Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the shape of the maxilla in Norma lateralis of cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients with non-CLP controls matched for sex and age. This study utilized elliptical Fourier functions to assess the presence of residual shape changes in the cleft palate maxilla after treatment, compared with controls.

Design

Longitudinal data (n = 25) were available from the Miami Craniofacial Anomalies Foundation. From these data, two samples were selected: group I (mean age and SD, 5.06 ± 1.82 years) after lip surgery and the initiation of palate surgery and group II (16.58 ± 2.42 years) well after the conclusion of surgery. Twenty-two of these patients were matched with controls (5.11 ± 1.33 and 15.91 ± 2.25 years, respectively). The maxillary outline as seen on the lateral radiograph was (1) traced, (2) fitted with a series of 48 closely placed points, (3) digitized, and (4) submitted to a specially written routine that computes elliptical Fourier functions (EFFs). These EFFs are close analogs of the bounded maxillary outline as judged by the residual or difference between the observed points and the predicted points generated by the Fourier function. Each maxillary outline was subsequently standardized for size and corrected for positioning in two-dimensional space.

Results and Conclusions

Utilizing a three-way multivariate analysis of variance, statistically significant shape differences were obtained for both young and older groups, as well as between the CLP and controls. No significant gender differences were found. Morphological differences consisted of a posterior repositioning of the nasal crest aspect in the CLP cases. These results suggest that although a clinically satisfactory treatment result was obtained, differences in maxillary shape remain.

Keywords

cleft palate elliptical Fourier functions growth maxilla shape

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berkowitz

Stereophotogrammetric analysis of casts of normal and abnormal palates.

Am J Orthod 1971; 60: 1–18.

Berkowitz

Cleft Lip and Palate. San Diego: Singular Press: 1997.

Berkowitz

Krischer

Pruzansky

Quantitative analysis of cleft palate casts.

Cleft Palate J 1974; 11: 134–160.

Berkowitz

Pruzansky

Stereophotogrammetry of serial casts of cleft palate.

Angle Orthod 1968; 38: 136–149.

Bishara

S.E.

Martinez

R.S.

Patron

V.H.

Dentofacial relationships in persons with unoperated clefts: comparisons between three cleft types.

Am J Orthod 1985; 88: 481–507.

Blum

A transformation for extracting new descriptors of shape. In: Wathen-Dunn

, ed. Models for the Perception of Speech and Visual Form. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1967.

Blum

Biological shape and visual science.

J Theor Biol 1973; 38: 205–287.

Bookstein

F.L.

The Measurement of Biological Shape and Shape Change. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1978; 24: 1–191.

Bookstein

F.L.

On the cephalometrics of skeletal change.

Am J Orthod 1982; 82: 177–182.

10.

Bookstein

F.L.

Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.

11.

Cheverud

J.M.

Richtsmeier

J.T.

Finite-element scaling applied to sexual dimorphism in rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatto) facial growth, Syst Zool 1986; 35: 381–399.

12.

Delfino

V.P.

Colonna

Vacca

Potente

Introna

Computer-aided skull/face superimposition.

Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1986; 7: 201–212.

13.

Diaz

Quacci

Dell'Orbo

Recognition of cell surface modulation by elliptic Fourier analysis.

Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1990; 31: 57–62.

14.

Ferson

Rohlf

F.J.

Koehn

R.K.

Measuring shape variation of two-dimensional outlines.

Syst Zool 1985; 43: 59–68.

15.

Heidbuchel

K.L.W.M.

Kuijpers-Jaglman

A.M.

Maxillary and mandibular dental-arch dimensions and occlusion in bilateral cleft lip and palate patients from 3 to 17 years of age.

Cleft Palate J 1997; 34: 21–26.

16.

Inoue

Fourier analysis of the forehead shape of skull and sex determination by use of the computer.

Forensic Sci Int 1990; 47: 101–112.

17.

Johnson

D.R.

Shape of vertebrae—an application of a generalized method. In: Dixon

A.D.

Sarnat

B.G.

, eds. Normal and Abnormal Bone Growth: Basic and Clincial Research. New York: Alan R. Liss; 1985.

18.

Jonsson

Thilander

Occlusion, arch dimensions, and craniofacial morphology after palatal surgery in a group of children with clefts in the secondary palate.

Am J Orthod 1976; 76: 243–255.

19.

Kilpeläinen

P.V.J.

Laine-Alava

M.T.

Lammi

Palatal morphology and type of clefting.

Cleft Palate J 1996; 33: 477–482.

20.

Klecka

W.R.

