This study reports on a survey of 220 randomly selected MFTs and LCSWs about nonsexual dual relationships. The purpose was to investigate whether therapists were engaging in dual relationships and whether their beliefs and behaviors differed based on particular characteristics. Nearly one-third of the respondents had provided individual therapy to a friend, relative, or lover of a current client, disclosed details of their own personal stresses to clients, or accepted client invitations to special occasions. Over three-quarters had accepted small gifts from clients. Yet the majority viewed these relationships as unethical. Results imply that little consensus exists about nonsexual dual relationships, and therapists need to be vigilant in terms of potential risks to clients and to themselves.
American Psychiatric Association. (1989). The principles of medical ethics. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 46, 1597–1611.
4.
BogradM. (1992). The duel over dual relationships. Networker, 16 (6), 32-37.
5.
BorysD., & PopeK (1989). Dual relationships between therapist and client: A national study of psychologists, psychiatrists, and social workers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 20, 283–293.
6.
CampbellC., & GordonM (2003). Acknowledging the inevitable: Understanding multiple relationships in rural practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 430–434.
7.
CarlsonL., RappC., & McDiarmidD. (2001). Hiring consumerproviders: Barriers and alternative solutions. Community Mental Health Journal, 37, 199–213.
FreudS., & KrugS (2002). Beyond the code of ethics, part II: Dual relationships revisited. Families in Society, 83(5/6), 483–492.
10.
GartrellN., HermanJ., OlarteS., FeldsteinM., & LocalioR. (1987). Psychiatrist-patient sexual contact: Results of a national survey, I: Prevalence. American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 1126–1131.
11.
GlaserR., & ThorpeJ (1986). Unethical intimacy: A survey of sexual contact and advances between psychology educators and female graduate students. American Psychologist, 41, 43–51.
12.
HelbokC., MarinelliR., & WallsR. (2006). National survey of ethical practices across rural and urban communities. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37, 36–44.
13.
HerlihyB., & CoreyG (1992). Dual relationships in counseling. Alexandria, VA: American Association for Counseling and Development.
14.
HolroydJ., & BrodskyA (1977). Psychologists’ attitudes and practices regarding erotic and nonerotic physical contact with patients. American Psychologist, 32, 843–849.
15.
KagleJ., & GiebelhausenP (1994). Dual relationships and professional boundaries. Social Work, 39, 213–220.
16.
KesslerL., & WaehlerC (2005). Addressing multiple relationships between clients and therapists in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender communities. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 66–72.
17.
KnoxS., HessS., Nutt WilliamsE., & HillC. (2003). “Here's a little something for you”: How therapists respond to client gifts. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 199–210.
18.
LambD., & CatanzaroS (1998). Sexual and nonsexual boundary violations involving psychologists, clients, supervisees, and students: Implications for practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29, 498–503.
19.
LambD., CatanzaroS., & MoormanA. (2003). Psychologists reflect on their sexual relationships with clients, supervisees, and students: Occurrence, impact, rationales, and collegial intervention. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 102–107.
20.
LazarusA., & ZurO (2002). Dual relationships and psychotherapy. New York: Springer.
21.
MillerP. (1994). Dual relationships in rural practice: A dilemma of ethics and culture. Human Services in the Rural Environment, 18(2), 3–7.
22.
National Association of Social Workers. (1996). Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. Washington, DC: Author.
23.
National Federation of Societies for Clinical Social Work. (1988). Code of ethics. Arlington, VA: Author.
24.
PetersonC. (1996). Common problem areas and their causes resulting in disciplinary actions. In BassL. J., DeMersS. T., OgloffJ. R. PPetersonC.PettiforJ. L.ReavesR. P., (Eds), Professional conduct and discipline in psychology (71-89). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25.
PopeK., Keith-SpiegelP., & TabachnickB. (1986). Sexual attraction to clients: The human psychologist and the (sometimes) inhuman training system. American Psychologist, 41, 147–158.
26.
PopeK., TabachnickB., & Keith-SpeigelP. (1987). Ethics of practice: The beliefs and behaviors of psychologists as therapists. American Psychologist, 42, 993–1006.
27.
PopeK., & VetterV (1991). Prior therapist-patient sexual involvement among patients seen by psychologists. Psychotherapy, 28, 429–438.
ReamerF. (2003). Boundary issues in social work: Managing dual relationships. Social Work, 48, 121–133.
30.
SimonR. (1989). Sexual exploitation of patients: How it begins before it happens. Contemporary Psychiatry, 19, 104–112.
31.
St. GermaineJ. (1996). Dual relationships and certified alcohol and drug counselors: A national study of ethical beliefs and behaviors. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 14(2), 29–44.
32.
Strom-GottfriedK. (2000). Understanding adjudication: Origins, targets, and outcomes of ethics complaints. Social Work, 48, 85–94.
33.
YoungrenJ., & GottliebM (2004). Managing risk when contemplating multiple relationships. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 255–260.
