Restricted accessLetterFirst published online 2017-9
Response to “Concerning the Article Entitled ‘Judgment of Nasolabial Esthetics in Cleft Lip and Palate is not Influenced by Overall Facial Attractiveness’”
Al-OmariI, MillettDT, AyoubAF. Methods of assessment of cleft-related facial deformity: a review. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2005; 42: 145–156.
2.
Asher-McDadeC, RobertsC, ShawWC, GallagerC.Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1991; 28: 385–390.
3.
KocherK, KowalskiP, KolokithaOE, KatsarosC, FudalejPS. Judgment of nasolabial esthetics in cleft lip and palate is not influenced by overall facial attractiveness. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2016; 53: e45–e52.
4.
MosmullerDG, BijnenCL, Don GriotJP, KramerGJ, DisseMA, PrahlC, KuikDJ, NiessenFB. Comparison of two scoring systems in the assessment of nasolabial appearance in cleft lip and palate patients. J Craniofac Surg.2014; 25: 1222–1225.
5.
MosmullerDG, BijnenCL, KramerGJ, DisseMA, PrahlC, KuikDJ, NiessenFB, Don GriotJP. The Asher-McDade Aesthetic Index in comparison with two scoring systems in nonsyndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients. J Craniofac Surg.2015; 26: 1242–1245.
6.
MosmullerDG, GriotJP, BijnenCL, NiessenFB. Scoring systems of cleft-related facial deformities: a review of literature. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2013; 50: 286–296.
7.
MosmullerDGM, MulderFJ, Don GriotJPW. Concerning the article entitled “judgment of nasolabial esthetics in cleft lip and palate is not influenced by overall facial attractiveness”. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. In press.
8.
SharmaVP, BellaH, CadierMM, PigottRW, GoodacreTE, RichardBM. Outcomes in facial aesthetics in cleft lip and palate surgery: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg.2012; 65: 1233–1245.