Discriminant Analysis. Quat. Appl. Soc. Sci. Ser. 19. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1980.

21.

Kuhl

F.P.

Giardina

C.R.

Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour.

Comput Graphics Imaging Prot: 1982; 18: 236–258.

22.

Lele

Euclidean distance matrix analysis (EDMA): estimation of mean form and mean form difference.

Math Geol 1993; 25: 573–602.

23.

Lele

Richtsmeier

J.T.

Euclidean distance matrix analysis: a coordinate free approach for comparing biological shapes using landmark data.

Am J Phys Anthropol 1991; 86: 415–427.

24.

Lele

Richtsmeier

J.T.

On comparing biological shapes: detection of influential landmarks.

Am J Phys Anthropol 1992; 87: 49–66.

25.

Lestrel

P.E.

Some problems in the assessment of morphological size and shape differences.

Yearh Phys Anthropol 1974; 18: 140–162.

26.

Lestrel

P.E.

A quantitative approach to skeletal morphology: Fourier analysis.

SPIE 1980; 166: 80–93.

27.

Lestrel

P.E.

A Fourier analytic procedure to describe complex morphologica shapes. In: Dixon

A.D.

Sarnat

B.G.

, eds. Factors and Mechanisms Influencins Bone Growth. New York: Alan R. Liss; 1982.

28.

Lestrel

P.E.

Method for analysing complex two-dimensional forms: elliptica Fourier functions.

Am J Hum Biol 1989a; 1: 149–164.

29.

Lestrel

P.E.

Some approaches toward the mathematical modeling of the cranio facial complex.

J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1989b; 9: 77–91.

30.

Lestrel

P.E.

Introduction and overview of Fourier descriptors. In: Lestrel

P.E.

ed. Fourier Descriptors and Their Applications in Biology. Cambridge Cambridge University Press; 1997a.

31.

Lestrel

P.E.

Morphometries of craniofacial form. In: Dixon

A.D.

Hoyte

D.A.N.

Rönning

, eds. Fundamentals of Craniofacial Growth. Boca Raton, FL CRC Press; 1997b.

32.

Lestrel

P.E.

Engstrom

Chaconas

S.J.

Bodt

A longitudinal study of the human nasal bone in Norma lateralis: size and shape considerations. In: Dixon

A.D.

Sarnat

B.G.

Hoyle

D.A.N.

, eds. Fundamentals of Bone Growth. Methodology and Applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1991.

33.

Lestrel

P.E.

Kerr

W.J.S.

Quantification of functional regulator therapy using elliptical Fourier functions.

Eur J Orthod 1993; 15: 481–491.

34.

Lohmann

G.P.

Eigenshape analysis of microfossils: a general morphometric procedure for describing changes in shape.

Math Geol 1983; 15: 659–672.

35.

Lohmann

G.P.

Schweitzer

P.N.

On eigenshape analysis. In: Rohlf

F.J.

Bookstein

F.L.

, eds. Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometric Workshop. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology Special Publ, 2; 1990.

36.

Lubischew

A.A.

On the use of discriminant functions in taxonomy.

Biometrics 1962; 18: 455–477.

37.

Mølsted

Dahl

Asymmetry of the palate in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Cleft Palate J 1990; 27: 184–192.

38.

Ray

T.S.

Application of eigenshape analysis to second order leaf shape ontogeny in Syngonium podophyllum (Araceae). In: Rohlf

F.J.

Bookstein

F.L.

, eds. Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometric Workshop. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology Special Publ. 2; 1990.

39.

Read

D.W.

From multivariate to qualitative measurement: representation of shape.

Hum Evol 1990; 5: 417–429.

40.

Read

D.W.

Lestrel

P.E.

A comment upon the uses of homologous-point measures in systematics: a reply to Bookstein et al.

Syst Zool 1986; 33: 241–253.

41.

Richtsmeier

J.T.

Cranial growth in Apert's syndrome as measured by finite element scaling analysis.

Acta Anat 1988; 133: 50–56.

42.

Rohlf

F.J.

Archie

J.W.

A comparison of Fourier methods for the description of wing shape in mosquitos (Diptera: Culicidac).

Syst Zool 1984; 33: 302–317.

43.

Straney

D.O.

Median axis methods in morphometries. In: Rohlf

F.J.

Bookstein

F.L.

, eds. Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometric Workshop. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology Special Publ. 2; 1990.

Shape Changes in the Cleft Palate Maxilla: A Longitudinal Study

Abstract

Objective

Design

Results and Conclusions

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References