This study explored the dynamics of collaborative, team-based efforts to provide child welfare services in the context of a public/private partnership model of service delivery. The major areas of exploration included interprofessional team processes, factors that contribute to team effectiveness, perceptions of family participation, and attitudes toward privatization in child welfare. The study used a survey design with a self-administered questionnaire delivered to a purposive sample of 165 child welfare and community professionals who were members of interprofessional child welfare teams in a Midwest, urban county. The findings indicate that respect and unity of purpose predict team satisfaction, and that agency type predicts attitudes toward public/private partnership and some aspects of family participation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramsonJ. S. (1990). Making teams work. Social Work with Groups, 12(4), 45–63.
2.
AbramsonJ. S. (1993). Orienting social work employees in interdisciplinary settings: Shaping professional and organizational perspectives. Social Work, 38(2), 152–157.
3.
AbramsonM. (1984). Collective responsibility in interdisciplinary collaboration. An ethical perspective for social workers. Social Work in Health Care, 10(1), 35–43.
4.
BannonM. J., CarterY. H., & RossL. (1999). Perceived barriers to full participation by general practitioners in the child protection process: Preliminary conclusions from focus group discussions in West Midlands, UK. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 13(3), 239–248.
5.
BellL., & FeldmanL. (1999). A comparison of multi-disciplinary groups in the UK and New Jersey. Child Abuse Review, 8, 314–324.
6.
BowenD. E., LedfordG. E., & NathanB. R. (1991). Hiring for the organization, not the job. Academy of Management Executive, 5, 35–51.
7.
ComptonB. R., & GalawayB. (1999). Social work processes (6th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
8.
CooleyE. (1994). Training an interdisciplinary team in communication and decision-making skills. Small Group Research, 25, 5–25.
9.
CorneyR. (1995). Mental health services. In OwensP., CarrierJ., & HorderJ. (Eds.) Interprofessional issues in community and primary health care.London: MacMillan.
10.
DaneB. O., & SimonB. L. (1991). Resident guests: Social workers in host settings. Social Work, 36(3), 208–213.
11.
ElwynG. J., RapportF., & KinnersleyP. (1998). Primary health care teams re-engineered. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 12(2), 189–198.
12.
FerraraF. F. (1996). Interagency communication measure (ICM): A survey instrument to enhance interagency collaboration. The Clinical Supervisor, 14(1), 175–187.
13.
FranklinC., & StreeterC. L. (1995). School reform: Linking public schools with human services. Social Work, 40(6), 773–782.
14.
GAO/United States General Accounting Office. (1998). Child Welfare: Early experiences implementing a managed care approach (GAO/HEHS 99–108).
15.
HardyM. E., & ConwayM. E. (1988). Role theory: Perspectives for health professionals (2nd ed.). Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.
16.
HarrisJ. (1999). Multi-professional decision-making: The myth of the rational. Educational Psychology in Practice, 14(4), 246–252.
17.
HoM. K. (1977). An analysis of the dynamics of interdisciplinary collaboration. Child Care Quarterly, 6(4), 279–287).
18.
Kansas Action for Children, Inc. (1998). Privatization of child welfare services in Kansas: A child advocacy perspective. (Available from Kansas Action for Children, P. O. Box 463, Topeka, KS 66601)
19.
KinderG. L., & CashmanS. B. (1998). Community-oriented definition of the health workforce and core competencies. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 12(2), 141–155.
20.
KnitzerJ., & YeltonS. (1990). Collaborations between child welfare and mental health: Both systems must exploit the program possibilities. Public Welfare, 48(2), 24–33.
21.
LewandowskiC. A. (1998). Retention outcomes of a public child welfare long-term training program. Professional Development, 1(2), 38–46.
22.
LoweJ. I., & HerranenM. (1978). Conflict in teamwork: Understanding roles and relationships. Social Work in Health Care, 3(3), 323–330.
23.
LoweJ. I., & HerranenM. (1981). Understanding teamwork: Another look at the concepts. Social Work in Health Care, 7(2), 1–11.
24.
MarettK. M., GibbonsW. E., MemmottR. J., BottR. L., & DukeL. (1998). The organizational role of clinical practice models in interdisciplinary collaborative practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 26(2), 217–225.
