Asher-McDadeC., RobertsC., ShawW.C., GallagerC.Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1991; 28: 385–391.
2.
de VetH.C.W., TerweeC.B., MokkinkL.B., KnolD.L.Reliability. In: de VetH.C.W., TerweeC.B., MokkinkL.B., KnolD.L., eds. Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide.New York: Cambridge University Press;2011: 96–149.
3.
KocherK., KowalskiP., KolokithaO.E., KatsarosC., FudalejP.S.Judgment of nasolabial esthetics in cleft lip and palate is not influenced by overall facial attractiveness.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2016; 53: e45–e52.
4.
MercadoA.M., RussellK.A., DaskalogiannakisJ., HathawayR.R., SembG., OzawaT., SmithA., LinA.Y., LongR.E.Jr. The Americleft Project: a proposed expanded nasolabial appearance yardstick for 5- to 7-year-old patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (CUCLP).Cleft Palate Craniofac J. In press.
5.
MosmullerD.G., GriotJ.P., BijnenC.L., NiessenF.B.Scoring systems of cleft-related facial deformities: a review of literature.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2013; 50: 286–296.
6.
MosmullerD.G.M., BijnenC.L., Don GriotJ.P.W., KramerG., DisseM., PrahlC., KuikD.J., NiessenF.B.The Asher-McDade aesthetic index in comparison with two scoring systems in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients.J Craniofac Surg.2015; 26: 1242–1245.
7.
PrahlC., Prahl-AndersenB., van't HofM.A., Kuijpers-JagtmanA.M.Infant orthopedics and facial appearance: a randomized clinical trial (Dutchcleft).Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2006; 43: 659–664.