Study model sets of 75 infants with consecutive, nonsyndromic, complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (excluding Simonart bands) from 1995 to 2005.
Interventions
All patients (PSO group, n = 14; non-PSO group, n = 61) received lip repair/vomer flap at 3 months and soft palate repair at 6 months by the same consultant surgeon. The two groups were comparable at birth (p > .01) in all archform variables.
Main Outcome Measures
Sixteen variables were computed, following single-blinded analysis using the Reflex Microscope to describe the archform in the transverse, anteroposterior, and vertical dimensions and the arch circumference. Data were analyzed using a repeated-measures hierarchical analysis of variance with a significance level of 1%.
Results
Repeatability studies showed good measurement precision. Presurgical orthopedics produced no statistically significant mean change in any archform variable when compared with the non-PSO group. The difference in the mean reduction in the alveolar cleft width between the groups was 0.69 mm (95% confidence interval, −0.89 to 2.28 mm, p = .52). Lip repair produced greater change in archform than did presurgical orthopedics, reducing the mean alveolar cleft width by 4.45 mm (95% confidence interval, 3.53 to 5.37 mm; p < .001).
Conclusions
There was no evidence that presurgical orthopedics produced any significant effect on archform, raising questions for its continued use in this context. Lip repair had a greater impact on arch dimensions than did presurgical orthopedics.
Ashley-MontagueM.F.The form and dimensions of the palate of the newborn.Am J Orthod.1934; 29: 694–704.
2.
BallJ.V., DiBiaseD., SommerladB.C.Transverse maxillary arch changes with the use of preoperative orthopedics in unilateral cleft palate patients.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1995; 32: 483–488.
3.
BeamD., MildinhallS., MurphyT., MurrayJ.J., SellD., ShawW.C., WilliamsA.C., SandyJ.R.Cleft lip and palate care in the United Kingdom—the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) study. Part 4: outcome comparisons, training and conclusions.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2001; 38: 38–43.
4.
BhatiaS.N., HarrisonV.E.Operational performance of the travelling microscope in the measurement of dental casts.Br J Orthod.1987; 14: 147–153.
5.
BlandM., AltmanD.Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.Lancet.1986; 1: 58–61.
6.
BongaartsC.A.M., Kuijpers-JagtmanA.M., van't HofM.A., Prahl-AndersenB.The effect of infant orthopedics on the occlusion of the deciduous dentition in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (Dutchcleft).Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2004; 41: 633–641.
7.
BongaartsC.A.M., van't HofM.A., Prahl-AndersenB., DirksI.V., Kuijpers-JagtmanA.M.Infant orthopedics has no effect on maxillary arch dimensions in the deciduous dentition of children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (Dutchcleft).Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2006; 43: 665–672.
BraumannB., KeiligL., BourauelC., JägerA.Three-dimensional analysis of morphological changes in the maxilla of patients with cleft lip and palate.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2002; 39: 1–11.
10.
BurstonW.R.The early orthodontic treatment of cleft palate conditions.Dent Pract.1958; 9: 41–52.
DrageK.J., WinzarC.F., KillingbackN.Method errors recorded by inexperienced operators of the reflex microscope.Br J Orthod.1991; 18: 309–313.
13.
GraysonB., CuttingC.Presurgical nasoalveolar orthopedic molding in primary correction of the nose, lip and alveolus of infants born with unilateral and bilateral clefts.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2001; 38: 193–198.
14.
HuddartA.G.An evaluation of pre-surgical treatment.Br J Orthod.1974; 1: 21–25.
15.
KharbandaO.P., ShawW.C., WorthingtonH.Palatal height: another indicator of surgical outcome in unilateral cleft lip and palate?Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2002; 39: 308–311.
16.
KramerG.J.C., HoeksmaJ.B., Prahl-AndersenB.Palatal changes after lip surgery in different types of cleft lip and palate.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1994; 31: 376–384.
17.
KriensO.What Is a Cleft Lip and Palate? A Multidisciplinary Update.Germany: Thieme-Verlag;1989: 139–142.
18.
