BaroneT. E. (1994). On Kozol and Sartre and educational research as socially committed literature. Review of Education/Pedagogy/Cultural Studies, 16(1), 93–102.
2.
BlytheB., TnpodiT., & BriarS. (1994). Direct practice research in human service agencies.New York: Columbia University Press.
3.
BorkoH., & LivingstonC. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 473–498.
4.
BriarS. (1973). Effective social work intervention in direct practice: Implications for education. In BriarS., CannonW. B., GinsbergL. H., HornS., & SarriR. L. (Eds.). Facing the challenge (pp. 17–30). New York: Council on Social Work Education.
5.
CarterK. (1993, January–February). The place of story in the study of teaching and teacher education. Educational Researcher, 22, 5–12.
6.
EmyH. V. (1989). From a positive to a cultural science: Towards a new rationale for political studies. Political Studies, 2, 188–217.
7.
EpsteinL. (1996). The trouble with the researcher–practitioner idea. Social Work Research, 20(2), 113–199.
8.
FischerJ. (1978). Effective casework practice: An eclectic approach.New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
FranklinC., & JordonC. (1995). Qualitative assessment: A methodological review. Families in Society, 76, 281–295.
10.
FranklinD. L. (1986). Mary Richmond and Jane Addams: From moral certainty to rational inquiry in social work practice. Social Service Review, 60, 504–525.
11.
FraserM., LewisR. E., & NormanJ. L. (1991). Research education in M.S.W. Programs: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 4(2), 83–103.
12.
GilgunJ. R. (1992). Hypothesis generation in social work research. Journal of Social Service Research, 15(3-4), 113–135.
13.
GilgunJ. F. (1994). A case for case studies in social work research. Social Work, 39, 371–380.
14.
GingerichW.J. (1984). Generalizing single-case evaluation from classroom to practice setting. Journal of Education for Social Work, 20, 70–82.
15.
HeinemanM. B. (1981). The obsolete scientific imperative in social work research. Social Service Review, 55, 371–397.
16.
Heineman-PieperM. B. (1985). The future of social work research. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 21, 3–11.
17.
HoweM. W. (1974). Casework self-evaluation: A single-subject approach. Social Service Review, 48, 1–23.
18.
KagleJ. D. (1982). Using single-subject measures in practice decisions: Systematic documentation or distortion?Arete, 7(2), 1–9.
19.
KleinW. C., & BloomM. (1995). Practice wisdom. Social Work, 40, 799–807.
20.
MarchJ. G., & SimonH. A. (1958). Organizations.New York: John Wiley.
21.
MeyerC. H. (1993). Assessment in social work.New York: Columbia University Press.
22.
MeyerC. H. (1996). My son the scientist. Social Work Research, 20(2), 101–104.
23.
MutschlerE. (1984). Evaluating practice: A study of research utilization by practitioners. Social Work, 29, 332–337.
24.
PenkaC. E., & KirkS. A. (1991). Practitioner involvement in clinical evaluation. Social Work, 36, 513–518.
25.
RaimyV. C. (Ed.). (1950). Training in clinical psychology.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prenrice-Hall.
26.
ReidW. (1994). The empirical practice movement. Social Service Review, 68, 165–184.
27.
RicheyC. A., BlytheB. J., & BerlinS. B. (1987). Do social workers evaluate their practice?Social Work Research and Abstracts, 23(2), 14–20.
28.
RichmondM. (1917). Social diagnosis.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
29.
RiessmanC. K. (1993). Narrative analysis.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
RiessmanC. K. (Ed.). (1994). Qualitative studies in social work research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
RobinsonE., BronsonD., & BlytheB. (1988). An analysis of the implementation of single evaluations by practitioners. Social Service Review, 62, 285–301.
32.
RodwellM. K. (1987). Naturalistic inquiry: An alternative model or social work assessment. Social Service Review, 61, 231–246.
33.
RuckdeschelR. A., & FarrisB. E. (1981). Assessing practice: A critical look at the single-case design. Social Casework, 62, 413–419.
34.
SaleebeyD. (1979). The tension between research and practice: Assumptions of the experimental paradigm. Clinical Social Work Journal, 7, 267–284.
35.
SaleebeyD. (1994). Culture, theory, and narrative: The intersection of meanings in practice. Social Work, 39, 351–359.
36.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38.
TierneyL. (1993). Practice research and social work education. Australian Social Work, 46(2), 9–22.
39.
ThomasE. J. (1978). Research and service in single-case experimentation: Conflicts and choices. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 14(4), 20–31.
40.
ThompsonJ. D. (1967). Organizations in action.New York: McGraw-Hill.
41.
WakefieldJ. C., & KirkS. A. (1996). Unscientific thinking about scientific practice: Evaluating the scientist–practitioner model. Social Work Research, 20(2), 83–96.
42.
WeickA. (1987). Reconceptualizing the philosophical perspective of social work. Social Services Review, 61, 218–230.
43.
WeickA. (1991). The place of science in social work. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 18(4), 13–34.
44.
WeickK. E. (1993). The collapse of sense-making in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628–652.
45.
WelshG. J. (1983). Will graduates use single-subject designs to evaluate their casework practice?Journal of Social Work Education, 19(2), 42–47.
46.
WhiteM., & EpsonD. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends.New York: W. W. Norton.
47.
WitkinS. L. (1991). Empirical clinical practice: A critical analysis. Social Work, 36, 158–163.
48.
WitkinS. L. (1996). If empirical practice is the answer, then what is the question?Social Work Research, 20(2), 69–76.
