This comparative case study of 3 services for teen mothers demonstrates how social service agencies engage in social problems work not only by drawing on and reproducing public representations of social problems, but also by mediating, interpreting, and even contesting these representations in their routine practices for dealing with clients. The authors' analysis demonstrates how 3 agencies dealing with the same social problem enacted 2 public discourses about teen mothers by addressing their young clients variously as mothers, problem teenagers/problem mothers, and potential social activists. The authors conclude by suggesting that agencies reflect critically on the margin of maneuver they may actually have in defining their clients and addressing the complexity of their clients' concerns.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AddelsonK. P. (1994). Autonomy and life plan: The problem of the “middle class.” In AddelsonK. P. (Ed.), Moral passages: Toward a collectivist moral theory (pp. 104–136. New York: Routledge.
2.
BachrachC. A., StolleyK. S., & LondonK. A. (1992). Relinquishment of premarital births: Evidence from national survey data. Family Planning Perspectives, 24, 27–32.
3.
BlackwellT. (1999, March 6). Learn or lose benefits: Ontario orders teen mothers on welfare back to school. The Gazette, p. A11.
4.
ClewellB. C., Brooks-GunnJ., & BenasichA. A. (1989). Evaluating childrelated outcomes of teenage parenting programs. Family Relations, 38, 201–209.
5.
DaviesL., McKinnonM., RainsP., & MastronardiL. (1999). Rethinking child protection practice: Through the lens of a voluntary agency. Canadian Social Work Review, 16, 103–116.
6.
FolioViews Infobase Manager (Version 3.1) [Computer software]. Folio Corporation, 5072 North 300 West, Provo, UT U.S.A. 84604. Now to be found at http://www.nextpage.com.
7.
FrancisJ., & MarxF (1989). Learning together: A national directory of teen parenting and child care programs. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley College Center for Research on Women.
8.
HaneyL. (1996). Homeboys, babies, men in suits: The state and the reproduction of male dominance. American Sociological Review, 61, 759–778.
9.
HofferthS. L. (1991). Programs for high-risk adolescents: What works? Evaluation and Program Planning, 14, 3–16.
10.
HolmG. (1995). Handled but not heard: The managed lives of teenage mothers in school. Qualitative Studies in Education, 8, 253–264.
11.
HolsteinJ. A., & MillerG. (1993). Social constructionism and social problems work. In HolsteinJ. A. & MillerG. (Eds.), Reconsidering social constructionism: Debates in social problems theory (pp. 151–172). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
12.
HorowitzR. (1995). Teen mothers: Citizens or dependents?Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
KaplanE. B. (1997). Not our kind of girl: Unraveling the myths of black teenage motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
KellyD. M. (1996). Stigma stories: Four discourses about teen mothers, welfare, and poverty. Youth & Society, 27, 421–449.
15.
KennedyM. (1998, Jan. 17). Sounding the alarm: Rise in teen pregnancies worries family-planning advocates. The Gazette, p. A13.
16.
KunzelR. G. (1993) Fallen women, problem girls. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
LevesqueA. (1994). Making and breaking the rules: Women in Quebec, 1919-1939. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: McClelland & Stewart.
18.
LosekeD. (1999). Thinking about social problems: An introduction to constructionist perspectives. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
19.
LosekeD. R. (1992). The battered woman and shelters. Albany: State University of New York Press.
20.
MarxF. (1991). Learning together: A supplement to theNational Directory of Teen Parenting and Child Care Programs. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley College Center for Research on Women.
21.
McKinnonM., DaviesL., & RainsP. (2001). Taking account of men in the lives of teen mothers. Affilia, 16, 80–99.
22.
MortonM. J. (1993). And sin no more: Social policy and unwed mothers in Cleveland, 1855-1990. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
23.
NathansonC. (1991). Dangerous passage: The social control of sexuality in women's adolescence. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
24.
RainsP. M. (1971). Becoming an unwed mother: A sociological account. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
25.
SolingerR. (1992). Wake up little Susie: Single pregnancy before Roe v. Wade. London: Routledge.
26.
SpectorM., & KitsuseJ. I. (1977). Constructing social problems. Menlo Park, CA: Cummings.
27.
SpeirsC. C., & BakerM. (1994). Eligibility to adopt: Models of “suitable” families in legislation and practice. Canadian Social Work Review, 11, 89–102.
28.
VinovskisM. (1988). An “epidemic” of adolescent pregnancy?New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
WadheraS., & MillarW. J. (1997). Teenage pregnancies, 1974 to 1994. Health Reports, 9, 9–17.
30.
WeatherleyR., PerlmanS., LevineM., & KlermanL. (1986). Comprehensive programs for pregnant teenagers and teenage parents: How successful have they been?Family Planning Perspectives, 18, 73–78.
31.
WeatherleyR. A. (1991). Comprehensive services for pregnant and parenting adolescents: Historical and political considerations. Evaluation and Program Planning, 14, 17–25.
32.
WegarK. (1997). Adoption, identity and kinship: The debate over sealed birth records. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
