Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

To better understand how individuals with cleft lip and palate (CLP) perceive and experience their treatment process and how these perceptions and experiences change over the life course.

Design

Qualitative in-depth semistructured interviews with 11 adults with nonsyndromal complete CLP.

Participants/Setting

Individuals from three Canadian cities were recruited by convenience and theoretical sampling through AboutFace International. The number of participants was determined by the principle of theoretical saturation.

Results

The experience of individuals with CLP through the treatment process changes over the life course. In childhood and early adolescence, most individuals experience stigma, negative self-perception, and as a result were more prone to perceiving the treatment process not only as unbearably burdensome but also as fueling their feeling of “defectiveness.” In adulthood, participants' self-perception improved, partly because of definitive surgical correction, leading them to realize treatment benefits and reappraise the treatment process as satisfactory rather than burdensome. Subsequently, some individuals pursued further surgeries hoping for additional psychological gains, in lieu of psychosocial interventions addressing the underpinnings of residual feelings of “defectiveness.” This led to dissatisfaction and frustration when the procedures did not lead to the hoped-for psychological gains.

Conclusions

The results emphasize the importance of self-perception in determining how participants perceive several important aspects of the treatment experience throughout the life course. Further studies should focus on how to incorporate self-perception as an important variable and outcome in the treatment process.

Keywords

bullying cleft lip and palate grounded theory life course qualitative self-perception stigma treatment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aspinall

C.L.

Anticipating benefits and decreasing burdens: the responsibility inherent in pediatric plastic surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2010; 21: 1330–1334.

Ben-Shlomo

Kuh

A lifecourse approach to chronic disease epidemiology: conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives. Int J Epidemiol. 2002; 31: 285–293.

Broder

Strauss

R.P.

Self-concept of early primary school age children with visible or invisible defects. Cleft Palate J. 1989; 26: 114–118.

Corbin

J.M.

Strauss

Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2008.

Creswell

J.W.

Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1997.

Denzin

Lincoln

Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1994.

Edwards

Patrick

Topolski

Aspinall

Mouradian

Speltz

Approaches to craniofacial-specific quality of life assessment in adolescents. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005; 42: 19–24.

Havstam

Laakso

Ringsberg

K.C.

Making sense of the cleft: young adults' accounts of growing up with a cleft and deviant speech. J Health Psychol. 2010; 16: 22–30.

Hodgkinson

Brown

Duncan

Grant

Mcnaughton

Thomas

Mattick

C.R.

Management of children with cleft lip and palate: a review describing the application of multidisciplinary team working in this condition based upon the experiences of a regional cleft lip and palate centre in the United Kingdom. Fetal Matern Med Rev. 2005; 16: 1–27.

10.

Hunt

Burden

Hepper

Stevenson

Johnston

Self-reports of psychosocial functioning among children and young adults with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006; 43: 598–605.

11.

Jeffery

S.L.

Boorman

J.G.

Patient satisfaction with cleft lip and palate services in a regional centre. Br J Plast Surg. 2001; 54: 189–191.

12.

Lockhart

The mental health needs of children and adolescents with cleft lip and/or palate. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2003; 8: 7–16.

13.

Mossey

P.A.

Little

Munger

R.G.

Dixon

M.J.

Shaw

W.C.

Cleft lip and palate. Lancet. 2009; 374: 1773–1785.

14.

Mouradian

Are we helping children? In: Parens

, ed. Surgically Shaping Children: Technology, Ethics, and the Pursuit of Normality. New York: The John Hopkins University Press; 2006: 141–156.

15.

Nelson

P.A.

Qualitative approaches in craniofacial research. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009; 46: 245–251.

16.

Oosterkamp

B.C.

Dijkstra

P.U.

Remmelink

H.J.

van Oort

R.P.

Goorhuis-Brouwer

S.M.

Sandham

de Bont

L.G.

Satisfaction with treatment outcome in bilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 36: 890–895.

17.

Parens

Surgically Shaping Children: Technology, Ethics, and the Pursuit of Normality. New York: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2006.

18.

Pope

Speltz

Research on psychosocial issues of children with craniofacial anomalies: progress and challenges. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997; 34: 371–373.

19.

Richman

L.C.

Holmes

C.S.

Eliason

M.J.

Adolescents with cleft lip and palate: self-perceptions of appearance and behavior related to personality adjustment. Cleft Palate J. 1985; 22: 93–96.

20.

Robin

Baty

Franklin

Guyton

Mann

Woolley

Waite

P.D.

Grant

The multidisciplinary evaluation and management of cleft lip and palate. Southern Med J. 2006; 99: 1111–1120.

21.

Semb

Brattström

Misted

Prahl-Andersen

Zuurbier

Rumsey

Shaw

W.C.

The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 4: relationship among treatment outcome, patient/parent satisfaction, and the burden of care. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005; 42: 83–92.

22.

Sinko

Jagsch

Prechtl

Watzinger

Hollmann

Baumann

Evaluation of esthetic, functional, and quality-of-life outcome in adult cleft lip and palate patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005; 42: 355–361.

23.

Strauss

Corbin

J.M.

Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.

24.

Strauss

R.P.

, The American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association Team Standards Committee. Cleft palate and craniofacial teams in the United States and Canada: a national survey of team organization and standards of care. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998; 35: 473–480.

Living with Cleft Lip and Palate: The Treatment Journey

Abstract

Objective

Design

Participants/Setting

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References