To evaluate health-related quality of life among adults treated for unilateral cleft lip and palate and to investigate whether patients were affected differently depending on gender and age.
Design
Cross-sectional population study with long-term follow-up.
Patients/Settings
All unilateral cleft lip and palate patients born 1960–1987 and treated at Uppsala University Hospital were invited (n = 109). Response rate was 79% (n = 86). Mean follow-up time was 35 years. Norm data matched for age and gender were used for comparison (n = 1385).
Main Outcome Measures
Health-related quality of life measured with the SF-36 questionnaire. High values indicate good level of health-related quality of life.
Results
The total patient group had lower values in the Mental Health subscale compared with norm data (p = .005). Values in all other subscales did not differ from norm data. Women had a higher positive difference than men in the subscale emotional role function compared with the matched norm population (p < .001). The younger age group (20 to 32 years old) consistently had a larger negative difference to matched norm data compared with the older age group (33 to 47 years old) in the subscales social function (p = .009), physical role function (p < .001), and emotional role function (p < .001).
Conclusions
Unilateral cleft lip and palate affected health-related quality of life differently depending on gender and age of the patient. Younger patients were affected more negatively than older patients on several subscales. However, except for the mental health subscale, health-related quality of life was similar among unilateral cleft lip and palate patients and norm data.
åbyholmF.E., BerglandO., SembG.Secondary bone grafting of alveolar clefts. A surgical/orthodontic treatment enabling a non-prosthodontic rehabilitation in cleft lip and palate patients.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg.1981; 15: 127–140.
2.
BerscheidE., GangestadS.The social psychological implications of facial physical attractiveness.Clin Plast Surg.1982; 9: 289–296.
3.
BrandS., BlechschmidtA., MullerA., SaderR., Schwenzer-ZimmererK., ZeilhoferH.F., Holsboer-TrachslerE.Psychosocial functioning and sleep patterns in children and adolescents with cleft lip and palate (CLP) compared with healthy controls.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2009; 46: 124–135.
4.
BressmannT., SaderR., Ravens-SiebererU., ZeilhoferH.F., HorchH.H.Quality of life research in patients with cleft lip and palate: preliminary results [in German].Mund Kief er Gesichtschir.1999; 3: 134–139.
5.
BroderH., StraussR.P.Self-concept of early primary school age children with visible or invisible defects.Cleft Palate J.1989; 26: 114–117.
6.
BroderH.L., SmithF.B., StraussR.P.Effects of visible and invisible orofacial defects on self-perception and adjustment across developmental eras and gender.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1994; 31: 429–436.
7.
CheungL.K., LohJ.S., HoS.M.Psychological profile of Chinese with cleft lip and palate deformities.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2007; 44: 79–86.
8.
DaninoA., GradellJ., MalkaG., MoutelG., HerveC., RosilioC.Social adjustment in French adults from who had undergone standardised treatment of complete unilateral cleft lip and palate [in French].Ann Chir Plastique Esthet.2005; 50: 202–205.
9.
EdwardsT.C., PatrickD.L., TopolskiT.D., AspinallC.L., MouradianW.E., SpeltzM.L.Approaches to craniofacial-specific quality of life assessment in adolescents.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2005; 42: 19–24.
10.
EndrigaM.C., Kapp-SimonK.A.Psychological issues in craniofacial care: state of the art.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1999; 36: 3–11.
11.
FriedeH.Maxillary growth controversies after two-stage palatal repair with delayed hard palate closure in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients: perspectives from literature and personal experience.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2007; 44: 129–136.
12.
HellquistR., SvardstromK., PontenB.A longitudinal study of delayed periosteoplasty to the cleft alveolus.Cleft Palate J.1983; 20: 277–288.
13.
HuntO., BurdenD., HepperP., JohnstonC.The psychosocial effects of cleft lip and palate: a systematic review.Eur J Orthod.2005; 27: 274–285.
14.
JakobssonO.P., PontenB.Closure of the cleft palate in one or two stages: the surgical methods.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg.1990; 24: 149–155.
15.
JokovicA., LockerD., StephensM., KennyD., TompsonB., GuyattG.Validity and reliability of a questionnaire for measuring child oral-health-related quality of life.J Dent Res.2002; 81: 459–463.
16.
Kapp-SimonK.A.Psychological issues in cleft lip and palate.Clin Plast Surg.2004; 31: 347–352.
17.
LandsbergerP., ProffP., DietzeS., HoffmannA., KadukW., MeyerF.U., MackF.Evaluation of patient satisfaction after therapy of unilateral clefts of lip, alveolus, and palate.J Craniomaxillofac Surg.2006; 34(suppl 2): 31–33.
18.
MarcussonA., AkerlindI., PaulinG.Quality of life in adults with repaired complete cleft lip and palate.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2001a; 38: 379–385.
