Using a mixed method of inquiry of 49 women at a halfway house in New Jersey, this exploratory study evaluated factors of risk and resilience that impact incarcerated mothers. A quantitative analysis of the sample provided insights into this halfway house population, and a content analysis of case files revealed themes related to intergenerational factors and mother–child relationships. Practice, policy, and research implications of this study are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArdittiJ., & FewA (2008). Maternal distress and women's reentry into family and community life.Family Process, 47(3), 303–321.
2.
BenardB. (1993). Fostering resiliency in kids. Educational Leadership, 51(3), 44–48.
3.
BrownM., & BloomB (2009). Reentry and renegotiating motherhood: Maternal identity and success on parole. Crime & Delinquency, 55(2), 313–336. doi:10.1177/0011128708330627
4.
GlazeL. E. (2011). Correctional populations in the United States 2010. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?iid=2237&ty=pbdetail.
5.
BurnettR., & MarunaS (2004). So “prison works,” does it? The criminal careers of 130 men released from prison under Home Secretary Michael Howard.Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 390-404. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2311.2004.00337.x
6.
ChaneyC. (2011). “So my family can survive”: Prisoner re-entry and the risk and resilience of Black families. Journal of African American Studies, 15, 95-114. doi:10.1007/s12111-009-9111-8
7.
CobbinaJ. A. (2010). Reintegration success and failure: Factors impacting reintegration among incarcerated and formerly incarcerated women.Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 49, 210-232. doi:10.1080/10509671003666602
8.
DallaireD. H. (2007). Incarcerated mothers and fathers: A comparison of risks for children and families.Family Relations, 56, 440-453. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00472.x
9.
FletcherD., & SarkarM (2013). Psychological resilience: A review and critique of definitions, concepts and theory. European Psychologist, 18(1), 12–23. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000124
10.
GreeneS., HaneyC., & HurtadoA. (2000). Cycles of pain: Risk factors in the lives of incarcerated mothers and their children.Prison Journal, 80, 3-23. doi:10.1177/0032885500080001001
11.
HairstonC. F. (2009). Kinship care when parents are incarcerated: What we know, what we can do.Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation.
12.
HerrschaftB. A., VeyseyB. M., Tubman-CarboneH. R., & ChristianJ. (2009). Gender differences in the transformation narrative: Implications for revised reentry strategies for female offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48(6), 463–482. doi:10.1080/10509670903081250
13.
JanesickV. J. (1994). The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphors, methodology, and meaning. In DenzinN. K. & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 209–219). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
14.
JbaraA. E. (2012). The price they pay: Protecting the mother-child relationship through the use of prison nurseries and residential parenting programs. Indiana Law Journal, 87, 1825–1845.
15.
LoperA. B., & TuerkE. H. (2011). Improving the emotional adjustment and communication patterns of incarcerated mothers: Effectiveness of a prison parenting intervention.Journal of Child & Family Studies, 20, 89-111. doi:1007/s10826-010-9381-8
16.
MarkowitzF. E. (2001). Attitudes and family violence: Linking intergenerational and cultural theories.Journal of Family Violence, 16(2), 205–218.
17.
MarunaS. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18.
McGrathE. (2012). Reentry courts: Providing a second chance for incarcerated mothers and their children.Family Court Review, 5(1), 113–127.
19.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
20.
MumolaC. J. (2000). Incarcerated parents and their children [Bureau of Justice Statistics: Special report]. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=981.
21.
MurrayJ., & FarringtonD. P. (2005). Parental imprisonment: Effects on boys’ antisocial behaviour and delinquency through the life-course. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 1269-1278. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01433.x
22.
PadgettD. K. (1998). Qualitative methods in social work research: Challenges and rewards.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
23.
SchramP. J., Koons-WittB. A., WilliamsF. P., & McShaneM. D. (2006). Supervision strategies and approaches for female parolees: Examining the link between unmet needs and parolee outcome. Crime & Delinquency, 52(3), 450–471. doi:10.1177/0011128705281845
24.
Smith-OsborneA., & BoltonK. W. (2013). Assessing resilience: A review of measures across the life course.Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 10, 111-126. doi:10.1080.15433714.2011.597305
25.
StringerE. C., & BarnesS. L. (2012). Mothering while imprisoned: The effects of family and child dynamics on mothering attitudes.Family Relations, 61, 313-326. doi:10.1111/j.1741- 3729.2011.000696.x
26.
WilsonK., GonzalezP., RomeroT., HenryK., & CerbanaC. (2010). The effectiveness of parent education for incarcerated parents: An evaluation of Parenting From Prison.Journal of Correctional Education, 61(2), 114–132.