Psychiatric advance directives (PADs) are legal documents that allow competent individuals to express wishes for psychiatric care during a future crisis when they may no longer be able to do so. PADs are intended to enhance client autonomy at a time when clients are most vulnerable—when in psychiatric crisis and thus in need of treatment, yet unable to voice their wishes because of illness. Despite their potential utility, PADs are infrequently used. Using data from an exploratory survey (N = 193), we examined social workers' familiarity and experience with PADs and found surprisingly low levels of PAD awareness and experience. We discuss the implications of these findings for social work research, practice, and education, and we offer recommendations for future study.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmeringM., DenkE., GrienglH., SibitzL., & StastnyP. (1999). Psychiatric wills and mental health professionals: A survey of opinions regarding advance directives in psychiatry. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 34, 30–34.
2.
AmeringM., StastnyP., & HopperK. (2005). Psychiatric advance directives: Qualitative study of informed deliberations by mental health service users. British Journal of Psychiatry, 186, 247–252.
3.
AppelbaumP. (2004). Psychiatric advance directives and the treatment of committed patients. Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 55(7), 751–763.
4.
ArrigoB., & WilliamsC (1999). Chaos theory and the social control thesis: A post-Foucauldian analysis of mental illness and involuntary civil confinement. Social Justice, 26(1), 177–180.
5.
AtkinsonJ., GarnerH., & GilmourW. (2004). Models of advance directive in mental health care: Stakeholder views. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39, 673–680.
6.
BacklarP. (1995). The longing for order: Oregon's Medical Advance Directive for Mental Health Treatment. Community Mental Health Journal, 33(4), 261–268.
7.
BacklarP. (2004). Anticipatory planning for psychiatric treatment: Liberty or limitation for our future plans?Journal of Forensic Psychology, 4(4), 83–95.
8.
BacklarP., & McFarlandB (1998). Oregon's advance directive for mental health treatment: Implications for policy. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 25(6), 609–618.
9.
BacklarP., McFarlandB., SwansonJ., & MahlerJ. (2001). Consumer, provider, and informal caregiver opinion of psychiatric advance directives. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 28(6), 427–441.
10.
BrownJ. (2003). Is involuntary outpatient commitment a remedy for community mental health service failure?Ethical Human Sciences and Services, 5(1), 7–20.
11.
CarpenterJ. (2002a). Mental health recovery paradigm. Health and Social Work, 27(2), 86–94.
12.
CarpenterJ. (2002b). Outpatient commitment for adults with psychiatric disabilities: Examining the underlying assumptions. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 83(3), 293–302.
13.
ChristensenR. (1997). Ethical issues in community mental health: Cases and conflicts. Community Mental Health Journal, 33(1), 5–11.
14.
DallaireB., McCubbinM., MorinP., & CohenD. (2000). Civil commitment due to mental illness and dangerousness: The union of law and psychiatry within a treatment-control system. Sociology of Health and Illness, 22(5), 679–699.
15.
DavittJ., & KayeL (1996). Supporting patient autonomy: Decision making in home health care. Social Work, 41(1), 41–50.
16.
DeeganP. (1997). Recovery and empowerment for people with psychiatric disorders. Social Work in Health Care, 25(3), 11–24.
17.
Duke University Medical Center and the Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law. (2006). National resource center on psychiatric advance directives. Retrieved April 20, 2006, from http://www.nrc-pad.org/index.php.
18.
ElbogenE., SwartzM., Van DornR., SwansonJ., KimM., & ScheyettA. (2006). Clinician decision-making and views about psychiatric advance directives. Psychiatric Services, 57, 350–355.
19.
HendersonC., FloodC., LeeseM., ThornicroftG., SutherbyK., & SzmucklerG. (2004). Effects of joint crisis plans on use of compulsory treatment in psychiatry: Single blind randomized controlled trial. Retrieved October 10, 2004, from http://www.njm.38155585046.63.
20.
