Abstract
Although advocacy is a central aspect of social work practice, there is considerable variation in its purpose, aims, and roles within human services, infusing it with a rich and diverse character. On the basis of a differentiation of who controls the ends or outcomes of advocacy and who controls its means or process, the authors offer a differential model that encompasses four major traditions of advocacy within the profession: protecting the vulnerable, creating supports to enhance functioning, protecting and advancing claims or appeals, and fostering identity and control. The authors then identify four forms of advocacy and examine the conditions under which social workers are likely to employ each of the four variants.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
