Developments in genetic technologies have made it possible to test for a variety of genetic disorders in children. The increased availability of genetic testing has put pressure on adoption agencies to provide genetic testing of pre-adoptive children. This paper examines the current policy on pre-adoptive genetic testing of children and proposed changes in the policy raised by key policy makers on medical genetics. These policy makers call for substantial restrictions on pre-adoptive genetic testing of all children available for adoption and ignore the potential positive outcomes that such testing could make in finding suitable adoptive families for hard-to-place children. It is recommended that pre-adoptive genetic testing be expanded to include children with special needs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Society of Human Genetics & American College of Medical Genetics. (2000). Genetic testing in adoption.American Journal of Human Genetics, 66(3), 761–767.
2.
AndrewsL. (1997). Body science. American Bar Association Journal, 89(44–49).
3.
AndrewsL. B., & ElsterN. (1998). Adoption, reproductive technologies and genetic information.Health Matrix: Journal of Law-Medicine, 8, 125.
4.
BartholetE. (1993). Family bonds: Adoption and the politics of parenting. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
5.
CarsonR. A., & RothsteinM. A. (Eds.). (1999). Behavioral genetics: The clash of culture and biology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
6.
ClarkeS. (2000, May 1). Life is a jungle of inequalities. The Wall Street Journal, p. A35.
7.
ConnellyS. W. (1991). The need for disclosure laws: A survey of the wrongful-adoption cause of action and statutory remedies for adoption fraud.The Review of Litigation, 10, 793–797.
DohertyP., & SuttonA. (Eds.). (1997). Man-made man: Ethical and legal issues in genetics. Portland, OR: Open Air Press.
10.
FostN. (1984). Disclosing genetic information to adoptive parents: Ethical considerations. Genetic family history: an aid to better health of adoptive children (pp. 50–55). Washington, DC: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health.
11.
FreundlichM. D. (1998). The case against pre-adoption genetic testing.Child Welfare, 77, 663–679.
12.
GliddenL. M., & CahillB. M. (1998). Successful adoption of children with Down syndrome and other developmental disabilities.Adoption Quarterly, 1, 27–43.
13.
JacobsM. A. (1998, December 7). Are adoption agencies liable for not telling all? The Wall Street Journal, p. B1.
14.
JansenL. A., & RossL. F. (2001). The ethics of pre-adoption genetic testing.American Journal of Medical Genetics, 104, 214–220.
15.
KleimanE. L. (1997). Why American adoption law and policy must change.Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 30, 327–368.
16.
LombardoP. (1996) Genetic confidentiality: What's the big secret? University of Chicago Law School Roundtable, 3, 589–614.
McDonald-NunemakerP. (1994). Wrongful adoption, the development of a better remedy in tort.Journal of American Academy of Matrimonial Law, 12, 391–392.
19.
MoonM. (1999). Genetic testing of adoptees poses new dilemmas. Pediatric News, 33(2), 46.
20.
National Association of Social Workers. (2000). Code of Ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. Washington, DC: Author.
21.
NippertI., NeitzelH., & WolffG. (Eds.). (1999). The new genetics: From research into health care, social and ethical implications for users and providers. New York: Springer.
22.
PetersT. (1996). In search of the perfect child: Genetic testing and selective abortion.The Christian Century, 113(31), 1034–1037.
23.
PetersT. (Ed.). (1998). Genetics: Issues of social justice. Cleveland, OH: The Pilgrim Press.
24.
PlumridgeD., BurnsJ., & FisherN. L. (1990). ASHG activities relative to education: Heredity and adoption: A survey of state adoption agencies.American Journal of Human Genetics, 46, 208–214.
25.
RawlsJ. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
26.
RosenthalJ. A. (1993). Outcomes of adoption of children with special needs. The Future of Children, 3, 77-89.
27.
RothsteinM. A. (Ed.). (1997). Genetic secrets. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28.
RothsteinM., & PeliasM (2000). Joint Statement of the American Society of Human Genetics and the American College of Medical Genetics. Prepared by the social issues committee of the ASHG and the legal issues committee of the ACMG. Quoted in Rothstein, M. A. (2000). Unpublished manuscript for his genetics and the law class taught spring 2000 at University of Houston College of Law, Houston, Texas.
29.
SapolskyR. (2000). It's not ‘all in the genes.’ Newsweek, 135(15), 68.
30.
SmithJ. F. (2002). A cautionary tale on genetic testing: The case of foster and pre-adoptive children. Boston: McCormack Institute of Public Affairs.
31.
TaylorS. (1998). A case study of genetic discrimination: Social work and advocacy within a new context.Australian Social Work, 51(4), 51–57.
32.
Taylor-BrownS., & JohnsonA. M. (1998). Social work's role in genetic services. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.
33.
VacchianoE. (1999). It's a wonderful genome: The written-description requirement protects the human genome from overly-broad patents comment.John Marshall Law Review, 32, 805.
34.
VallianatosC. (2000). Social workers prepare for the genetics era. NASW News, 10, 3.
35.
VanceA. (2000). The importance of a genetic family history for adoptees.Geneletter, 1, 7.
36.
WilkieT. (1993). Perilous knowledge. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
37.
YostD. M., HochstadtN. J., & CharlesP. (1988). Medical foster care: Achieving permanency for seriously ill children. Children Today: 17, 22-26.
