Restricted accessLetterFirst published online 2017-7
Concerning the Article Entitled “Long Term Follow-Up of UCLP Patients: Surgical and Orthodontic Burden of Care during Growth and Final Orthognathic Surgery Need”
BerkowitzS., DuncanR., EvansC., FriedeH., Kuijpers-JagtmanA., Prahl-AndersonB., RosensteinS.Timing of cleft palate closure should be based on the ratio of the area of the cleft to that of the palatal segments and not on age alone.Plast Reconst Surg.2005; 115: 1483–1499.
2.
BerkowitzS., MejiaM., BystrikA.A comparison of the effects of the Latham-Millard procedure with those of a conservative treatment approach for dental occlusion and facial aesthetics in unilateral and bilateral complete cleft lip and palate: part 1. Dental occlusion.Plast Reconst Surg.2004; 113: 1–18.
3.
CuttingC., GraysonB.Presurgical nasoalveolar orthopedic molding in primary correction of the nose, lip and alveolus of infants born with unilateral and bilateral clefts.Cleft Pal J.2000; 37: 28–53.
4.
Hsin-Yi HsiehC., Wen-Ching KoE., Kuo-Ting ChinP., Chiung-ShingetH.The effect of gingivoperiosteoplasty on facial growth in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.Cleft Pal Craniof J.2010: 47: 439–446.
5.
MeazziniM.C., CapelloA.V., VentriniF., AutelitanoL., MorabitoA., GarattiniG., BrusatiR.Long-term follow-up of UCLP patients: surgical and orthodontic burden of care during growth and final orthognathic surgery need.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2015; 52: 688–697.
