This study examined the extent and sources of social support of Chinese and Malay Muslim mothers of children with intellectual disability in Singapore and attempted to expand the understanding of relationship-based perceptions of social support in these 2 population groups. Analysis of 6 areas, namely, informational, emotional, social, financial, childcare, and practical needs showed that Chinese mothers have a larger and more diversified network of perceived social support than their Malay Muslim counterparts. Discussion includes the role of cultural variables in the perception of social support network, the role of relationship strength in perceived social support, and strategies for enhancing the mental well-being and coping of Asian mothers of children with intellectual disability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abul A'la Al-Maududi. (1981). Towards understanding Islam. Singapore: Pustaka Nasional Singapore.
2.
AliM. (1998). The family's influence on religious orientation of women in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work, 8, 16–29.
3.
AuE., ChiuC., & RudowiczE. (1995). Chinese family and market economy. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work, 5, 79–94.
4.
BlacherJ., NihiraK., & MeyersC. E. (1987). Characteristics of home environment of families with mentally retarded children: Comparisons across levels of retardation. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 91, 318–320.
5.
BlakeM. L. (1991). The portability of family therapy to different cultural and socio-economic contexts. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work, 1, 32–60.
6.
ChanC. L.W., & ChanE. K. L. (2001). Enhancing resilience and family health in the Asian context. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work, 11, 5–17.
7.
ChangW. C., & WongK.W. (1993). Chinese values and need for achievement. (Working Paper No. 29). Department of Social Work and Psychology, National University of Singapore.
8.
ChenT. Y., & TangC. S. (1997). Stress appraisal and social support of Chinese mothers of adult children with mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 101, 473–482.
9.
ChuJ., & SueS (1987). Asian/Pacific American and group practice. Social Work with Groups, 7, 823–830.
10.
DhooperS. S., & MooreS. E. (2001). Social work practice with culturally diverse people. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
FellinP. (2000). Revisiting multiculturalism in social work. Journal of Social Work Education, 36, 261–278.
12.
FlahertyJ. A., & RichmanJ. A. (1986). Effects of childhood relationships on adult's capacity to form social supports. American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 851–855.
13.
FlyntS.W., WoodT. A., & RandallL. S. (1992). Social support of mothers of children with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 30, 233–236.
14.
FraserA. (1988). Traditional beliefs and intellectual disability in Singapore. Intellectual disability: Perspectives and challenges (Proceedings of the 8th Asian Conference on Mental Retardation, November, 1987, Singapore). Singapore: Committee for the promotion of services for the intellectually disabled on behalf of the Asian Federation for the Mentally Retarded).
15.
FriedrichW. N. (1979). Predictors of the coping behaviour of mothers of handicapped children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 1140–1141.
16.
FujiuraG., & BraddockD (1992). Fiscal and demographic trends in mental retardation services: Emergence of the family. In RowitzL. (Ed.), Mental retardation in the year 2000 (pp. 316–338). New York: Springer/Verlag.
17.
GohC. C. (1994). Informal Social networks in the care of young children with disability[Unpublished academic exercise, 1993/1994]. Singapore: National University of Singapore, Department of Social Work and Psychology.
18.
GreenB. L., & RodgersA. (2001). Determinants of social support among low-income mothers: A longitudinal analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 419–441.
19.
GreenJ.W. (1982). Cultural awareness in the human services. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20.
HammudahA. (1991). Islam in focus. Singapore: Muslim Converts Association Singapore.
21.
HoD. Y. F., & ChiuC.Y. (1994). Component ideas of individualism, collectivism, and social organization: An application in the study of Chinese culture. In KimU., TriandisH. C., KagitcibasiC., ChoiS.-C., & YoonG. (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and applications (pp. 137–156). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
HwangK. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 944–974.
23.
Ja'afarI. (n.d.) ISLAM: The basic truths. Singapore: The Muslim Converts’ Association of Singapore, Darul Arqam Singapore.
24.
JAMIYAH, Muslim Missionary Society Singapore. (n.d.). Drug abuse destroys life. Singapore: JAMIYAH.
25.
LamC. (1992). Vocational rehabilitation development in Hong Kong: A crosscultural perspective.Stillwater, OK: National Clearing House of Rehabilitation Training Materials.
26.
LynchE.W., & HansonM. J. (1992). Developing cross cultural competence: A guide for working with young children and their families. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
27.
MarkusH., & KitayamaS (1991). Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–235.
28.
OwR. (1991). Implications of worldviews for social work education. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work, 1, 48–58.
29.
OwR. (1999). Social work in a multicultural context. International Social Work, 42, 7–14.
30.
OwR., & FuJ. L. (1999). Permanency planning: Families of children with intellectual disability. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work, 10, 73–85.
31.
OwR., & KatzD (1999). Family secrets and the disclosure of distressful information in Chinese families. Families in Society, 80, 620–628.
32.
PayneM. (1998). Why social work? Comparative perspective on social issue and response formation. International Social Work, 41, 443–453.
33.
PierceG. R., SarasonB. R., & SarasonI. G. (1990). Integrating social support perspectives: Working models, personal relationships, and situational factors. In DuckSteve (Ed.), Personal relationships and social support (pp. 173-189). Newbury Park, CA. Sage.
34.
PierceG. R., SarasonI. G., & SarasonB.R. (1991). General and relationship- based perceptions of social support: Are two constructs better than one?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 1028–1039.
35.
SarasonI.G., LevineH., BashamR. & SarasonB.R. (1983). Assessing social support: The Social Support Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 127–139.
36.
SarasonB. R., PierceG. R., & SarasonI. G. (1990). Social support: The sense of acceptance and the role of relationships. In SarasonB. R., SarasonI. G., & PierceG. R. (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 97–128). New York: Wiley.
37.
Singapore Census of Population, 2000. (February, 2001), Retrieved 8/16/2001 from the Department of Statistics, Singapore. Website: http://www.singstat.gov.sg.
38.
Siti SohanahK., & OwR. (2001). Worldviews and resilience in children of divorced families. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work: Special Issue on Resilience in Family Crisis, 11, 37–50.
39.
SmullM.W. (1989). Crisis in the community (Report of the Applied Research and Evaluation Unit). Baltimore: University of Maryland, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine.
40.
TataS. P., & LeongF. T. L. (1994). Perceived support, received support and adjustment to stressful life events. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 280–287.
41.
ThamS. C. (1994). Malay family structure: Change and continuity with reference to Singapore (Seminar Paper Series No. 13). Singapore: National University of Singapore, Department of Malay Studies.
42.
TongC. K. (1989). Trends in traditional Chinese religions.Singapore: Ministry of Community Development and Sports.
43.
TsangA. K. T., & BogoM. (1997). Engaging with clients cross-culturally: towards developing research-based practice. Journal of Multicultural Social Work, 6, 73–91.
44.
WeeV. (1977). Religion and ritual among the Chinese in Singapore: An ethnographic study. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Singapore.
