BerkowitzS.Cleft Lip and Palate: Diagnosis & Management.2nd ed.Berlin: Springer-Verlag;2006.
2.
BerkowitzS.Gingivoperiosteoplasty as well as early palatal cleft closure is unproductive. J Craniofac Surg.2009: 20(suppl 2): 1747–1758.
3.
BerkowitzS.MejiaM.BystrikA.A comparison of the effects of the Latham-Millard procedure with those of a conservative treatment approach for dental occlusion and facial aesthetics in unilateral and bilateral complete cleft lip and palate: part 1. Dental occlusion. Plast Reconstr Surg.2004; 113: 1–18.
4.
BongaartsC.A.van't HofM.A.Prahl-AndersonB.DirksI.V.Kuijpers-JagtmanA.M.Infant orthopedics has no effect on maxillary arch dimension in the deciduous dentition of children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (Dutchcleft). Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2006; 43: 665–672.
5.
BrattstromV.MolstedK.Prahl-AndersonB.SembG.ShawW.C.The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 2: craniofacial form and nasolabial appearance. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2005; 42: 69–77.
6.
ChanK.T.HayesC.ShustermanS.MullikenJ.B.WillL.A.The effects of active infant orthopedics on occlusal relationships in unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2001; 40: 511–517.
7.
DecW.ShetyeP.R.DavidsonE.H.GraysonB.H.BrechtL.E.CuttingS.B.WarrenS.M.Presurgical nasoalveolar orthopedic molding in primary correction of the nose, lip and alveolus of infants born with unilateral and bilateral clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2013; 38: 193–198.
8.
GeorgiadeN.G.LathamR.S.Maxillary arch alignment in the bilateral cleft lip and palate infant using the pinned coaxial screw appliance. J Plast Reconstr Surg.1975; 52: 52–60.
9.
GraysonB.H.CuttingC.B.Presurgical nasoalveolar molding in primary correction of the nose, lip and alveolus of infants born with unilateral and bilateral clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2001; 38: 193–198.
10.
GraysonB.H.MaullD.Nasoalveolar molding for infants born with clefts of the lip, alveolus and palate. Clin Plast Surg.2004; 31: 149–158, vii.
11.
GraysonB.H.SantiagoP.E.BrechtL.E.CuttingC.B.Presurgical nasolaveolar molding in infants with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1999; 36: 486–498.
12.
Hsin-Yi HsiehC.Wen-Ching KoE.Kuo-Ting ChinP.Chiung-ShingetH.The effect of gingivoperiosteoplasty on facial growth in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2010; 47: 439–446.
13.
LeeC.T.GarfinkleJ.S.WarrenS.M.BrechtL.E.CuttingC.B.GraysonB.H.Nasoalveolar molding improves appearance of children with bilateral cleft lip-cleft palate. Plast Reconstr Surg.2008; 122: 1131–1137.
14.
MaticD.R.PowerS.M.The effect of gingivoperiosteoplasty following alveolar molding with a pin-retained Latham appliance versus secondary bone grafting on midfacial growth in patients with unilateral clefts. Plast Reconstr Surg.2008; 122: 863–870.
15.
MillardDRJr. The evolution of its surgery: alveolar and palatal deformities. In: Cleft Craft. Vol 3. Boston: Little, Brown; 1980.
16.
MillardDRJrLathamR.A.Improved primary surgical and dental treatment of clefts. Plast Reconstr Surg.1990; 86: 856–871.
17.
MullikenJ.B.Martinez-PerezD.The principle of rotation advancement for repair of unilateral complete cleft lip and nasal deformity: technical variations and analysis of results. Plast Reconstr Surg.1999; 104: 1247–1260.
18.
Nazarian MobinS.S.KaratsonyiA.VidarE.N.GamerS.GroperJ.HammoudehJ.A.UrataM.M.Is presurgical nasoalveolar molding therapy more effective in unilateral or bilateral cleft lip-cleft palate patients?Plast Reconstr Surg.2011; 127: 573–582.
19.
PowerS.M.MaticD.B.Gingivoperiosteoplasty following alveolar molding with a Latham appliance versus secondary bone grafting: the effects on bone production and midfacial growth in patients with bilateral clefts. Plast Reconstr Surg.2009; 124: 573–582.
20.
PrahlC.Kuijpers-JagtmanA.M.van't HofM.A.Prahl-AndersonB.A randomized prospective clinical trial into the effect of infant orthopaedics on maxillary arch dimensions in unilateral cleft lip and palate (Dutchcleft). Eur J Oral Sci.2001; 109: 297–305.
21.
SatoY.GraysonB.H.GarfinkleJ.S.BarillasI.MakiK.CuttingC.B.Success rate of gingivoperiosteoplasty with and without secondary bone grafts compared with secondary alveolar bone grafts alone. Plast Reconstr Surg.2008; 121: 1256–1367.
