The speech of 102 patients with complete unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate and 40 noncleft subjects was analysed using the NORAM (Nasal Oral Ratio Meter) instrument. The results obtained were compared with the perceptual judgments made by experienced listeners. A significant correlation was found between the NORAM values and the listener judgments. The NORAM instrument can thus be used as a complement to listener judgments in assessing hypernasality. A discussion of the acoustic and phonetic aspects of the differences between the instrumental and perceptual results is presented.
DalstonR., WarrenD.. Comparison of TONAR II, pressure-flow and listener judgments of hypemasality in the assessment of velopharyngeal function.Cleft Palate J1986; 23: 108–115.
2.
DalstonR., WarrenD., DalstonE.. Use of nasometry as a diagnostic tool for identifying patients with velopharyngeal impairment.Cleft Palate Craniofac J1991; 28: 184–189.
3.
DanielW.. Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in health sciences, New York: John Wiley, 1978: 12–13.
4.
DarleyF.L., AronsonA.E., BrownJ.R.. Motor speech disorders.Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1975: 289–293.
5.
De Serpa-LeitâoA., GalyasK.. Measuring nasality? A status report.STL-QPSR1974; 4: 35–37.
6.
FletcherS.. Theory and instrumentation for quantitative measurement of nasality.Cleft Palate J1970; 7: 601–609.
7.
FletcherS., BishopM.. Measurement of nasality with TONAR.Cleft Palate J1970; 7: 610–621.
8.
FletcherS.. “Nasalance” versus listener judgment of “nasality.”Cleft Palate J1976; 13: 31–44.
9.
HaapanenM-L. A simple method of evaluating perceived hypernasality.Folia Phoniatr1991; 43: 122–132.
10.
HaapanenM-L. Nasalance scores in normal Finnish speech.Folia Phoniatr1991; 43: 197–203.
11.
HammarbergB.. Perceptual and acoustic analysis of dysphonia. Studies in Log Phon. Thesis. 1 Huddinge University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, 1986.
12.
HoriiY.. An accelerometric approach to nasality measurement, a preliminary report.Cleft Palate J1980; 17: 254–261.
13.
HoriiY.. Commentary on: Moon J. The influence of nasal patency on accelerometric transduction of nasal bone vibration.Cleft Palate J1990; 27: 270–274.
14.
KarlingJ., LohmanderA., De Serpa-LeitâoA., GalyasK., LarsonO.. NORAM: calibration and operational advice for measuring nasality in cleft palate patients, Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg1985; 9: 261–267.
15.
KarlingJ., LarsonO., LeandersonR., HenningssonG.. Speech in unilateral and bilateral cleft palate patients from Stockholm.Cleft Palate Craniofac J1993; 30: 73–77.
16.
LippmanR.. Detecting nasalization using a low-cost miniature accelerometer.J Speech Hear Res1981; 24: 314–317.
17.
MollerK.T., StarrC.D.. The effects of listening conditions on speech ratings obtained in a clinical setting, Cleft Palate J1984; 21: 65–69.
18.
MoonJ.. The influence of nasal patency on accelerometric transduction of nasal bone vibration.Cleft Palate J1990; 27: 266–270.
19.
NordinK-E, LarsonO., NylénB., EklundG.. Early bone grafting in complete cleft lip and palate cases following maxillofacial orthopedics. I. The method and the skeletal development from seven to thirteen years of age.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg1983; 17: 33–50.
20.
RedenbaughM., ReichA.. Correspondence between an accelerometric nasal/voice amplitude ratio and listeners' direct magnitude estimations of hypemasality.J Speech Hear Res1985; 28: 273–281.
21.
SonninenA., LehtonenJ.. Studies on nasality.Proceedings from IALP 17th International Congress of Logopedics and Phoniatrics1977; 1: 575–584.
22.
Van DemarkD., BzochK., DalyD., FletcherS., McWilliamsB.J., PannbeckerM., WeinbergB.. Methods of assessing speech in relation to velopharyngeal function.Cleft Palate J1985; 22: 281–285.
23.
Van HattumR.J.. Articulation and nasality in cleft palate speakers.J Speech Hear Res1958; 1: 383–387.
