To identify factors related to quality of life (QoL) and satisfaction with nasal appearance among patients treated for unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP).
Design
Cross-sectional population study with long-term follow-up.
Patients/Settings
All patients with UCLP born between 1960 and 1987, treated at Uppsala University Hospital, were invited (n = 109); 86 (79%) participated. Mean follow-up time was 35 years.
Main Outcome Measures
Quality of life was measured with Short Form–36 (SF-36) and analyzed using mental and physical cluster scores (MCS and PCS). Nasal appearance was self-assessed with the “Satisfaction With Appearance” questionnaire and by panel judgment. Multivariate regression analyses explored endogenous factors (age, gender, infancy cleft width, nasal function, nasolabial appearance) and exogenous factors (marital status, number of children, education level, operation method, number of rhinoplasties performed).
Results
A larger cleft width in infancy was associated with less satisfaction with nasal appearance as adults. A lower mental health QoL was associated with less satisfaction with nasal appearance. Despite female gender being linked to less satisfaction with nasal appearance, it was associated with higher mental health QoL. Higher resistance during nasal breathing was associated with lower physical health QoL.
Conclusions
Gender and infant cleft width may affect QoL and satisfaction with nasal appearance among adults. They are potential predictive factors for satisfaction with nasal appearance and QoL during adulthood. The correlation of nasal function impairment and decreased physical health QoL underlines the importance of treatment of nasal symptoms in these patients.
AbyholmF.E.BerglandO.SembG.Secondary bone grafting of alveolar clefts: a surgical/orthodontic treatment enabling a non-prosthodontic rehabilitation in cleft lip and palate patients. Scand J Plastic Reconstructive Surg.1981; 15: 127–140.
2.
Al-OmariI.MillettD.T.AyoubA.F.Methods of assessment of cleft-related facial deformity: a review. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2005; 42: 145–156.
3.
AnastassovG.E.JoosU.ZollnerB.Evaluation of the results of delayed rhinoplasty in cleft lip and palate patients: functional and aesthetic implications and factors that affect successful nasal repair. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg.1998; 36: 416–424.
4.
Asher-McDadeC.BrattstromV.DahlE.McWilliamJ.MolstedK.PlintD.A.Prahl-AndersenB.SembG.ShawW.C.TheR.P.A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: part 4. Assessment of nasolabial appearance. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1992; 29: 409–412.
5.
Asher-McDadeC.RobertsC.ShawW.C.GallagerC.Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1991; 28: 385–390.
6.
BeckerM.SvenssonH.SarnasK.V.JacobssonS.Von Langenbeck or Wardill procedures for primary palatal repair in patients with isolated cleft palate—speech results. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg.2000; 34: 27–32.
7.
BerscheidE.GangestadS.The social psychological implications of facial physical attractiveness. Clin Plast Surg.1982; 9: 289–296.
8.
BroderH.L.RichmanL.C.MathesonP.B.Learning disability, school achievement, and grade retention among children with cleft: a two-center study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1998; 35: 127–131.
9.
BroderH.L.SmithF.B.StraussR.P.Effects of visible and invisible orofacial defects on self-perception and adjustment across developmental eras and gender. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1994; 31: 429–436.
10.
BroderH.StraussR.P.Self-concept of early primary school age children with visible or invisible defects. Cleft Palate J.1989; 26: 114–117.
11.
CheungL.K.LohJ.S.HoS.M.Psychological profile of Chinese with cleft lip and palate deformities. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2007; 44: 79–86.
12.
ChuoC.B.SearleY.JeremyA.RichardB.M.SharpI.SlatorR.The continuing multidisciplinary needs of adult patients with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2008; 45: 633–638.
13.
DaninoA.GradellJ.MalkaG.MoutelG.HerveC.RosilioC.Social adjustment in French adults from who had undergone standardised treatment of complete unilateral cleft lip and palate [in French]. Ann Chir Plast et Esthet.2005; 50: 202–205.
14.
EmersonM.Spencer-BowdageS.BatesA.Relationships between self-esteem, social experiences and satisfaction with appearance: standardisation and construct validation of two cleft audit measures. Presented at the Annual Scientific Conference, The Craniofacial Society of Great Britain and Ireland; 2004; Bath, UK.
15.
EndrigaM.C.Kapp-SimonK.A.Psychological issues in craniofacial care: state of the art. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1999; 36: 3–11.
16.
FeragenK.B.BorgeA.I.Peer harassment and satisfaction with appearance in children with and without a facial difference. Body Image.2010; 3: 97–105.
17.
FeragenK.B.BorgeA.I.RumseyN.Social experience in 10-year-old children born with a cleft: exploring psychosocial resilience. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2009; 46: 65–74.
18.
FooP.SampsonW.J.RobertsR.M.JamiesonL.M.DavidD.J.General health-related quality of life and oral health impact among Australians with cleft compared with population norms: age and gender differences. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. In press.
19.
FriedeH.Maxillary growth controversies after two-stage palatal repair with delayed hard palate closure in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients: perspectives from literature and personal experience. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2007; 44: 129–136.
