The concept of social justice is deeply rooted in social work. The theoretical framework most often embraced by the profession is John Rawls' A Theory of Justice. However, like most frameworks it has limitations. This paper examines Rawls' social justice framework as interpreted by social work and offers an alternative, called the “capabilities” perspective, that emerged nearly a decade after Rawls' 1971 seminal work. Developed by welfare economist Amartya Sen and further articulated by political philosopher Martha Nussbaum, this perspective builds on Rawls' distributive justice approach and adds the dimensions of human dignity, self-determination, and well-being to its justice framework.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottG. (1924). Presidential address: Public protection of children. Proceedings of the National Conference of Social Work, 51, 3–14.
2.
AbramovitzM. (1993). Should all social work students be educated for social change?Journal of Social Work Education, 29(1), 6–11.
3.
AbramovitzM. (1998). Social work and social reform: An arena of struggle. Social Work, 43(6), 512–526.
4.
BrunoF. J. (1933). Social work objectives in the new era. Proceedings of the National Conference of Social Work, 60, 3–19.
5.
CoyleG. L. (1940). Presidential address: Social work at the turn of the decade. Proceedings of the National Conference of Social Work, 67, 3–26.
6.
CrockerD. A. (1997). Functioning and capability: The foundations of Sen's and Nussbaum's Development ethic, Parts 1 and 2. In AckermanF., KironD., GoodwinN. R., HarrisJ. M., & GallagherK. (Eds.), Human well-being and economic goals (pp. 301–308). Washington, DC: Island Press.
7.
Figueira-McDonoughJ. (1993). Policy practice: The neglected side of social work intervention. Social Work, 38(2), 179–187.
8.
GibelmanM. (1999). The search for identity: Defining social work—past, present, future. Social Work, 44(4), 298–310.
9.
GillD. G., (1979). Beyond the jungle: Essays on human possibilities, social alternatives, and radical practice.Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing.
10.
GoldsteinE. G. (1996). What is clinical social work? Looking back to move forward. Clinical Social Work Journal, 24(1), 89–104.
11.
GoodwinN. R., (1997). Interdisciplinary perspectives on well-being. In AckermanF., KironD., GoodwinN. R., HarrisJ. M., & GallagherK. (Eds.), Human well-being and economic goals (pp. 1–14). Washington, DC: Island Press.
12.
GordonW. E., (1962). A critique of a working definition. Social Work, 7(4), 3–13.
13.
GordonW. E., (1965). Knowledge and value: Their distinction and relationship in clarifying social work. Social Work, 10(3), 32–40.
14.
GordonW. E., (1983). Social work revolution or evolution?Social Work, 28, 181–185.
15.
HaynesK. S. (1998). The one hundred-year debate: Social reform versus individual treatment. Social Work, 43(6), 501–509.
16.
KironD., (1997). Economics and the good, III: Society. In AckermanF., KironD., GoodwinN. R., HarrisJ. M., & GallagherK. (Eds.), Human well-being and economic goals (pp. 239–248). Washington, DC: Island Press.
17.
KironD. (1997). Amartya Sen's contributions to understanding personal welfare. In AckermanF., KironD., GoodwinN. R., HarrisJ. M., & GallagherK. (Eds.), Human well-being and economic goals (pp. 197–202). Washington, DC: Island Press.
18.
KukathasC., & PettitP. (1990). Rawls a theory of justice and its critics.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19.
LappJ. A., (1927). Presidential address: Justice first. Proceedings of the National Conference of Social Work, 54, 3–13.
20.
National Association of Social Workers. (1999). Code of ethics.Washington, DC: Author.
21.
NussbaumM. C. (1999). Women and equality: The capabilities approach. International Labor Review, 138(3), 227–251.
22.
NussbaumM. C. (2000). Aristotle, politics, and human capabilities: A response to Antony, Arneson, Charlesworth, and Mulgan. Ethics, 111(1), 102–136.
23.
NussbaumM. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach.Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
24.
RawlsJ. (1971). A theory of justice.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
ReamerF. G., (1998). The evolution of social work ethics. Social Work, 43(6), 488–499.
26.
ReeserL. C., & LeighningerL. (1990). Back to our roots: Toward a specialization in social justice. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 17(2), 69–87.
27.
RichmondM. (1911). Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Corrections, 38, 292–295.
28.
SaleebeyD. (1990). Philosophical disputes in social work: Social justice denied. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 17, 29–40.
29.
SenA. (1985). Commodities and capabilities.Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
30.
SenA. (1985). The standard of living: The Tanner lectures.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
SenA. (1992). Inequality reexamined.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
32.
SpechtH., & CourtneyM. E. (1995). Unfaithful angels: How social work abandoned its mission.New York: The Free Press.
33.
SugdenR. (1979). Welfare, resources, and capabilities: A review of inequality reexamined by Amartya Sen. In AckermanF., KironD., GoodwinN. R., HarrisJ. M., & GallagherK. (Eds.), Human well-being and economic goals (pp. 249–251). Washington, DC: Island Press.
34.
SwensonC. R. (1998). Clinical social work's contribution to a social justice perspective. Social Work, 43(6), 527–537.
35.
TrattnerW. I. (1989). From poor law to welfare state: A history of social welfare in America (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
36.
TuckerF. (1913). Presidential address: Social justice. Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Corrections, 40, 1–13.
37.
Van SoestD. (1994). Strange bedfellows: A call for reordering national priorities from three social justice perspectives. Social Work, 39(6), 710–717.
38.
WakefieldJ. C. (1988). Psychotherapy, distributive justice, and social work: Part 1: Distributive justice as a conceptual framework for social work. Social Service Review, 62, 187–210.
39.
WakefieldJ. C. (1988). Psychotherapy, distributive justice, and social work: Part 2: Psychotherapy and the pursuit of justice. Social Service Review, 62, 353–382.
40.
WaltzT., & GrozeV. (1991). The mission of social work revisited: An agenda for the 1990s. Social Work, 36(6), 500–504.
41.
WellerC. F. (1902). Relief and prevention. Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Corrections, 29, 265–276.
42.
WitkinS. L., (1998). Editorial: Is social work an adjective?Social Work, 43(6), 483–486.
43.
WiseS. S. (1909). The conference sermon: Charity versus justice. Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Corrections, 36, 20–29.
