As social work advances into the 21st century, dramatic increases in the aging of the U.S. population, shifting policy imperatives, and the emergence of new technologies have transformed the professional landscape in which social workers operate. To survive in today's world, social workers must be able to learn new skills and adapt to change. This article reviews the challenges facing the profession in transferring practice skills to social workers and describes the strategies of the Institute for Geriatric Social Work (IGSW) that address them. Well-designed training should provide a learning experience that is affordable, accessible and grounded in skill-based competencies. The challenge facing IGSW—and the broader social work community—is how to promote continuing education that maximizes these ends.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaldwinT., & FordJ. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for further research. Personnel Psychology, 41, 63–105.
2.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2004). Occupational outlook handbook, 2004-05 edition, social workers. Retrieved November 12, 2004, from http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos060.htm.
CerveroR. M. (2000). Trends and issues in continuing professional education. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 86, 3–12.
5.
ClarkeN. (2002). Job/work environment factors influencing training transfer within a human service agency: Some support for Baldwin and Ford's transfer climate construct. International Journal of Training and Development, 6, 146–162.
6.
Council on Social Work Education. (2002). Statistics on social work education in the United States: 2000. Washington, DC: Author.
7.
CurryD. H., CaplanP., & KnuppelJ. (1994). Transfer of training and adult learning (TOTAL). Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 6(1), 8–14.
8.
DaleyB. J. (2000). Learning in professional practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 86, 33–42.
9.
DaleyB. J. (2001). Learning and professional practice: A study of four professions. Adult Education Quarterly, 52, 39–54.
10.
Damron-RodriguezJ., & CorleyC. S. (2002). Social work education for interdisciplinary practice with older adults and their families. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 39(1/2), 37–55.
11.
DavenportJ. (1992). Continuing social work education: The empirical base and practice guidelines. Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 5(3), 27–30.
12.
DravesW. A. (2002). Teaching online. River Falls, WI: Lern Books.
13.
GaravagliaP. (1993). How to ensure transfer of training. Training and Development, 47, 63–68.
14.
GibelmanM., & SchervishP. H. (1997). Who we are: A second look. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
15.
GonyeaJ. G., HudsonR. B., & CurleyA. (2004). The geriatric social work labor force: Challenges and opportunities in responding to an aging society. Boston: Institute for Geriatric Social Work.
16.
GranottN. (1998). We learn, therefore we develop: Learning versus development—or developing learning? In M. C. Smith & T. Pourchot (Eds.), Adult learning and development: Perspectives from educational psychology (pp. 15–34). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
HansmanC. A. (2001). Mentoring as continuing professional education. Adult Learning, 12(1), 7–8.
18.
HooymanN., & KiyakH (1999). Social gerontology (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
19.
JohnsonS. D., & AragonS. R. (2003). An instructional strategy framework for online learning environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 100, 31–41.
20.
KemererR.W. (1991). Understanding the application of learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 49, 67–80.
21.
KirkpatrickD. L. (1998). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
22.
KnowlesM. (1978). The adult learner: A neglected species (2nd ed.). Houston: Gulf Publishing.
23.
MerriamS. B. (2001). Andragogy and self-directed learning: Pillars of adult learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 89, 3–13.
24.
MottV. (2000). The development of professional expertise in the workplace. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 86, 23–31.
OttosonJ. M. (2000). Evaluation of continuing professional education: Toward a theory of our own. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 86, 43–53.
28.
RosenA. L., & ZlotnickJ. L. (2001). Social work's response to the growing older population. Generations, 25(1), 69–71.
29.
RosenA., ZlotnickJ., CurlA., & GreenR. (2000). The CSWE/SAGE-SW National Aging Competencies Survey Report. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
30.
SalasE., & Cannon-BowersJ. A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471–499.
31.
ScharlachA., Damron-RodriguezJ., RobinsonB., & FeldmanR. (2000). Educating social workers for an aging society: A vision for the 21st century. Journal of Social Work Education, 36, 521–538.
32.
ShinS. H., WehrmannK., & PoertnerJ. (1999). An evaluation of clinical practice training transfer. Urbana: University of Illinois.
33.
StromK., & GreenR (1995). Continuing education. In EdwardsR. L. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social work (19th ed., pp. 622–632). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
34.
WelshE. T., WanbergC. R., BrownK. G., & SimmeringM. J. (2003). Elearning: Emerging uses, empirical results, and future directions. International Journal of Training and Development, 7, 245–258.
35.
WhitakerT., WeismillerT., & SmithM. (2004, October). Survey data show earnings increased. NASW News, 49(9), 1,8.
