Pressured to be a “proper profession,” social work often failed to attend to its ambiguous and improvisational nature. In this article, the author recasts social work in a performance framework and repositions the profession between traditional categories such as art or science. In an indeterminate “third space of the borderlands” the critical yet unrecognized improvisational arenas of social life and social work become visible. Exploring improvisation, the author discusses theater literature and provides insights as to how social work is an improvisational profession that always performs and re-forms various identities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AddamsJ. (1914). Twenty years at Hull-House.New York: Macmillan
2.
BartlettH. M. (1970). The common base of social work practice.New York: NASW Press.
3.
BoehmW. (1959). Social work curriculum study: Vol. 1. Objectives of the social work curriculum for the future.New York: Council on Social Work Education.
4.
ButlerJ. (1990). Gender trouble—Feminism and subversion of identity.New York: Routledge.
DeeganM. J. (1988). Jane Addams and the men of the Chicago School, 1892–1918.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
7.
EatonJ. W. (1958). Science, “art,” and uncertainty in social work. Social Work, 3, 3–10.
8.
FlexnerA. (2000). Is social work a profession? In LeighningerL., Creating a new profession: The beginnings of social work education in the United States (pp. 39–46). Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education. (Original work published 1915)
9.
GermainC. (1970). Casework and science: A historical encounter. In RobertsR. W., & NeeR. H. (Eds.), Theories of social casework (pp. 3–32). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
GibelmanM. (1999). The search for identity: Defining social work—Past, present, future. Social Work, 44, 298–310.
11.
GoldsteinH. (1990). The knowledge base of social work practice: Theory, wisdom, analogue, or art?Families in Society, 71, 32–43.
12.
GoldsteinH. (1992). If social work hasn't made progress as science, maybe it is an art?Families in Society, 73, 48–55.
13.
GoldsteinH. (1997). The ironies and art of psychotherapy: A call for humanities; a narrative essay. Reflections, 3, 21–34.
14.
GoldsteinH. (1998). Education for ethical dilemmas in social work practice. Families in Society, 79, 241–253.
15.
GoldsteinH. (1999). Inspiration. Families in Society, 80, 547–550.
16.
GoldsteinH. (2001). Experiential learning: A foundation for social work education and practice.Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
17.
GutiérrezL. M., ParsonsR. J., & CoxE. O. (Eds.). (1998). Empowerment in social work practice: A sourcebook.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
18.
HaynesD. T., & WhiteB. W. (1999). Will the “real” social work please stand up? A call to stand for professional unity. Social Work, 44, 385–391.
JacksonS. (2000). Lines of activity: Performance, historiography, and domesticity in Hull-House.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
21.
JohnstoneK. (1981). Impro: Improvisation and the theatre.New York: Routledge.
22.
JohnstoneK. (1999). Impro for storytellers.New York: Routledge.
23.
KunzelR. G. (1993). Fallen women, problem girls: Unmarried mothers and the professionalization of social work, 1890–1945.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24.
LeighningerR. D., LeighningerL., & PankinR. (1974). Sociology and social work: Science and art?Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 1, 81–89.
25.
MacIverR. (1931). The contribution of sociology to social work.New York: Columbia University Press.
26.
MinnichE. (1990). Transforming knowledge.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
27.
NachmanovitchS. (1990). Free play – Improvisation in life and art.New York: Tarcher/Putnam.
28.
ReynoldsB. C. (1985). Learning and teaching in the practice of social work.Silver Spring, MD: NASW Press. (Original work published 1942)
29.
RichmondM. E. (1917). Social diagnosis.New York: Sage.
30.
RobbinsS. P. (1999). Theory, knowledge, and social work practice: Ongoing debates and fresh perspectives. Families in Society, 80, 325–326.
31.
RosaldoR. (1993). Culture and truth.Boston: Beacon.
32.
SaleebeyD. (1989). The estrangement of knowing and doing: Professions in crisis. Social Casework, 70, 556–563.
33.
SaleebeyD. (Ed.). (1992). The strengths perspective in social work practice.New York: Longman.
34.
SchönD. (1983). The reflective practitioner.New York: Basic Books.
35.
SchönD. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner.San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
36.
SchönD. (1995). Knowing-in-Action: The new scholarship requires a new epistemology, Change, 27(6), 27–34.
37.
SpolinV. (1999). Improvisation for the theater (3rd ed.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
38.
TiceK. W. (1998). Tales of wayward girls and immoral women: Case records and the professionalization of social work.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
39.
WhiteM., & EpstonD. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends.New York: Norton.
40.
WitkinS. L. (1999). Identities and contexts. Social Work, 44, 293–297.