Kuijpers-JagtmanA.M., LongR.E.State of the art. The influence of surgery and orthopedic treatment on maxillofacial growth and maxillary arch development in patients treated for orofacial clefts.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2000; 37: 527-1–527-12.
19.
LathamR.A.Orthopedic advancement of the cleft maxillary segment: a preliminary report.Cleft Palate J.1980; 17: 227–233.
20.
LinL.I.A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.Biometrics.1989; 45: 255–268.
21.
LinL.I.Assay validation using the concordance correlation coefficient.Biometrics.1992; 48: 599–604.
22.
LongR.E., SembG., ShawW.C.Orthodontic treatment of the patient with complete clefts of lip, alveolus and palate: lessons of the past 60 years.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2000; 37: 533-1–533-13.
23.
LoweyM.N.The development of a new method of cephalometric and study cast mensuration with a computer controlled, video image capture system. Part II: study cast mensuration.Br J Orthod.1993; 20: 315–331.
24.
MasareiA.G., WadeA., MarsM., SommerladB.C., SellD.A randomized control trial investigating the effect of presurgical orthopedics on feeding in infants with cleft lip and palate.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2007; 44: 182–193.
25.
McNeilK.Orthodontic procedures in the treatment of congenital cleft palate.Dent Rec.1950; 70: 126–132.
26.
PeltomäkiT., VendittelliB.L., GraysonB.H., CuttingC.B., BrechtL.E.Associations between severity of clefting and maxillary growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated with infant orthopedics.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2001; 38: 582–586.
27.
Prahl-AndersenB.State of the art. Dental treatment of predental and infant patients with clefts and craniofacial anomalies.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2000; 37: 528–532.
28.
PrahlC., Kuijpers-JagtmanA.M., van't HofM.A., Prahl-AndersenB.A randomized prospective clinical trial into the effect of infant orthopedics on maxillary arch dimensions in unilateral cleft lip and palate (Dutchcleft).Eur J Oral Sci.2001; 109: 297–305.
29.
PrahlC., Kuijpers-JagtmanA.M., van't HofM.A., Prahl-AndersenB.A randomized prospective clinical trial of the effect of infant orthopedics in unilateral cleft lip and palate: prevention of collapse of the alveolar segments (Dutchcleft).Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2003; 40: 337–342.
30.
PruzanskyS.Factors determining arch form in clefts of the lip and palate.Am J Orthod.1955; 41: 827–851.
31.
Roberts-HarryD., SembG., HathornI., KillingbackN.Facial growth in patients with unilateral clefts of the lip and palate: a two-center study.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1996; 33: 489–493.
32.
RossR.B.Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Part 1: treatment affecting growth.Cleft Palate J.1987a; 24: 5–23.
33.
RossR.B.Treatment variables affecting facial growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Part 2: presurgical orthopedics.Cleft Palate J.1987b; 24: 33–44.
34.
ScottP.J.The reflex plotters: measurement without photographs.Photogrammetric Rec.1981; 10: 435–446.
35.
SeckelN.G., van der TweelI., ElemaG.A., SpeckenTFJMC. Landmark positioning on maxilla of cleft lip and palate infant—a reality?Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1995; 32: 434–441.
36.
ShawW.C.Early orthopaedic treatment of unilateral cleft lip and palate.Br J Orthod.1978; 5: 119–132.
37.
ShawW.C., Asher-McDadeC., BrattströmV., DahlE., McWilliamJ., MølstedK., PlintD.A., Prahl-AndersenB., SembG., TheR.P.S.A six-center international study of treatment outcomes in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: part 1: principles and study design.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1992; 29: 393–397.
38.
SpeculandB., ButcherG.W., StephensC.D.Three dimensional measurements: the accuracy and precision of the reflex microscope.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg.1988; 26: 276–283.
39.
UzelA., AlparslanN.Long-term effects of presurgical infant orthopedics in patients with cleft lip and palate: a systematic review.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. In press.
40.
WintersJ.C., HurwitzD.J.Presurgical orthopedics in surgical management of unilateral cleft lip and palate.Plast Reconstr Surg.1995; 95: 755–764.
