In spite of studies reporting a relatively high frequency of additional conditions in children with a cleft lip and/or cleft palate (CUP), almost no research has focused on this clinically important subgroup. The objective of this study was to compare psychosocial adjustment in children with CUP with and without an additional condition.
Design
Cross-sectional data based on routine psychological assessments at age 10 years, with comparisons to national reference groups.
Setting
Centralized treatment, Norway.
Participants
Two hundred five children with CUP (participation rate: 80.1%) from three consecutive birth cohorts.
Outcome measures
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (self-report and parent report) and the Child Experience Questionnaire (self-report).
Results
Eighty-one children (39.5%) were identified as having at least one condition in addition to the cleft. These children reported significantly more psychosocial difficulties than children with a cleft alone. Differences between specific conditions were minor. Children with a cleft alone (n = 124) reported mean scores that were comparable to those reported by the reference group. There were no differences in adjustment between children with a visible versus a non-visible cleft.
Conclusions
The present study highlights the need for research to be conducted in children with CUP who have additional conditions to provide better knowledge and clinical care for a potentially vulnerable subgroup of children and their parents.
AnthonyK.K.GilK.M.SchanbergL.E.Brief report: parental perceptions of child vulnerability in children with chronic illness. J Pediatr Psychol.2003; 28: 185–190.
2.
BakerS.R.OwensJ.SternM.WillmotD.Coping strategies and social support in the family impact of cleft lip and palate and parents' adjustment and psychological distress. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2009; 46: 229–236.
3.
BergerZ.E.DaltonL.J.Coping with a cleft: psychosocial adjustment of adolescents with a cleft lip and palate and their parents. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2009; 46: 435–443.
4.
EmersonM.Spencer-BowdageS.BatesA.Relationships between self-esteem, social experiences and satisfaction with appearance: standardisation and construct validation of two cleft audit measures. Presented at: The Craniofacial Society of Great Britain and Ireland's Annual Scientific Conference, “Setting a Positive Agenda in Cleft and Craniofacial Care”; April, 2004; Bath, United Kingdom.
5.
FeragenK.J.B.Experiences of people living with visible differences. Congenital conditions. In: RumseyN.HarcourtD., eds. Oxford Handbook of Psychology of Appearance.Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2012: 353–371.
6.
FeragenK.J.B.BorgeA.I.H.Peer harassment and satisfaction with appearance in children with and without a facial difference. Body Image.2010; 7: 97–105.
7.
FeragenK.J.B.BorgeA.I.H.RumseyN.Social experience in 10-year-old children born with a cleft: exploring psychosocial resilience. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2009; 46: 65–74.
8.
FeragenK.J.B.StockN.RumseyN.Towards a reconsideration of inclusion and exclusion criteria in cleft lip and palate: Implications for psychological research. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. In Press.
9.
FerroM.A.BoyleM.H.Longitudinal invariance of measurement and structure of global self-concept: a population-based study examining trajectories among adolescents with and without chronic illness. J Pediatr Psychol.2013; 38: 425–437.
10.
GoodmanR.The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry.1997; 38: 581–586.
11.
GoodmanR.Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry.2001; 40: 1337–1345.
12.
HuntO.BurdenD.HepperP.JohnstonC.The psychosocial effects of cleft lip and palate: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod.2005; 27: 274–285.
13.
HuntingtonD.D.BenderW.N.Adolescents with learning disabilities at risk? Emotional well-being, depression, suicide. J Learn Disabil.1993; 26: 159–166.
14.
HymanS.L.ShoresA.NorthK.N.The nature and frequency of cognitive deficits in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Neurology.2005; 65: 1037–1044.
15.
LavigneJ.V.Faier-RoutmanJ.Psychological adjustment to pediatric physical disorders: a meta-analytic review. J Pediatr Psychol.1992; 17: 133–157.
16.
MartinezM.Smith CarterJ.LegatoL.J.Social competence in children with chronic illness: a meta-analytic review. J Pediatr Psychol.2011; 36: 878–890.
