This study examined the impact of child protective services (CPS) in-home services on child maltreatment recurrence, mediated by perceived match between services and needs and by stress. The process model was tested using structural equation modeling, with 373 caregivers who were reported to Illinois CPS. The findings indicate that among CPS in-home service components (concrete services, clinical services, and emotional support), only emotional support had indirect effects on child maltreatment recurrence; emotional support from a caseworker increased the perceived match between services and needs; the perceived match decreased perceived stress; and decreased stress reduced child maltreatment recurrence. The importance of family-centered practice in child welfare and the need for trainings are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BauerD. J., & CurranP. J. (2011). Introduction to structural equation modeling: Course notesChapel Hill, NC: Curran-Bauer Analytics.
2.
BagdasaryanS. (2005). Evaluating family preservation services: Reframing the question of effectiveness. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 615–635.
3.
ChoiS., & RyanJ. P. (2007). Co-occurring problems for substance abusing mothers in child welfare: Matching services to improve family reunification, Children and Youth Services Review, 23, 1395–1410.
4.
CohenS., KamarckT., & MemelsteinR. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385–396.
5.
ColemanH., & CollinsD. (1997). The voices of parents: A qualitative study of a family preservation program. Child and Youth Care Forum, 26, 261–274.
6.
DePanfilisD., & ZuravinS. J. (2002). The effect of services on the recurrence of child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 26, 187–205.
7.
EpleyP., SummersJ. A., & TurnbullA. (2010). Characteristics and trends in family-centered conceptualizations. Journal of Family Social Work, 13, 269–285.
8.
FlukeJ. D., ShustermanG. R., HollinsheadD. M., & YuanY. T. (2008). Longitudinal analysis of repeated child abuse reporting and victimization: Multistate analysis of associated factors. Child Maltreatment, 13, 76–88.
9.
FullerT. L., PaceleyM. S., & SchreiberJ. C. (2015). Differential response family assessments: Listening to what parents say about service helpfulness. Child Abuse & Neglect, 39, 7–17.
10.
FullerT., & NietoM. (2014). Child welfare services and risk of child maltreatment rereports: Do services ameliorate initial risk?Children and Youth Services Review, 47, 46–54.
11.
FullerT., NietoM., & ZhangS. (2013). Differential response in Illinois: Final evaluation report.Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, School of Social Work, Children and Family Research Center.
12.
GaudinJ. M.Jr., PolanskyN. A., KilpatrickA. C., & ShiltonP. (1993). Loneliness, depression, stress, and social supports in neglectful families. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 63, 597–605.
13.
GladstoneJ., DumbrillG., LeslieB., KosterA., YoungM., & IsmailaA. (2012). Looking at engagement and outcome from the perspectives of child protection workers and parents. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 112–118.
14.
HorvathA. O., & SymondsB. D. (1991). Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 139–149.
15.
LittellJ. H. (1997). Effects of the duration, intensity, and breadth of family preservation services: A new analysis of data from the Illinois Family First experiment. Children and Youth Services Review, 19, 17–39.
16.
LittellJ. H., & SchuermanJ. R. (2002). What works best for whom? A closer look at intensive family preservation services. Children and Youth Services Review, 24, 673–699.
17.
MarshJ. C., AngellB., AndrewsC. M., & CurryA. (2012). Client-provider relationship and treatment outcome: A systematic review of substance abuse, child welfare, and mental health service research. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 3, 233–267.
18.
MarshJ. C., CaoD., GuerreoE., & ShinH. (2009). Need-service matching in substance abuse treatment: Racial/ethnic differences. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32, 43–51.
19.
McCubbinH. I., & PattersonJ. M. (1983). The family stress process: The Double ABCX model of adjustment and adaptation. Marriage and Family Review, 6, 7–37.
RyanJ. P., & SchuermanJ. R. (2004). Matching family problems with specific family preservation services: A study of service effectiveness. Children and Youth Services Review, 26, 347.
23.
SlackK. S., BergerL. M., DuMontK., YangM., KimB., Ehrhard-DietzelS., & HollJ. L. (2011). Risk and protective factors for child neglect during early childhood: A cross-study comparison. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 1354–1363.
24.
SmithB. D., & MarshJ. C. (2002). Client-service matching in substance abuse treatment for women with children. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22, 161–168.
25.
StithS. M., LiuT., DaviesL. C., BoykinE. L., AlderM. C., HarrisJ. M., … DeesJ. E. M. E. G. (2009). Risk factors in child maltreatment: A meta-analytic review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 13–29.
26.
TimmerS. G., BorregoJ., & UrquizaA. J. (2002). Antecedents of coercive interactions in physically abusive mother-child dyads. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 836–853.
27.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2013). Child maltreatment 2012.Washington, DC: Author.