25.
MellorM. J., & LindemanD. (1998). The role of the social worker in interdisciplinary geriatric teams. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 30(3/4), 3–7.
26.
MillerK., FeinE., BishopG., & MurrayC. (1985). Public-Private collaboration and permanency planning. Families in Society, 66(4), 237–245.
27.
MitchellL., HarveyT., & RollsL. (1998). Interprofessional standards for the care sector: History and challenges. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 12(2), 157–168.
28.
MizrahiT., & AbramsonJ. S. (2000). Collaboration between social workers and physicians: Perspectives on a shared case. Social Work in Health Care, 31(3), 1–24.
29.
MorrowP. C. (1993). The theory and measurement of work commitment.Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
30.
MouzakitisC., & GoldsteinS. (1985). A multidisciplinary approach to treating child neglect. Social Casework, 66(4), 218–224).
31.
NandanM. (1997). Commitment of social services staff to interdisciplinary care plan teams: An exploration. Social Work Research, 21(4), 249–259.
32.
O'BrienK. A. (1998). Interagency collaboration and coordination: Implications for professional development. In JonesS. J., & ZlotnikJ. L. (Eds.), Preparing helping professionals to meet community needs (pp. 111–125). Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
33.
O'LooneyJ. (1993). Beyond privatization and service integration: Organizational models for service delivery. Social Service Review, 67(4), 501–534.
34.
PierceL., & LewandowskiC. A. (2002). Assessing the effect of family-centered out-of-home care on reunification outcomes. Research on Social Work Practice, 12(2), 205–221.
35.
PohlH. (1998). Rural health care: A challenge for academic medical centers. In JonesS. J., & ZlotnikJ. L. (Eds.), Preparing helping professionals to meet community needs (pp. 35–44). Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
36.
QuallsS. H., & CzirrR. (1988). Geriatric health teams: Classifying models of professional and team functioning. The Gerontologist, 28(3), 372–376.
37.
ResnickC., & TigheE. G. (1997). The role of multidisciplinary community clinics in managed care systems. Social Work, 42(1), 91–98.
38.
RobertsK. T., WrightJ. C., ThibeaultJ. M., StewartA. V., & KreppK. R. (1994). Geriatrics partnerships in health care: The life span model. Educational Gerontology, 20, 115–128.
39.
RonnauJ. (1988). Training manual for family advocacy in-home services. The University of Kansas School of Social Welfare.
40.
RycraftJ. (1994). The party isn't over: The agency role in the retention of public child welfare caseworkers. Social Work, 39(1), 75–80.
41.
SaleebeyD. (1997). Introduction: Power in the people. In SaleebeyD. (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice (2nd ed.) (pp. 1–18). White Plains, NY: Longman.
42.
SandsR. G., StaffordJ., & McClellandM. (1990). I beg to differ: Conflict in the interdisciplinary team. Social Work in Health, 14(3), 55–72.
43.
SchofieldR. F., & AmodeoM.1999). Interdisciplinary teams in health care and human services settings: Are they effective?Health and Social Work, 24(3), 210–219.
44.
SchoplerJ. H. (1994). Interorganizational groups in human services: Environmental and interpersonal relationships. Journal of Community Practice, 1(3), 7–27.
45.
SmithA. J., & StowitschekJ. J. (1998). School-based interprofessional case management: A literature-based rationale and a practitioner-molded model. Preventing School Failure, 42(2), 61–65.
46.
TaylorS., & TilleyN. (1990). Inter-agency conflict in child abuse work-reducing tensions between social workers and health visitors. Adoption & Fostering, 14(4), 13–17.
47.
Temkin-GreenerH. (1983). Interprofessional perspectives on teamwork in health care: A case study. Milbank Quarterly: Health and Society, 61, 641–658.
48.
Vinokur-KaplanD. (1995). Treatment teams that work (and those that don't): An application of Hackman's group effectiveness model to interdisciplinary teams in psychiatric hospitals. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 31(3), 303–327.
49.
WaldfogelJ. (1998). Rethinking the paradigm for child protection. The future of children: Protecting Children from Abuse and Neglect, 8(1), 104–119.