20.
FriedeH.PriedeD.MollerM.MaulinaI.LiljaJ.BarkaneB.Comparisons of facial growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated by different regimens for two-stage palatal repair. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg.1999; 33: 73–81.
21.
FukushiroA.P.TrindadeI.E.Nasal airway dimensions of adults with cleft lip and palate: differences among cleft types. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2005; 42: 396–402.
22.
GrossmannN.BrinI.AizenbudD.SichelJ.Y.Gross-IsseroffR.SteinerJ.Nasal airflow and olfactory function after the repair of cleft palate (with and without cleft lip). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod.2005; 100: 539–544.
23.
HellquistR.SvardstromK.PontenB.A longitudinal study of delayed periosteoplasty to the cleft alveolus. Cleft Palate J.1983; 20: 277–288.
24.
HuntO.BurdenD.HepperP.JohnstonC.The psychosocial effects of cleft lip and palate: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod.2005; 27: 274–285.
25.
JakobssonO.P.PontenB.Closure of the cleft palate in one or two stages: the surgical methods. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg.1990; 24: 149–155.
ManiM.CarlssonM.MarcussonA.Quality of life varies with gender and age among adults treated for unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2010; 47: 491–498.
28.
ManiM.MorénS.ThorvardssonO.JakobssonO.SkoogV.HolmströmM.Objective assessment of the nasal airway in unilateral cleft lip and palate: a long-term study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2010; 47: 217–224.
29.
ManiM.SembG.Andlin-SobockiA.Nasolabial appearance in adults with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate: relationship between professional and lay rating and patient satisfaction questionnaire. J Plast Surg Hand Surg.2010; 44: 191–198.
30.
MarcussonA.AkerlindI.PaulinG.Quality of life in adults with repaired complete cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2001; 38: 379–385.
31.
MarcussonA.PaulinG.OstrupL.Facial appearance in adults who had cleft lip and palate treated in childhood. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg.2002; 36: 16–23.
32.
NoorS.N.MusaS.Assessment of patients' level of satisfaction with cleft treatment using the Cleft Evaluation Profile. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2007; 44: 292–303.
33.
OosterkampB.C.DijkstraP.U.RemmelinkH.J.van OortR.P.Goorhuis-BrouwerS.M.SandhamA.de BontL.G.Satisfaction with treatment outcome in bilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg.2007; 36: 890–895.
34.
ParwazM.A.SharmaR.K.ParasharA.NandaV.BiswasG.MakkarS.Width of cleft palate and postoperative palatal fistula—do they correlate?J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg.2009; 62: 1559–1563.
ReiserE.SkoogV.GerdinB.Andlin-SobockiA.Association between cleft size and crossbite in children with cleft palate and unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2010; 47: 175–181.
SembG.BrattstromV.MolstedK.Prahl-AndersenB.ZuurbierP.RumseyN.ShawW.C.The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 4: relationship among treatment outcome, patient/parent satisfaction, and the burden of care. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2005; 42: 83–92.
39.
SinkoK.JagschR.PrechtlV.WatzingerF.HollmannK.BaumannA.Evaluation of esthetic, functional, and quality-of-life outcome in adult cleft lip and palate patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2005; 42: 355–361.
40.
SkoogT.A design for the repair of unilateral cleft lips. Am J Surg.1958; 95: 223–226.
41.
SkoogT.Plastic Surgery: New Methods and Refinements.Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell;1974.
42.
SteinS.DunscheA.GellrichN.C.HarleF.JonasI.One- or two-stage palate closure in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: comparing cephalometric and occlusal outcomes. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2007; 44: 13–22.
43.
SullivanM.KarlssonJ.The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey III. Evaluation of criterion-based validity: results from normative population. J Clin Epidemiol.1998; 51: 1105–1113.
44.
SullivanM.KarlssonJ.WareJ.E.Jr. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey—I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med.1995; 41: 1349–1358.
45.
SullivanM.K.J.TaftC., eds. Hälsoenkät: Svensk Manual och Tolknings-guide, 2: a upplagan [Swedish Manual and Interpretation Guide, 2nd edition]. Gothenburg: Sahlgrenska University Hospital; 2002.
46.
ThomasP.T.TurnerS.R.RumseyN.DowellT.SandyJ.R.Satisfaction with facial appearance among subjects affected by a cleft. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1997; 34: 226–231.
47.
TobiasenJ.M.HiebertJ.M.Clefting and psychosocial adjustment: influence of facial aesthetics. Clin Plast Surg.1993; 20: 623–631.
48.
WardillW.E.M.The technique of operation for cleft palate. Br J Surg.1937; 25: 117–130.
49.
WareJ.E.KosinskiM.BaylissM.S.McHorneyC.A.RogersW.H.RaczekA.Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care.1995; 33: AS264–AS279.
50.
VeauV.Division Palatine.Paris: Masson et Cie;1931.
51.
WidmaierW.The primary elevated velum extension, a method of closing the cleft palate [in German]. Chirurg.1961; 32: 333–341.
