To determine whether psychosocial functioning in children with orofacial clefts and their parents differs from that in unaffected controls.
Design
The study used a nonrandomized, case-control design.
Participants
Outcomes were evaluated in 93 cases with orofacial clefts and 124 controls, aged 5 to 9 years, who were part of the Massachusetts Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention registry.
Main Outcome Measures
Measures included the Child Behavior Checklist, the PedsQL 4.0, the Social Competence Scale, and the Parenting Stress Inventory.
Results
Group differences were negligible for all measures, and findings changed little with the application of inverse probability weighting to adjust for response bias. Stratified analyses revealed differences according to both sex and age, with worse outcomes observed in male cases and cases aged 7 to 9 years.
Conclusions
In contrast to previous studies, we found minimal differences in psychosocial functioning among children with orofacial clefts and their parents compared with unaffected controls. This may reflect ascertainment factors, and psychosocial differences may be less apparent in population-based versus clinic-based samples. Alternatively, social-emotional deficits may become apparent in older school-aged children, making the preschool and early elementary school years an optimal time for preventive interventions.
AchenbachT.W.RescorlaL.A.Manual for the ASEBA Preschool Forms and Profiles.Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families;2000.
3.
AchenbachT.W.RescorlaL.A.Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms and Profiles.Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families;2001.
4.
BoesA.D.MurkoV.WoodJ.L.LangbehnD.R.CanadyJ.RichmanL.NopoulosP.Social function in boys with cleft lip and palate: relationship to ventral frontal cortex morphology. Behav Brain Res.2007; 181: 224–231.
5.
BrandS.BlechschmidtA.MullerA.SaderR.Schwenzer-ZimmererK.ZeilhoferF.Holsboer-TrachslerE.Psychosocial functioning and sleep patterns in children and adolescents with cleft lip and palate (CLP) compared with healthy controls. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2009; 46: 124–135.
6.
CollettB.R.SpeltzM.L.Social-emotional development of infants and young children with orofacial clefts. Infants Young Child.2006; 19: 262–291.
7.
Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group.Psychometric Properties of the Social Competence Scale—Teacher and Parent Ratings.University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University;2005. Fast Track Project Technical Report.
8.
CorriganA.Social Competence Scale—Parent Version, Grade 1/Year 2.2002. Available at http://www.fasttrackproject.org. Accessed January 5, 2010. Fast Track Project Technical Report.
9.
CroenL.A.ShawG.M.WassermanC.R.TolarovaM.M.Racial and ethnic variations in the prevalence of orofacial clefts in California, 1983–1992. Am J Med Genet.1998; 79: 42–47.
10.
DeRooL.A.GaudinoJ.A.EdmondsL.D.Orofacial cleft malformations: associations with maternal and infant characteristics in Washington State. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol.2003; 67: 637–642.
11.
ForresterM.B.MerzR.D.Descriptive epidemiology of oral clefts in a multiethnic population, Hawaii, 1986–2001. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2004; 41: 622–628.
12.
GouleyK.K.BrotmanL.M.HuangK.ShroutP.E.Construct validation of the social competence scale in preschool-age children. Social Development.2008; 17: 380–398.
13.
HedgesL.V.Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators. J Educ Stat.1981; 6: 107–128.
14.
HeytingA.TolboomJTBMEssersJ.G.A.Statistical handling of dropouts in longitudinal clinical trials. Stat Med.1992; 11: 2043–2061.
15.
HuntO.BurdenD.HepperP.JohnstonC.The psychosocial effects of cleft lip and palate: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod.2005; 27: 274–285.
16.
HuntO.BurdenD.HepperP.StevensonM.JohnstonC.Parent reports of the psychosocial functioning of children with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2007; 44: 304–311.
17.
HuntO.BurdenD.HepperP.StevensonM.JohnstonC.Self-reports of psychosocial functioning among children and young adults with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2006; 43: 598–605.
18.
LeonardB.J.BrustJ.D.AbrahamsG.SielaffB.Self-concept of children and adolescents with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1991; 28: 347–353.
19.
MurrayL.ArtecheA.BingleyC.HentgesF.BishopD.V.DaltonL.GoodacreT.HillJ. and The Cleft Lip and Palate Study Team. The effect of cleft lip on socio-emotional functioning in school-aged children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry.2010; 51: 94–103.
20.
PelchatD.RicardN.BouchardJ.M.PerreaultM.SaucierJ.F.BerthiaumeM.BissonJ.Adaptation of parents in relation to their 6-month old infant's type of disability. Child Care Health Dev.1999; 25: 377–397.
21.
PerssonM.AnianssonG.BeckerM.SvenssonH.Self-concept and introversion in adolescents with cleft lip and palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg.2002; 36: 24–27.
22.
RichmanL.C.MillardT.Brief report: cleft lip and palate: longitudinal behavior and relationships of cleft conditions to behavior and achievement. J Pediatr Psychol.1997; 4: 487–494.
23.
SameroffA.GutmanL.M.PeckS.C.Adaptation among youth facing multiple risks: prospective research findings. In: LutharS.S., ed. Resilience and Vulnerability: Adaptation in the Context of Childhood Adversities.New York: Cambridge University Press;2003: 364–391.
24.
SliferK.J.AmariA.DiverT.HilleyL.BeckM.KaneA.McDonnellS.Social interaction patterns of children and adolescents with and without oral clefts during a videotaped analogue social encounter. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2004; 41: 175–184.
25.
SpeltzM.L.ArmsdenG.C.ClarrenS.S.Effects of craniofacial birth defects on maternal functioning postinfancy. J Pediatr Psychol.1990; 15: 177–196.
26.
SpeltzM.L.EndrigaM.C.FisherP.A.MasonC.A.Early predictors of attachment in infants with cleft lip and/or palate. Child Dev.1997; 68: 12–25.
27.
SpeltzM.L.GreenbergM.T.EndrigaM.GalbreathH.Developmental approach to psychology of craniofacial anomalies. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1994; 31: 61–67.
28.
TurnerS.R.RumseyN.SandyJ.R.Psychological aspects of cleft lip and palate. Eur J Orthod.1998; 20: 407–415.
29.
VarniJ.W.SeidM.KurtinP.S.PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care.2001; 39: 800–812.
