Parents who adopt noninfant children often find that these children have academic and behavioral difficulties and may have experienced trauma—challenges that may have implications for school decision making and experiences. This qualitative study examined school selection processes and experiences among lesbian, gay, and heterosexual parents who had adopted children over the age of 24 months (N = 18 families) 5 years earlier. Practical factors (e.g., cost and location) and the unique needs of their children (e.g., diagnoses, trauma history) were often more pressing than race and family structure (i.e., lesbian/gay-parent headed) considerations in selecting schools. Parents encountered complex challenges in establishing and maintaining appropriate school supports and services. Parents and school staff should work collaboratively using trauma-sensitive approaches to help adopted children succeed in school.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakerF. (2013). Making the quiet population of internationally adopted children heard through well-informed teacher preparation. Early Child Development and Care, 183(2), 223–246.
2.
BarrattM. S. (2012). Adopted children and education: The experiences of a specialist CAMHS team. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 141–150.
3.
BennerA. D., & CrosnoeR. (2011). The racial/ethnic composition of elementary schools and young children's academic and socioemotional functioning. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 621–646.
4.
BlitzL. V., AndersonE. M., & SaastamoinenM. (2016). Assessing perceptions of culture and trauma in an elementary school: Informing a model for culturally responsive trauma-informed schools. Urban Review, 48, 520–542.
5.
BogdanR. C., & BiklenS. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (4th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Education Group.
6.
BronfenbrennerU. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742.
7.
BurgessS., GreavesE., VignolesA., & WilsonD. (2011). Parental choice of primary school in England: What types of school do different types of family really have available to them?Policy Studies, 32, 531–547.
8.
CavanaughB. (2016). Trauma-informed classrooms and schools. Beyond Behavior, 25, 41–46.
9.
CookK., BennettK., LaneJ., & MatarasT. (2013). Beyond the brick walls: Homeschooling students with special needs. Physical Disabilities: Education and Related Services, 32(2), 90–104.
10.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139–167.
11.
DannR. (2011). Look out! ‘Looked after’! Look here! Supporting ‘looked after’ and adopted children in the primary classroom, Education, 39, 455–465.
12.
DaviesS., & AuriniJ. (2011). Determinants of school choice in Canada: Who chooses what and why?Canadian Public Policy, 37, 459–477.
13.
EanesA. Y., & FletcherA. C. (2006). Factors associated with perceived parenting competence among special needs adoptive mothers. Families in Society, 87, 249–258.
14.
FarrR., OakleyM., & OllenE. (2016). School experiences of young children and their lesbian and gay adoptive parents. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 3(4), 442–447.
15.
FinnJ., CaldwellK., & RaubT. (2006). Why parents choose charter schools for their children with disabilities. Journal of Educational Research & Policy Studies, 6, 91–110.
16.
GartrellN., BanksA., HamiltonJ., ReedN., BishopH., & RodasC. (1999). The National Lesbian Family Study: 2. Interviews with mothers of toddlers. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 69, 362–369.
17.
GatesG., BadgettL. M. V., MacomberJ. E., & ChambersK. (2007). Adoption and foster care by gay and lesbian parents in the United States.Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
18.
GibbsD., BarthR. P., & HoutsR. (2005). Family characteristics and dynamics among families receiving postadoption services. Families in Society, 86, 520–532.
19.
Glenn-ApplegateK., JusticeL., & KaderavekJ. (2016). How do caregivers select preschools? A study of children with and without disabilities. Child & Youth Care Forum, 45, 123–153.
20.
Glenn-ApplegateK., PentimontiJ., & JusticeL. (2011). Parents' selection factors when choosing preschool programs for their children with disabilities. Child & Youth Care Forum, 40(3), 211–231.
21.
GoldbergA. E., BlackK., SweeneyK., & MoyerA. (2017). Lesbian, gay, and heterosexual adoptive parents' perceptions of inclusivity and receptiveness in early childhood education settings. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 31, 141–159.
