AugustR., & ForemanB. (1989). A comparison of sexually abused and nonsexually abused children's behavioral responses to anatomically correct dolls. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 20(1), 39–47.
2.
BaysJ. (1990). Are the genitalia of anatomical dolls distorted?Child Abuse and Neglect, 14, 171–175.
3.
BoatB., & EversonM. (1996). Concerning practices of interviewers when using anatomical dolls in Child Protective Services Investigations. Child Maltreatment, 1(2), 96–104.
4.
BruckM., CeciS., FrancoeurE., & RenickA. (1995). Anatomically detailed dolls do not facilitate preschoolers' reports of a pediatric examination involving genital touching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1(2), 95–109.
5.
CeciS., & BruckM. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom.New York: American Psychological Association.
6.
CohnD. (1991). Anatomical doll play of preschoolers referred for sexual abuse and those not referred. Child Abuse and Neglect, 15(4), 455–466.
7.
DallamS. (1998). Dr. Richard Gardner: A Review of his theories and opinions on atypical sexuality, pedophilia, and treatment issues. Treating Abuse Today, 8(1), 15–19, 22–24.
8.
EversonM., & BoatB. (1994). Putting the anatomical doll controversy in perspective: An examination of the major doll uses and related criticisms. Child Abuse and Neglect, 18(2), 113–130.
9.
FallerK. C. (1988). Criteria for judging the credibility of children's statements about their sexual abuse. Child Welfare, 7(5), 389–401.
10.
FallerK. C. (1996). Evaluating children suspected of having been sexually abused.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
FallerK. C. (1998). The parental alienation syndrome: What is it and what data support it?Child Maltreatment, 3(2), 100–115.
12.
GardnerR. (1991). Sex abuse hysteria: Salem witch trials revisited.Cresskill, NJ: Creative Therapeutics.
13.
GardnerR. (1992). True and false allegations of child sex abuse.Cresskill, NJ: Creative Therapeutics.
14.
JampoleL., & WebberM. (1987). An assessment of the behavior of sexually abused and non-sexually abused children with anatomically correct dolls. Child Abuse and Neglect, 11, 187–192.
15.
JonesD., & McGrawE. M. (1987). Reliable and fictitious accounts of sexual abuse to children. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2(1), 27–45.
16.
KatzS., SchoenfeldD., LeventhalJ., & CicchettiD. (1995). The accuracy of children's reports with anatomically correct dolls. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 16(2), 71–76.
17.
LawsonL., & ChaffinM. (1992). False negatives in sexual abuse disclosure interviews. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7(4), 532–542.
18.
NathanD., & SendekerM. (1995). Satan's silence: Ritual abuse and the making of a modern American witch hunt.New York: Basic Books.
19.
OatesK., JonesD., DensonD., SirotnakA., & KrugmanR. (1996, August 20). Fictitious accounts of sexual abuse by children. Paper presented at the Eleventh International Congress on Child Abuse and Neglect, Dublin, Ireland.
20.
SaywitzK., GoodmanG., NicholasE., & Moan. (1991). Children's memory for a genital examination: Implications for child sexual abuse cases. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 682–691.
21.
SivanA., SchorD., KoepplG., & NobleL. (1988). Interaction of normal children with anatomical dolls. Child Abuse and Neglect, 12, 295–304.
22.
SorensonT., & SnowB. (1991). How children tell: The process of disclosure in child sexual abuse. Child Welfare, 70(1), 3–15.
23.
StewardM. S., StewardD. S., FarquharL., MyersJ., WelkerJ., JoyeN., DriskillJ., & MorganJ. (1996). Interviewing young children about body touch and handling. Monograph series of the Society for research on Child Development (SRCD), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
StickelG. (1993). Archaeological investigations of the McMartin Preschool site: Manhattan Beach, California. Available from E. Gary Stickel, Ph.D., Department of Archeology, UCLA.
25.
WatermanJ., KellyR., OlivieriM. K., & McCordJ. (1993). Behind the playground walls: Sexual abuse in preschools.New York: Guilford Press.
26.
WhiteS., StromG., SantilliG., & HalpinB. (1986). Interviewing young sexual abuse victims with anatomically correct dolls. Child Abuse and Neglect, 10, 519–529.