The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness of different psychological interventions for children and adults with cleft lip and/or palate and their parents.
Design
We searched six databases including MEDLINE and EMBASE to June 2013 and checked bibliographies. We included research that evaluated any psychological intervention in studies in which at least 90% of the participants had cleft lip and/or palate or were parents of those with cleft lip and/or palate. Studies containing less than 90% were excluded unless they reported results separately for those with cleft lip and/or palate, or raw data were available upon request from the authors. Inclusion assessment, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were carried out independently by two reviewers.
Results
Seven studies were identified as inclusions, with only two studies being included in the full data analysis (one of which failed to meet the full inclusion criteria). The five remaining studies were included only in a narrative synthesis because data were available for people or parents of those with cleft lip and/or palate only. This highlights a distinct dearth of research into psychological intervention within the field of cleft lip and/or palate.
Conclusions
The review found no evidence to support any specific intervention. Key uncertainties need to be identified and addressed. Adequately powered, methodologically rigorous randomized controlled trials are needed to provide a secure evidence base for psychological intervention techniques in participants with cleft lip and/or palate and their parents.
BergerZ.E., DaltonL.J.Coping with a cleft: psychosocial adjustment of adolescents with a cleft lip and palate and their parents.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2009; 29: 352–356.
2.
BessellA., BroughV., ClarkeA., HarcourtD., MossT.P., RumseyN.Evaluation of the effectiveness of Face IT, a computer-based psychosocial intervention for disfigurement-related distress.Psychol Health Med.2012; 5: 565–577.
3.
BessellA., MossT.P.Evaluating the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for individuals with visible differences: a systematic review of the empirical literature.Body Image.2007; 4: 227–238.
4.
Billaud FeragenK., BorgeA.I.H.Peer harassment and satisfaction with appearance in children with and without a facial difference.Body Image.2010: 97–105.
5.
CadoganJ., BennunI.Face value: an exploration of the psychological impact of orthognathic surgery.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg.2011; 49: 376–380.
6.
CarrA.What Works With Children, Adolescents and Adults: A Review of Research on the Effectiveness of Psychotherapy.Hove: Routledge;2009.
7.
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD).Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness. CRD Report Number 4.2nd ed. Available at http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/report4.htm. Accessed January 19, 2006.
8.
ChenJ.F., WangC.F.Introduction of critical appraisal of medical literature.Med Dispute Mediation.2009; 42: 19–24.
9.
Clinical Standard Advisory Group.Cleft lip and or palate. Report of a CSAG Committee.London: Department of Health;1998.
10.
CollettB.R., SpeltzM.L.Social-emotional development of infants and young children with orofacial clefts.Infant Young Child.2006; 19: 262–291.
11.
Dixon-WoodsM.S., AgarwalS., JonesD., YoungB., SuttonA.Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods.J Health Serv Res Policy.2005; 10: 45–53.
12.
EndrigaM.C., Kapp-SimonK.A.Psychological issues in craniofacial care: state of the art.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1999; 36: 3–11.
13.
HearstD., MiddletonJ.Psychological intervention and models of current working practice. In: LansdownR., RumseyN., BradburyE., CarrT., PartridgeJ., eds. Visibly Different: Coping With Disfigurement.Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann;1997.
14.
HigginsJ.P.T., GreenS.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.Oxford: Cochrane Collaboration;2011.
15.
HuntO., BurdenD., HepperP., JohnstonC.The psychosocial effects of cleft lip and palate: a systematic review.Eur J Orthod.2005; 27: 274–285.
16.
James Lind Alliance (JLA).Cleft lip and palate: a JLA priority setting partnership. Available at http://www.lindalliance.org/CleftPSP.asp. Accessed June 28, 2013.
17.
Kapp-SimonK.A., McGuireD.E., LongB.C., SimonD.J.Addressing quality of life issues in adolescents: social skills interventions.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2005; 42: 45–50.
18.
KentG.Understanding experiences of people with disfigurement: an integration of four models of social and psychological functioning.Psychol Health Med.2000; 5: 117–129.
19.
LearyM.R.A brief version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale.Pers Soc Psychol Bull.1983; 9: 371–376.
20.
KleveL., RumseyN., Wyn-WilliamsM., WhiteP.The effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural interventions provided at Outlook: a disfigurement support unit.J Eval Clin Pract.2002; 8: 387–395.
21.
LockhartE.The mental health needs of children and adolescents with cleft lip and/or palate.Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry.2003; 8: 7–16.
22.
MaddernL.H., CadoganJ.C., EmersonM.P.Outlook: a psychological service for children with a different appearance.Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry.2006; 11: 431–443.
23.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).Behaviour Change at Population, Community and Individual Levels. NICE Public Health Guidance 6.London: NICE;2007.
24.
NelsonP., GlennyA-M, KirkS., CaressA-L. Parents’ experiences of caring for a child with a cleft lip and/or palate: a review of the literature.Child Care Health Dev.2012; 38: 6–20.
25.
NewellR., ClarkeM.Evaluation of a self-help leaflet in treatment of social difficulties following facial disfigurement.Int J Nurs Stud.2000; 3: 381–388.
26.
NoarJ.H.Questionnaire survey of attitudes and concerns of patients with cleft lip and palate and their parents.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1991; 28: 279–284.
27.
NoarJ.H.A questionnaire survey of attitudes and concerns of three professional groups involved in the cleft palate team.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1992; 29: 92–95.
28.
PelchatD., LefebvreH., ProulxM., ReidyM.Parental satisfaction with an early family intervention program.J Perinat Neonat Nurs.2004; 18: 128–144.
29.
PopeA.W., SnyderH.T.Psychosocial adjustment in children and adolescents with a craniofacial anomaly: age and sex patterns.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2005; 42: 349–354.
30.
ReltonC., TorgersonD., O'CathainA., NichollJ.Rethinking pragmatic randomised controlled trials: introducing the “cohort multiple randomised controlled trial” design.Br Med J.2010; 340: 963–967.
31.
RobinsonE., RumseyN., PartridgeJ.An evaluation of the impact of social integration skills training for facially disfigured people.Br J Plast Surg.1996; 49: 281–289.
32.
RothA., FonagyP.What Works for Whom? A Critical Review of Psychotherapy Research.2nd ed.New York: Guilford Press;2005.
33.
RothA., TargetM., CottrellD., PhillipsJ., KurtzZ.What Works for Whom: A Critical Review of Treatments for Children and Adolescents.New York: Guilford Press;2002.
34.
RumseyN., StockN.M.Living with a cleft: psychological challenges, support and intervention. In: BerkowitzS., ed. Cleft Lip and Palate: Diagnosis and Management.3rd ed.Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg; 2013.
35.
SandyJ., KilpatrickN., PerssonM., BessellA., WaylenA., NessA., IrelandA.Why are multi-centre clinical observational studies still so difficult to run?Br Dent J.2011; 211: 59–61.
36.
ThompsonA., KentG.Adjusting to disfigurement: processes involved in dealing with being visibly different.Clin Psychol Rev.2001; 21: 663–682.
37.
TurnerS.R., ThomasP.W.N., DowellT., RumseyN., SandyJ R.Psychological outcomes amongst cleft patients and their families.Br J Plast Surg.1997; 50: 1–9.
38.
VieiraA.R.Unravelling human cleft lip and palate research.J Dent Res.2008; 87: 119–125.
