This paper describes sociodemographics, program involvement, and outcomes for 115 families involved in a rural HFA program. HFA-involved families fared well in concrete areas, yet demonstrated fewer positive changes in abstract goals. Subgroup analyses revealed relationships between mothers' sociodemographic characturistics and outcomes. HFA programs must allow for variability in implementation based on context. The effectiveness of persistent outreach in a geographically-dispersed area with families who do not engage with home visitors merits reexamination. While the riskiest families should always be given the opportunity to participate, we suggest that rural implementation may be most effective when utilized as part of a triage case management model which better integrates child welfare, mental and physical health care systems.
CaldwellB. M., & BradleyR. H. (1984). Home observation for measurement of the environment. Little Rock: University of Arkansas Center for Child Development and Education.
3.
ConstantinoJ. N., HashemiN., SolisE., AlonT., HaleyS., McClureS., (2001). Supplementation of urban home visitation with a series of group meetings for parents and infants: Results of a “real-world” randomized, controlled trial. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25, 1571–1581.
4.
CordesS. M. (1989). The changing rural environment and the relationship between health services and rural development. Health Services Research, 23, 757–784.
5.
DaroD. A., & HardingK. A. (1999). Healthy Families America: Using research to enhance practice. The Future of Children, 9(1), 152–176.
6.
GombyD. S. (1999). Understanding evaluations of home visiting programs. The Future of Children, 9(1), 27–43.
7.
GombyD. S., CulrossP. L., & BehrmanR. E. (1999). Home visiting: Recent program evaluations—Analysis and recommendations. The Future of Children, 9(1), 4–26.
8.
GrayJ., SpurwayP., & McClatcheyM. (2001). Lay therapy intervention with families at risk for parenting difficulties: The Kempe Community Caring Program. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25, 641–655.
9.
GutermanN. B. (1997). Early prevention of physical child abuse and neglect: Existing evidence and future directions. Child Maltreatment, 2, 12–34.
10.
GutermanN. B. (1999). Enrollment strategies in early home visitation to prevent physical child abuse and neglect and the “universal versus targeted” debate: A meta-analysis of population-based and screeningbased programs. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23, 863–890.
11.
HeymanS. R., & VandenBosG. R. (1989). Developing local resources to enrich the practice of rural community psychology. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 40, 21–23.
12.
KinardE. M. (2002). Services for maltreated children: Variations by maltreatment characteristics. Child Welfare, 81, 617–645.
13.
KorfmacherJ. (2000). The Kempe Family Stress Inventory: A review. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 129–140.
14.
KorfmacherJ., KitzmanH., & OldsD. (1998). Intervention processes as predictors of outcomes in a preventive home-visitation program. Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 49–64.
MacLeodJ., & NelsonG (2000). Programs for the promotion of family wellness and the prevention of child maltreatment: A meta-analytic review. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 1127–1149.
17.
MayerJ. P., HousemannR. M., & PiepenbrokB. (1999). Evaluation of a theory-based intervention to improve immunization in a rural HeadStart program. Journal of Community Health, 24, 13–27.
18.
MerwinE. I., GoldsmithH. F., & ManderscheidR.W. (1995). Human resource issues in rural mental health services. Community Mental Health Journal, 31, 525–537.
19.
OldsD. L., RobinsonJ., O'BrienR., LuckeyD.W., PettittL. M., HendersonC. R.Jr., (2002). Home visiting by paraprofessionals and by nurses: A randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics, 110, 486–496.
20.
SquiresJ., PotterL., & BrickerD. (1995). The ASQ users guide.Baltimore: Brooks.
21.
WhippleE. E. (1999). Reaching families with preschoolers at risk of physical child abuse: What works?Families in Society, 80, 148–160.
22.
WhippleE. E., & Webster-StrattonC.W. (1991). The role of parental stress in physically abusive families. Child Abuse & Neglect, 15, 279–291.