HoweE. (2000). Lessons from advance directives for PADs. Psychiatry, 63(2), 173–177.
Kaltiala-HeinoR., LaippalaP., & SalokangasR. (1997). Impact of coercion on treatment outcomes. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 20(3), 311–322.
23.
KimM., ScheyettA., ElbogenE., Van DornR., McDanielL., SwartzM., SwansonJ., & FerronJ. (2008). Front line workers’ attitudes towards psychiatric advance directives. Community Mental Health Journal, 44(1), 28–46.
24.
KiselyS., XiaoJ., & PrestonN. (2004). Impact of compulsory community treatment on admission rates. British Journal of Psychiatry, 184, 432–438.
25.
ManderscheidR. W., & HendersonM. J. (2001). Mental Health, United States, 2000: Center for Mental Health Services DHHS Pub No. (SMA) 01-3537. Washington, DC: U.S.
26.
Government Printing Office. MillerR. (1998). Advance directives for psychiatric treatment: A view from the trenches. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law, 4(3), 728-745.
27.
MowbrayC., & HolterM (2002). Mental health and mental illness: Out of the closet?Social Service Review, 76(1), 135–179.
28.
National Association of Social Workers. (1999). Code of Ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. Washington, DC: Author.
29.
O'ConnellM., & SteinC. (2005). Psychiatric advance directives: Perspectives of community stakeholders. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 32(3), 241–265.
30.
OfferJ. (1999). Social workers, the community and social interaction: Intervention and the sociology of welfare. London: Jessica Kingsley.
31.
PapageorgiouA., KingM., JanmohamedA., DavidsonO., & DawsonJ. (2002). Advance directives for patients compulsorily admitted to hospital with serious mental illness. British Journal of Psychiatry, 181, 513–519.
32.
RitchieJ., SklarR., & SteinerW. (1998). Advance directives in psychiatry. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 21(3), 245–260.
33.
RothmanJ. (1998). From the front lines: Student cases in social work ethics. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
34.
SrebnikD., & LaFondJ (1999). Advance directives for mental health treatment. Psychiatric Services, 50(7), 919–925.
35.
SrebnikD., RussoJ., SageJ., PetoT., & ZickE. (2003). Interest in psychiatric advance directives among high users of crisis services and hospitalization. Psychiatric Services, 54(7), 981–986.
36.
SutherbyK., SzmucklerG., HalpernA., AlexanderM., ThornicroftG., JohnsonC., (1999). A study of ‘crisis cards’ in a community psychiatric service. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 100, 56–61.
37.
SwansonJ., SwartzM., ElbogenE., Van DornR., WagnerH., McCauleyB., (2006). Facilitated psychiatric advance directives: A randomized trial of an intervention to foster advance treatment planning among persons with severe mental illness. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 1942–1951.
38.
SwansonJ., SwartzM., FerronJ., ElbogenE., & Van DornR. (2006). Psychiatric advance directives among public mental health consumers in five U.S. cities: Prevalence, demand, and correlates. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 34, 43–57.
39.
SwansonJ., TepperM., BacklarP., & SwartzM. (2000). Psychiatric advance directives: An alternative to coercive treatment?Psychiatry, 63(2), 160–172.
40.
SwartzM., SwansonJ., & ElbogenE. (2004). Psychiatric advance directives: Practical, legal, and ethical issues. Journal of Forensic Psychology, 4(4), 97–103.
41.
SwartzM., SwansonJ., & HannonM. (2003). Does fear of coercion keep people away from mental health treatment? Evidence from a survey of persons with schizophrenia and mental health professionals. Behavioral Science and the Law, 21, 459–472.
42.
WiddershovenG., & BerghmansR (2001). Advance directives in psychiatric care: A narrative approach. Journal of Medical Ethics, 27, 92–97.
43.
WinnickB. (1996). Advance directive instruments for those with mental illness. University of Miami Law Review, 51(57), 1–33.
