Abstract
The rationale for combining two standard cleft palate procedures is set forth. The circumstances in which this combination is recommended are outlined and diagrammed. By Joining the positive qualities of two established and popular methods, it is possible in certain cases to facilitate palate closure while reducing common minor complications by incorporating the good qualities of each procedure and reducing the negative.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Braithwaite F.
The importance of the levator muscle in cleft palate closure. Br J Plast Surg 1968 ; 21 : 60 –62 .
2.
Kilner T.P.
Cleft lip and palate repair technique. St Thomas Hosp Rep 1937 ; 2 : 127 .
3.
von Langenbeck B.
Weitere Erfahrungen im Gerbiete der Uranoplastik Mittlest Abloesung des Mucoperiostalen Gaumenueberzuges. Arch Klin Chir 1864 ; 4 : 1 .
4.
Lindsay W.K.
von Langenbeck palatorrhaphy. In:
Grabb W.C.
,
Rosenstein S.W.
,
Bzoch K.R.
, eds. Cleft lip and palate. Boston : Little, Brown , 393 –403 .
5.
Millard D.R.
Jr.
Wide and or short cleft palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 1962 ; 29 : 40 –57 .
6.
Millard D.R.
Jr.
The island flap in cleft palate surgery. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1963 ; 116 : 297 –300 .
7.
Millard D.R.
Jr.
Cleft craft. Vol, 3 , Boston : Little, Brown , 1980 .
8.
Millard D.R.
Jr.
,
Latham R.A.
Improved primary surgical and dental treatment of clefts. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990 ; 856 –871 .
9.
Wardill MEM.
The technique of operation for cleft palate. Br J Surg 1937 ; 25 : 117 –130 .