: From many lands.World Bank. New York: Oxford University Press.
50.
NelsonG., PrilleltenskyI., & MacGillivaryH. (2001). Building valuebased partnerships: Toward solidarity with oppressed groups. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(5), 649–677.
51.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
ReeserL. C., & EpsteinI. (1987). Social workers’ attitudes toward poverty and social action: 1968-1984.Social Service Review, 61(4), 612–622.
53.
RehnerT., IsheeJ., SalloumM., & VelasuesD. (1997). Mississippi social workers’ attitudes toward poverty and the poor.Journal of Social Work Education, 1(33), 131–142.
54.
RosenA. (1993). Corrections of worker's personal versus environmental bias in formulation of client problems.Social Service Review, 66, 85–96.
55.
RosenthalB S. (1993). Graduate social work students’ beliefs about poverty and attitudes toward the poor.Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 7(1), 107–121.
56.
SandfortJ., KalilA., & GottschalkJ. (1999). The mirror has two faces: Welfare clients and front line workers view policy reforms.Journal of Poverty, 3(3), 71–91.
57.
SchramS. (2000). After welfare: The culture of postindustrial social policy. New York: New York University Press.
58.
SchramS. (2005). Welfare discipline: Discourse, governance, and globalization. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
59.
SchwartzS., & RobinsonM (1991). Attitudes toward poverty during undergraduate education.Journal of Social Work Education, 27(3), 290–296.
60.
ShamaiM., & SharlinS (1996). Who writes the “therapeutic story” of families in extreme distress: Overcoming the coalition of despair.Journal of Family Social Work, 1(4), 65–82.
61.
ShawG., & ShapiroR (2002). The polls trends: Poverty and public assistance.Public Opinion Quarterly, 66(1), 105–128.
62.
SlovakK., JosephA. L.Jr. & BroussardA. (2006). School social workers’ perceptions of graduate education preparation.Children & Schools, 28(2), 97–105.
63.
SungK. (1989). Converging perspectives of consumers and providers in assessing needs of families.Journal of Social Service Research, 12, 1–29.
64.
SwankE. (2004). Welfare spending preferences among social work students: Analyzing the importance of class, race, and gender beliefs.Arete, 28(1), 1–20.
65.
TamS. Y., & TangC. S. (2005). Comparing wife abuse perceptions between Chinese police officers and social workers.Journal of Family Violence, 20(1), 29–38.
66.
WalshJ., GreenR., MatthewsJ., & Bonucelli-PuertoB. (2005). Social workers’ views of the etiology of mental disorders: Results of a national study.Social Work, 50(1), 43–52.
67.
WeissI. (2003). Social work students and social change: On the links between views on poverty, social work goals, and policy practice.International Journal of Social Welfare, 12(2), 132–141.
68.
WeissI. (2004). Social work students’ attitudes toward poverty: International comparative view.Social Security, 66, 35-62 [Translated from Hebrew].
69.
WeissI. (2005a). Is there a global common core to social work? A crossnational comparative study of BSW graduate students.Social Work, 50(2), 101–110.
70.
WeissI. (2005b). Service user group preferences of social work students in seven countries.Journal of Social Work Research and Evaluation, 6(1), 121–136.
71.
WoodcockJ., & DixonJ (2005). Professional ideologies and preferences in social work: A British study in global perspective. British Journal of Social Work, 35(6), 953-973.
