Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to describe the pressure-flow characteristics of a large sample of speakers without cleft palate ranging in age from early childhood to young adulthood.

Method

Speakers consisted of 223 children, teens, and adults without cleft palate categorized into five age groups: 6 through 8 years, 9 through 10, 11 through 12, 13 through 16, and 18 through 37 years. Speakers produced the syllables /mi/, /pi/, and /pA/, the word “hamper,” and the sentence “Peep into the hamper.” The pressure-flow method was used to determine oral air pressure, nasal airflow, and estimates of velopharyngeal (VP) orifice size associated with /m/ and /p/ production. Descriptive statistics were computed for each age group and speech sample. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) procedures were used to determine the effects of age, sex, and production level (word versus sentence) on the aerodynamic variables.

Results

ANOVA procedures indicated significant main effects (p < .01) of age on most of the aerodynamic variables during production of /m/ and /p/. No significant main effects or interactions involving sex were found for any variable. Regardless of age, approximately 95% to 99% of the speakers exhibited airtight VP closure during /p/ at syllable level, depending upon the selected nasal airflow criterion. ANOVA procedures also indicated significant main effects of production level (word versus sentence) on each of the aerodynamic variables during the /mp/ sequence. These effects appeared to be related to speaking rate.

Conclusions

The study suggests that speakers without cleft palate exhibit essentially complete VP closure during production of oral pressure consonants in isolated syllables, and developmental aspects of speech aerodynamics be considered during pressure-flow testing.

Keywords

nasal airflow oral air pressure pressure-flow method speech aerodynamics speech development

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andreassen

M.L.

Smith

B.E.

Guyette

T.W.

. Pressure-flow measurements for selected oral and nasal sound segments produced by normal adults. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992; 29: 1–9.

Barlow

S.M.

. Handbook of Clinical Speech Physiology. San Diego: Singular Publishing; 1999.

Brown

W.S.

McGlone

R.E.

. Relation of intraoral air pressure to oral cavity size. Folia Phoniatr. 1969; 21: 321–331.

Dalston

R.M.

Warren

D.W.

Morr

K.E.

Smith

L.R.

. Intraoral pressure and its relationship to velopharyngeal inadequacy. Cleft Palate J. 1988; 25: 210–219.

Fisher

K.V.

Swank

P.R.

. Estimating phonation threshold pressure. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997; 40: 1122–1129.

Guyette

T.W.

Carpenter

M.A.

. Accuracy of pressure-flow estimates of velopharyngeal orifice size in an analog model and human subjects. J Speech Hear Res. 1988; 31: 537–548.

Hoit

J.D.

Hixon

T.J.

. Age and speech breathing. J Speech Hear Res. 1987; 30: 351–366.

Hoit

J.D.

Watson

P.J.

Hixon

K.E.

McMahon

Johnson

C.L.

. Age and velopharyngeal function during speech production. J Speech Hear Res. 1994; 37: 295–302.

Kahane

. Age-related changes in the peripheral speech mechanism: structural and physiological changes. ASHA Rep. 1990; 19: 75–87.

10.

Kent

Carney

Severeid

. Velar movement and timing: evaluation of a model for binary control. J Speech Hear Res. 1974; 17: 470–488.

11.

Kuehn

D.P.

. A cineradiographic investigation of velar movement variables in two normals. Cleft Palate J. 1976; 13: 88–103.

12.

Leeper

H.A.

Tissington

M.L.

Munhall

K.G.

. Temporal characteristics of velopharyngeal function in children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998; 35: 215–221.

13.

Lubker

J.F.

. Velopharyngeal orifice area: a replication of analog experimentation. J Speech Hear Res. 1969; 12: 218–222.

14.

McKerns

Bzoch

K.R.

. Variations in velopharyngeal valving: the factor of sex. Cleft Palate J. 1970; 7: 652–662.

15.

Müller

E.M.

Brown

W.S.

. Variations in the supraglottic air pressure waveform and their articulatory interpretation. In: Lass

, ed. Speech and Language: Advances in Basic Research and Practice. Vol. 4. New York: Academic Press; 1980: 318–389.

16.

Netsell

Lotz

W.K.

Peters

J.E.

Schulte

. Developmental patterns of laryngeal and respiratory function for speech production. J Voice. 1994; 8: 123–131.

17.

Samlan

R.A.

Barlow

S.M.

. The effects of transition rate and vowel height on velopharyngeal airway resistance. In: Barlow

S.M.

, ed. Handbook of Clinical Speech Physiology. San Diego: Singular Publishing; 1999: 247–264.

18.

Seaver

E.J.

Dalston

R.M.

Leeper

H.A.

Adams

L.E.

. A study of nasometric values for normal nasal resonance. J Speech Hear Res. 1991; 34: 715–721.

19.

Smith

B.E.

Weinberg

. Prediction of velopharyngeal orifice area: a re-examination of model experimentation. Cleft Palate J. 1980; 17: 277–282.

20.

Thompson

A.E.

Hixon

T.J.

. Nasal air flow during normal speech production. Cleft Palate J. 1979; 16: 412–420.

21.

Vig

Zajac

D.J.

. Age and gender effects on nasorespiratory function in normal subjects. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993; 30: 279–284.

22.

Warren

D.W.

Dalston

R.M.

Trier

W.C.

Holder

M.B.

. A pressure-flow technique for quantifying temporal patterns of palatopharyngeal closure. Cleft Palate J. 1985; 22: 11–19.

23.

Warren

D.W.

Dalston

R.M.

Morr

K.E.

Hairfield

W.M.

Smith

L.R.

. The speech regulating system: temporal and aerodynamic responses to velopharyngeal inadequacy. J Speech Hear Res. 1989; 32: 566–575.

24.

Warren

D.W.

Devereux

J.L.

. An analog study of cleft palate speech. Cleft Palate J. 1966; 3: 103–114.

25.

Warren

D.W.

DuBois

A.B.

. A pressure-flow technique for measuring velopharyngeal orifice area during continuous speech. Cleft Palate J. 1964; 1: 52–71.

26.

Warren

D.W.

Hairfield

W.M.

Dalston

E.T.

. Effect of age on nasal cross-sectional area and respiratory mode in children. Laryngoscope. 1990; 100: 89–93.

27.

Yates

C.C.

McWilliams

B.J.

Vallino

. The pressure-flow method: some fundamental concepts. Cleft Palate J. 1990; 27: 193–198.

28.

Zajac

D.J.

. Velopharyngeal function in young and older adult speakers: evidence from aerodynamic studies. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997; 102: 1846–1852.

29.

Zajac

D.J.

Mayo

. Aerodynamic and temporal aspects of velopharyngeal function in normal speakers. J Speech Hear Res. 1996; 39: 1199–1207.

30.

Zajac

D.J.

Mayo

Kataoka

. Nasal coarticulation in normal speakers: a re-examination of the effects of gender. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998; 41: 503–510.

31.

Zajac

D.J.

Yates

C.C.

. Accuracy of the pressure-flow method in estimating induced velopharyngeal orifice area: effects of the flow coefficient. J Speech Hear Res. 1991; 34: 1073–1078.

Pressure-Flow Characteristics of /m/ and /p/ Production in Speakers without Cleft Palate: Developmental Findings

Abstract

Objective

Method

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References