A qualitative study undertaken in Mumbai, India, explored the family experience of HIV/AIDS. Seven nuclear households (4 with concordant couples in which both spouses in the marriage were seropositive, and 3 with discordant couples in which only one spouse was seropositive) included in the study reported devastating impacts in various spheres of family life, following the onset and the progress of HIV-related illness, and the knowledge of the seropositive diagnosis. Complex changes were observed in family composition, spousal relationships, family formation, family roles and responsibilities, family economy, quality of life, and family aspirations. The findings have direct implications for policy formulation, program planning, and service delivery in the field of HIV/AIDS.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AsthanaS. (1996). AIDS-related policies, legislation and program implementation in India. Health Policy and Planning, 11, 184–197.
2.
BasuA. M., GuptaD. B., & KrishnaG. (1997). The household impact of adult morbidity and mortality: Some implications of the potential epidemic of AIDS in India. In BloomD., & GodwinP. (Eds.), The economics of HIV and AIDS (pp. 102–154). New Delhi: Oxford.
3.
BharatS. (1996). Facing the challenge: Household and community responses to HIV/AIDS in Mumbai, India.Unpublished project report. Mumbai: Tata Institute of Social Sciences.
4.
BharatS. (1999). HIV/AIDS related discrimination, stigmatization and denial in India (A study in Mumbai and Bangalore). Unpublished project report. Mumbai: Tata Institute of Social Sciences.
5.
BharatS., & AggletonP. (1999). Facing the challenge: Household responses to HIV/AIDS in Mumbai, India. AIDS Care, 11, 31–44.
6.
BharatS., Singhanetra-RenardA., & AggletonP. (1998). Household and community responses to HIV/AIDS in Asia: The case of Thailand and India. AIDS, 12(Suppl B), S117–S122.
7.
BloomD. E., & MahalA. S. (1997). AIDS, flu and black death: Impacts on economic growth and well being. In BloomD., & GodwinP. (Eds.), The economics of HIV and AIDS (pp. 22–52). New Delhi: Oxford.
8.
BorR., ElfordJ., HartG., & SherrL. (1993). The family and HIV disease. AIDS Care, 5, 3–4.
9.
BrymanA. (1988). Quality and quantity in social research.London: Unwin Hyman.
Census of India. (1991). Series 14. Maharashtra—Provision Population Totals (Paper 1 of 1991). New Delhi: Government of India.
12.
D'CruzP. (1998). The family context of a terminal illness: The case of HIV/AIDS.Unpublished dissertation. Mumbai: Tata Institute of Social Sciences.
13.
D'CruzP., & BharatS. (2001). Towards methodological rigor in the study of the family: Problem and prospects. Psychology and Developing Societies, 13, 71–91.
14.
DuggalR. (1998). Health care as human right. Radical Journal of Health, 13, 141–142.
15.
Global Program on AIDS. (1995). 1992–93 Progress report: Global program on AIDS.Geneva: World Health Organization.
16.
GodwinP. (1997). Socio-economic implications of the epidemic.New Delhi: United Nations Development Program.
17.
GodwinP. (1998). The looming epidemic.New Delhi: Mosaic.
18.
GrunseitA., & KippaxS. (1992). Response to HIV/AIDS at the individual, household, community and society levels.Australia: National Center for HIV Social Research.
19.
GubaE. (1978). Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation.Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation.
20.
National AIDS Control Organization. (2000). HIV/AIDS Indian Scenario: Estimation of HIV infection among adult population.New Delhi: Author. Retrieved September 28, 2001, from http://naco.nic.in/vsnaco/indianscene/update.htm
21.
HudelsonP. M. (1994). Qualitative research for health programs.Geneva: World Health Organization.
22.
JoshiP. L., & RaoJ. V. R. P. (1999). Changing epidemiology of HIV/AIDS in India. AIDS Research and Review, 2, 7–9.
23.
KingM. B. (1993). AIDS, HIV and mental health.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
ManeP., & MaitraS. A. (1992). AIDS prevention: The sociocultural context in India.Mumbai: Tata Institute of Social Sciences.
McCannK., & WadsworthE. (1992). The role of informal careers in supporting gay men who have HIV-related illness: What do they do and what are their needs?AIDS Care, 4, 25–34.
27.
MilesM. S., & HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
MorseJ. M. (1991). Strategies for sampling. In MorseJ. M. (Ed.), Qualitative nursing research (pp. 127–145). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
National AIDS Control Organization. (1998). Country scenario 1997–98.New Delhi: Author.
30.
NagM. (1996). Sexual behavior and AIDS in India.New Delhi: Vikas.
31.
NarainJ. P., JhaA., LalS., & SalunkeS. (1994). Risk factors for HIV transmission in India. AIDS, 8(Suppl 2), S77–S82.
32.
PadgettD. K. (1998). Qualitative methods in social work research.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
PoindexterC. C., & LinskN. L. (1998). Sources of support in a sample of HIV-affected older minority caregivers. Families in Society, 79, 491–503.
35.
PoindexterC. C., & LinskN. L. (1999). HIV-related stigma in a sample of HIV-affected older female African-American caregivers. Social Work, 44, 46–61.
36.
RamasubbanR. (1998). HIV/AIDS in India: Gulf between rhetoric and reality. Economic and Political Weekly, 33, 2865–2872.
37.
Structural adjustment: A major cause of poverty. (1998–2001). Created July 20, 1998 and periodically updated. Retrieved September 28, 2001, from http://www.globalissues.com/TradeRelated/SAP.asp
38.
TaylorS. J., & BogdanR. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods.New York: John Wiley.
39.
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. (1999). A review of household and community responses to the HIV/AIDS epidemic in rural areas of sub-Saharan Africa.Geneva: Author.
WarwickI., BharatS., CastroR., GarciaR., LeshabariM. T., Singhanetra-RenardA., & AggletonP. (1998). Household and community responses to HIV and AIDS in developing countries. Critical Public Health, 8, 311–328.
