Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to examine whether mechanical elevation of the velum can directly affect the levator veli palatini muscle (LVP) activity using normal speakers as subjects.

Design:

Each subject was instructed to produce /mu/, /u/, /pu/, /su/, and /tsu/ in a speech task and to blow with maximum possible effort. Smoothed electromyographic activity of the LVP was recorded with an experimental palatal lift prosthesis (PLP) both in place and removed.

Participants:

Four normal speakers were used as subjects.

Results:

LVP activity for all tasks was significantly smaller (p < .001; Student's t test) with the PLP in place than without the PLP for all subjects. An analysis of variance (p < .001) clarified that activity ranges of the LVP were significantly different between the removal and placement conditions for all the subjects.

Conclusion:

The result was similar to that previously obtained for patients with velopharyngeal incompetence wearing a PLP. It is possible that the decrease in the LVP activity in association with placement of a PLP is caused by the direct effect of mechanical elevation, which decreases the distance the velopharyngeal mechanisms must travel for complete closure of the velopharynx.

Keywords

levator veli palatini palatal lift velopharynx velum

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Astley

The movement of the lateral walls of the nasopharynx: a cine-radio-graphic study.

J Laryngol Otol. 1958; 72: 325–328.

Blakeley

R.W.

Temporary speech prosthesis as an aid in speech training.

Cleft Palate Bull. 1960; 10: 63–65.

Blakeley

R.W.

Porter

D.R.

Unexpected reduction and removal of an obturator in a patient with palatal paralysis.

Br J Disord Commun. 1971; 6: 33–36.

Dickson

D.R.

Maue-Dickson

Velopharyngeal structure and function: a model for biomechanical analysis. In: Lass

N.J.

, ed. Speech and Language: Advances in Basic Research and Practice. Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press; 1980: 168.

Goto

Tightness in velopharyngeal closure and its regulatory mechanism.

J Osaka Univ Dent Soc. 1977; 22: 87–106.

Igresias

Kuehn

D.P.

Morris

H.L.

Simultaneous assessment of pharyngeal wall and velar displacement for selected speech sounds.

J Speech Hear Res. 1980; 23: 429–446.

Kuehn

D.P.

New therapy for treating hypernasal speech using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).

Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991; 88: 959–966.

Kuehn

D.P.

Folkins

J.W.

Cutting

C.B.

Relationships between muscle activity and velar position.

Cleft Palate J. 1982; 19: 25–35.

Kuehn

D.P.

Moon

J.B.

Levator veli palatini muscle activity in relation to intraoral air pressure variation.

J Speech Hear Res. 1994; 37: 1260–1270.

10.

Kuehn

D.P.

Moon

J.B.

Levator veli palatini muscle activity in relation to intraoral air pressure variation in cleft palate subjects.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1995; 32: 376–381.

11.

Kuehn

D.P.

Moon

J.B.

Folkins

J.W.

Levator veli palatini muscle activity in relation to intranasal air pressure variation.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993; 30: 361–368.

12.

Mazaheri

E.H.

Prosthodontic aspects of palatal elevation and palatopharyngeal stimulation.

J Prosthet Dent. 1976; 35: 319–326.

13.

McGrath

C.O.

Anderson

M.W.

Prosthetic treatment of velopharyngeal incompetence. In: Bardach

Morris

H.L.

, eds. Multidisciplinary Management in Cleft Lip and Palate. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1990: 809–815.

14.

Moon

J.B.

Canady

J.W.

Effects of gravity on velopharyngeal muscle activity during speech.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1995; 32: 371–375.

15.

Moon

J.B.

Smith

A.E.

Folkins

J.W.

Lemke

J.H.

Gartlan

Coordination of velopharyngeal activity during positioning of the soft palate.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1994; 31: 45–55.

16.

Shelton

R.L.

Lindquist

A.F.

Arndt

W.B.

Elbert

Youngstrom

K.A.

Effect of speech bulb reduction on movement of the posterior wall of the pharynx and posture of the tongue.

Cleft Palate J. 1971a; 8: 10–17.

17.

Shelton

R.L.

Lindquist

A.F.

Chisum

Arndt

W.B.

Youngstrom

K.A.

Stick

S.L.

Effect of prosthetic speech bulb reduction on articulation.

Cleft Palate J. 1968; 5: 195–204.

18.

Shelton

R.L.

Lindquist

A.F.

Knox

Wright

Arndt

W.B.

Elbert

Youngstrom

K.A.

The relationship between pharyngeal wall movements and exchangeable speech appliance sections.

Cleft Plate J. 1971b; 8: 145–158.

19.

Skolnick

M.L.

McCall

G.N.

Velopharyngeal competence and incompetence following pharyngeal flap surgery: a video-fluoroscopic study in multiple projections.

Cleft Palate J. 1972; 9: 1–12.

20.

Tachimura

Hara

Koh

Wada

Effect of temporary closure of oronasal fistula on levator veli palatini muscle activity.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997; 34: 505–511.

21.

Tachimura

Hara

Wada

Oral air pressure and nasal air flow rate on levator veli palatini muscle activity in patients wearing a speech appliance.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1995; 32: 382–389.

22.

Tachimura

Nohara

Hara

Wada

Effect of placement of a speech appliance on levator veli palatini muscle activity during blowing.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999; 36: 224–232.

23.

Tachimura

Nohara

Wada

Effect of placement of a speech appliance on levator veli palatini muscle activity during speech.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000; 37: 478–482.

24.

Weiss

C.E.

Success of an obturator relation program.

Cleft Palate J. 1971; 8: 291–297.

25.

Witzel

M.A.

Posnick

J.C.

Patterns and location of velopharyngeal valving problem: a typical findings on video nasopharyngoscopy.

Cleft Palate J. 1989; 26: 63–67.

26.

Wong

Weiss

C.E.

A clinical assessment of obturator-wearing cleft palate patients.

J Prosth Dent. 1972; 27: 632–639.

27.

Zwitman

D.H.

Sonderman

J.C.

Ward

P.H.

Variations in velopharyngeal closure assessed by endoscopy.

J Speech Hear Dis. 1974; 39: 366–372.

Change in Levator Veli Palatini Muscle Activity of Normal Speakers in Association with Elevation of the Velum Using an Experimental Palatal Lift Prosthesis

Abstract

Objective:

Design:

Participants:

Results:

Conclusion:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References