Airway Management in Pierre Robin Sequence: Patterns of Practice

Abstract

Objectives

To report survey results from American Cleft Palate–Craniofacial Association members on the practice patterns of airway obstruction management in patients with Pierre Robin sequence.

Design

A 10-question online survey was sent and the data were reviewed.

Setting

Online survey of members of the American Cleft Palate–Craniofacial Association.

Patients

Surveys assessed management patterns of patients with Pierre Robin sequence whom a surgeon member of the American Cleft Palate–Craniofacial Association treated for airway obstruction.

Interventions

The survey comprised data on management strategies for airway obstruction in Pierre Robin sequence, including tracheostomy, tongue-lip adhesion, mandibular distraction, and treatments that falls in the “other” category.

Results

A total of 87 American Cleft Palate–Craniofacial Association members completed the survey. Respondents' results were analyzed as a whole and by individual subspecialty: plastic surgery (n = 33), oromaxillofacial surgery (n = 21), and otolaryngology (n = 29). Although most of the surgeons were trained to manage airway obstruction in Pierre Robin sequence patients using tracheostomy (47%, n = 39) and tongue-lip adhesion (31%, n = 26), 48% reported a current preference for mandibular distraction (n = 40). Of surgeons who preferred to manage Pierre Robin sequence with tongue-lip adhesion (n = 23), 65% were trained to do so (n = 15). Surgeons preferring mandibular distraction (n = 40) and tracheostomy (n = 14) more often reported they were trained to manage Pierre Robin sequence with tracheostomy.

Conclusions

Currently there are various practice patterns for the management of airway obstruction in Pierre Robin sequence. Training habits and subspecialty category may influence a surgeon's preference in patients who fail conservative therapy. Treatment guidelines are lacking and may require significant collaboration among centers and subspecialties to develop a more standardized approach to a challenging clinical entity.