17.
MaughanB.CarrollJ.Literacy and mental disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry.2006; 19: 350–354.
18.
MileradJ.LarsonO.HagbergC.IdebergM.Associated malformations in infants with cleft lip and palate: a prospective, population-based study. Pediatrics.1997; 100: 180–186.
19.
NollR.B.BukowskiW.B.Commentary: Social competence in children with chronic illness: the devil is in the details. J Pediatr Psychol.2012; 37: 959–966.
20.
ObelC.HeiervangE.RodriguezA.HeyerdahlS.SmedjeH.SouranderA.GudmundssonO.O.Clench-AasJ.ChristensenE.HeianF.. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in the Nordic countries. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry.2004; 13: 32–39.
21.
PerssonC.ElanderA.Lohmander-AgerskovA.SöderpalmE.Speech outcomes in isolated cleft palate: impact of cleft extent and additional malformations. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2002; 39: 397–408.
22.
PertschukM.J.WhitakerL.A.Social and psychological effects of craniofacial deformity and surgical reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg.1982; 9: 297–306.
23.
PinquartM.ShenY.Behavior problems in children and adolescents with chronic physical illness: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Psychol.2011; 36: 1003–1016.
24.
PopeA.W.SnyderH.T.Psychosocial adjustment in children and adolescents with a craniofacial anomaly: age and sex patterns. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2005; 42: 349–354.
25.
RichterJ.SagatunA.HeyerdahlS.OppedalB.RøysambE.The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) - self-report. An analysis of its structure in a multiethnic urban adolescent sample. J Child Psychol Psychiatry.2011; 52: 1002–1011.
26.
RønningJ.A.HandegaardB.H.SouranderA.MørchW-T. The Strengths and Difficulties self-report Questionnaire as a screening instrument in Norwegian community samples. Eur Child Adol Psychiatry.2004; 13: 73–82.
27.
RumseyN.HarcourtD.Body image and disfigurement: issues and interventions. Body Image.2004; 1: 83–97.
28.
RumseyN.StockN.M.Living with a cleft: psychological challenges, support and intervention. In: BerkowitzS., ed. Cleft Lip and Palate: Diagnosis and Management.3rd ed.Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.2013: 907–917
29.
SvetazM.V.IrelandM.BlumR.Adolescents with learning disabilities: risk and protective factors associated with emotional well-being: findings from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. J Adol Health.2000; 27: 340–348.
30.
SwanenburgV.BeemerF.A.MellenberghG.J.WoltersW.H.Heineman-de BoerJ.A.An investigation of the relationship between associated congenital malformations and the mental and psychomotor development of children with clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2003; 40: 297–303.
31.
TerrasM.M.ThompsonL.C.MinnisH.Dyslexia and psychosocial functioning: an exploratory study of the role of self-esteem and understanding. Dyslexia.2009; 15: 304–327.
32.
ThompsonA.KentG.Adjusting to disfigurement processes involved in dealing with being visibly different. Clin Psychol Rev.2001; 21: 663–682.
33.
TurnerS.R.ThomasP.W.DowellT.RumseyN.SandyJ.R.Psychological outcomes amongst cleft patients and their families. Br J Plast Surg.1997; 50: 1–9.
34.
Van RoyB.GroholtB.HeyerdahlS.Clench-AasJ.Self-reported strengths and difficulties in a large Norwegian population 10–19 years. Age and gender specific results of the extended SDQ-questionnaire. Eur Child Adol Psychiatry.2006; 15: 189–198.
35.
Van RoyB.VeenstraM.Clench-AasJ.Construct validity of the five-factor Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in pre-, early, and late adolescence. J Child Psychol Psychiatry.2008; 49: 1304–1312.
36.
Van RoyB.GroholtB.HeyerdahlS.Clench-AasJ.Understanding discrepancies in parent-child reporting of emotional and behavioural problems: effects of relational and socio-demographic factors. BMC Psychiatry.2010; 10: 56.