19.
MarcussonA., ListT., PaulinG., AkerlindI.Reliability of a multidimensional questionnaire for adults with treated complete cleft lip and palate.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg.2001b; 35: 271–278.
20.
MarcussonA., PaulinG., OstrupL.Facial appearance in adults who had cleft lip and palate treated in childhood.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg.2002; 36: 16–23.
21.
MarquisP., ChassanyO., AbetzL.A comprehensive strategy for the interpretation of quality-of-life data based on existing methods.Value Health.2004; 7: 93–104.
22.
McWilliamsB.J., ParadiseL.P.Educational, occupational, and marital status of cleft palate adults.Cleft Palate J.1973; 10: 223–229.
23.
NoorS.N., MusaS.Assessment of patients’ level of satisfaction with cleft treatment using the Cleft Evaluation Profile.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2007; 44: 292–303.
24.
OosterkampB.C., DijkstraP.U., RemmelinkH.J., van OortR.P., Goorhuis-BrouwerS.M., SandhamA., de BontL.G.Satisfaction with treatment outcome in bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg.2007; 36: 890–895.
25.
PatrickD.L., TopolskiT.D., EdwardsT.C., AspinallC.L., Kapp-SimonK.A., RumseyN.J., StraussR.P., ThomasC.R.Measuring the quality of life of youth with facial differences.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2007; 44: 538–547.
PerssonM., BeckerM., SvenssonH.Physical characteristics of young men with cleft lip, with or without cleft palate, and cleft palate only.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg.2007; 41: 6–9.
28.
PerssonM., BeckerM., SvenssonH.General intellectual capacity of young men with cleft lip with or without cleft palate and cleft palate alone.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg.2008; 42: 14–16.
29.
PeterJ.P., ChinskyR.R., FisherM.J.Sociological aspects of cleft palate adults. III. Vocational and economic aspects.Cleft Palate J.1975; 12: 193–199.
30.
RamstadT., OttemE., ShawW.C.Psychosocial adjustment in Norwegian adults who had undergone standardised treatment of complete cleft lip and palate. II. Self-reported problems and concerns with appearance.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg.1995; 29: 329–336.
31.
RichmanL.C., EliasonM.Psychological characteristics of children with cleft lip and palate: intellectual, achievement, behavioral, and personality variables.Cleft Palate J.1982; 19: 249–257.
32.
SinkoK., JagschR., PrechtlV., WatzingerF., HollmannK., BaumannA.Evaluation of esthetic, functional, and quality-of-life outcome in adult cleft lip and palate patients.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2005; 42: 355–361.
33.
SkoogT.A design for the repair of unilateral cleft lips.Am J Surg.1958; 95: 223–226.
34.
SkoogT.Plastic Surgery. New Methods and Refinements.Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell;1974.
35.
SullivanM., KarlssonJ.The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey III. Evaluation of criterion-based validity: results from normative population.J Clin Epidemiol.1998; 51: 1105–1113.
36.
SullivanM., KarlssonJ., WareJEJr.. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey—I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden.Soc Sci Med.1995; 41: 1349–1358.
37.
SullivanMk, TaftJ.C., (Ed.). Hälsoenkät: Svensk Manual och Tolkningsguide, 2: upplagan [Swedish Manual and Interpretation Guide].2nd ed.Gothenburg: Sahlgrenska University Hospital;2002.
38.
ThomasP.T., TurnerS.R., RumseyN., DowellT., SandyJ.R.Satisfaction with facial appearance among subjects affected by a cleft.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1997; 34: 226–231.
39.
ThompsonA., KentG.Adjusting to disfigurement: processes involved in dealing with being visibly different.Clin Psychol Rev.2001; 21: 663–682.
40.
TobiasenJ.M., HiebertJ.M.Clefting and psychosocial adjustment. Influence of facial aesthetics.Clin Plast Surg.1993; 20: 623–631.
41.
TurnerS.R., RumseyN., SandyJ.R.Psychological aspects of cleft lip and palate.Eur J Orthod.1998; 20: 407–415.
42.
WardillW.E.M.The technique of operation for cleft palate.Br J Surg.1937; 25: 117–130.
43.
WarschauskyS., KayJ.B., BuchmanS., HalbergA., BergerM.Health-related quality of life in children with craniofacial anomalies.Plast Reconstr Surg.2002; 110: 409–414, discussion 415–406.
44.
VeauV.Division palatine.Paris: Masson et Cie;1931.
45.
WidmaierW.The primary elevated velum extension, a method of closing the cleft palate [in German].Chirurg.1961; 32: 333–341.
46.
WyrwichK.W., BullingerM., AaronsonN., HaysR.D., PatrickD.L., SymondsT.Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes.Qual Life Res.2005; 14: 285–295.
