The Illinois Association of Craniofacial Teams (IACT) surveyed all new patient visits to member teams in an effort to assess the needs of patients in Illinois. The survey determined the number of patients, their age at initial visit, the location and status of their defect, and their history of team visits. Four hundred eighty new patient visits were recorded. The number of patients was substantially lower than expected, and the large majority of older children seeing a team for the first time had repaired defects. It is concluded that the main opportunity for improving the quality of care for patients with clefts in Illinois may be in increasing the use of cleft palate teams.
ConwayH., WaonerK.J.. Incidence of clefts in New York City.Cleft Palate J1966; 3: 284–290.
2.
EmanuelI., CulverB., EricksonJ.D., GuthrieB., SchuldbergD.. The further epidemiological differences of cleft lip and palate: a population study of clefts in King County, Washington, 1956–1965.Teratology1973; 7: 271–282.
3.
Fogh-AndersenP.. Incidence and aetiology. In EdwardsM., WatsonA.C.H. eds. Advances in the management of cleft palate.New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1980: 43–48.
4.
FoxD.R., LynchJ.I., BrauerR.O.. Physicians referral to cleft palate teams in Texas.Tex Med1986; 82: 32–35.
5.
GreeneJ.C., VermillionJ.R., HayS., GibbonsS.F., KershbaumS.. Epidemiologic study of cleft lip and cleft palate in four states.J Am Dent Assoc1964; 68: 387–404.
6.
GreeneJ.C., VermillionJ.R., HayS.. Utilization of birth certificates in epidemiologic studies of cleft lip and palate.Cleft Palate J1965; 2: 141–156.
7.
HayS.. Incidence of selected congenital anomalies in Iowa.Am J Epidemiol1971; 94: 572–584.
JonesM.C.. Etiology of facial clefts: prospective evaluation of 428 patients.Cleft Palate J1988; 25: 17–20.
11.
KernahanD.A.. The striped Y-a symbolic classification for cleft lips and palates.Plast Reconstr Surg1971; 47: 469–470.
12.
KnoxG., BraithwaiteF.. Cleft lips and palates in Northumberland and Durham.Arch Dis Child1963; 38: 66–70.
13.
Koepp-BakerH.. The craniofacial team. In: BzochK.R., ed. Communicative disorders related to cleft lip and palate.Boston: Little, Brown, 1979: 52–61.
14.
MeskinL.H., PruzanskyS.. A malformation profile of facial cleft patients and their siblings.Cleft Palate J1969; 6: 309–315.
15.
RollntckB.R., PruzanskyS.. Genetic services at a center for craniofacial anomalies.Cleft Palate J1981; 18: 304–313.
16.
ShprintzenR.J., Siegfl-SadewitzV.L., AmatoJ., GoldbergR.. Anomalies associated with cleft lip, cleft palate, or both.Am J Med Genet1985; 20: 585–595.
17.
StevensG.H.. Occurrence of cleft lip and cleft palate in Illinois 1978–1983. Presented at the American Cleft Palate Association Annual Meeting, Miami, Florida, 1985.
18.
StraussR.P., BroderH.. Interdisciplinary team care of cleft lip and palate: social and psychological aspects.Clin Plast Surg1985; 12: 543–551.
19.
WillL.A., AdussM.. Illinois Association of Craniofacial Teams: a new state organization.Cleft Palate J1987; 24: 339–341.
20.
CohnE.S., KnappD.M., McWilliamsB.J.. The team approach to cleft care in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.Pennsylvania Dent J1984; May/June.
21.
ScheurleJ., HabalM.B., FransN.P.Cleft palate teams and the craniofacial centers in Florida: a state network.Fla Lang Speech Hear Assoc J, 1986: July.