GoldbergA. E., & SmithJ. Z. (2013). Predictors of psychological adjustment among early-placed adopted children with lesbian, gay, and heterosexual parents. Journal of Family Psychology, 27, 431–442.
24.
GoldbergA. E., & SmithJ. Z. (2014a). Predictors of school engagement among lesbian, gay, and heterosexual adoptive parents of kindergarteners. Journal of School Psychology, 52, 463–478.
25.
GoldbergA. E., & SmithJ. Z. (2014b). Preschool selection considerations and experiences of school mistreatment among lesbian, gay, and heterosexual adoptive parents. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29, 64–75.
26.
GrolnickW., & SlowiaczekM. (1994). Parents' involvement in children's schooling: A multi-dimensional conceptualization and motivational model. Child Development, 65, 237–252.
27.
GunnarM., van DulmenM. H. M., & The International Adoption Project Team. (2007). Behavior problems in postinstitutionalized internationally adopted children. Development and Psychopathology, 19(1), 129–148.
28.
HeathA. F., ColtonM. J., & AldgateJ. (1994). Failure to escape: A longitudinal study of foster children's educational attainment. The British Journal of Social Work, 24, 241–260.
29.
HillK., & KoesterS. (2015). An examination of the impact of permanency on young adults' special education experiences. National Association of Social Workers, 37, 155–163.
30.
HornbyG., & LafaeleR. (2011). Barriers to parental involvement in education: An explanatory model. Educational Review, 63, 37–52.
31.
HowardJ., Livingston SmithS., & RyanS. (2004). A comparative study of child welfare adoptions with other types of adopted children and birth children. Adoption Quarterly, 7, 1–30.
32.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act, title I, part B, U.S.C. § 614 (2004).
33.
NelsonC., ZeanahC., FoxN., MarshallP., SmykeA., & GuthrieD. (2007). Cognitive recovery in socially deprived young children: The Bucharest Early Intervention Project. Science, 318, 1937–1940.
34.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluationmethods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
35.
Rehabilitation Act, 34 C.F.R. 104 § 504 (1973).
36.
RijkC. H. A., HoksbergenR. A. C., & ter LaakJ. (2008). Education after early-life deprivation: Teachers' experiences with a clinical group of deprived Romanian adopted children. Adoption Quarterly, 11, 255–277.
37.
SamuelsG. M. (2009). “Being raised by White people”: Navigating racial difference among adopted multiracial adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 80–94.
38.
SmrekarC. E., & GoldringE. B. (1999). School choice in urban America: Magnet schools and the pursuit of equity.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
39.
SmykeA., ZeanahC., FoxN., NelsonC., & GuthrieD. (2010). Placement in foster care enhances quality of attachment among young institutionalized children. Child Development, 81, 212–223.
40.
TanT. (2009). School-age adopted Chinese girls' behavioral adjustment, academic performance, and social skills: Longitudinal results. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 79, 244–251.
41.
TaylorS. (2005). Special education and private schools: Principals' points of view. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 281–296.
42.
TaymansJ. M., MarottaS. A., LynchS. J., RileyD. B., OritzD. M., LaFauci SchuutJ. M., … EmbichJ. L. (2008). Adoption as a diversity issue in professional preparation: Perceptions of preservice education professionals. Adoption Quarterly, 11(1), 24–44.
43.
van IJzendoornM., JufferF., & PoelhuisC. (2005). Adoption and cognitive development: A meta-analytic comparison of adopted and nonadopted children's IQ and school performance. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 301–316.
44.
WindsorJ., GlazeL. E., KogaS. F., & Bucharest Early Intervention Project Core Group. (2007). Language acquisition with limited input: Romanian institution and foster care. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 1365–1381.
45.
ZeanahC. H., GunnarM. R., McCallR. B., KreppnerJ. M., & FoxN. A. (2011). Children without permanent parents: Research, practice, and policy: VI. Sensitive periods [Monograph]. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 76(4), 147–162. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2011.00631.x
