Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2006-3
Determination of Facial Symmetry in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients from Three-Dimensional Data: Technical Report and Assessment of Measurement Errors
To assess measurement errors of a novel technique for the three-dimensional determination of the degree of facial symmetry in patients suffering from unilateral cleft lip and palate malformations.
Design
Technical report, reliability study.
Setting
Cleft Lip and Palate Center of the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Patients
The three-dimensional facial surface data of five 10-year-old unilateral cleft lip and palate patients were subjected to the analysis. Distances, angles, surface areas, and volumes were assessed twice.
Main Outcome Measures
Calculations were made for method error, intraclass correlation coefficient, and repeatability of the measurements of distances, angles, surface areas, and volumes.
Results
The method errors were less than 1 mm for distances and less than 1.5° for angles. The intraclass correlation coefficients showed values greater than .90 for all parameters. The repeatability values were comparable for cleft and noncleft sides.
Conclusion
The small method errors, high intraclass correlation coefficients, and comparable repeatability values for cleft and noncleft sides reveal that the new technique is appropriate for clinical use.
AtackN.E., HathornI.S.H., SembG., DowellT., SandyJ.R.. A new index for assessing surgical outcome in unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects aged five: reproducibility and validity.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1997; 34: 242–246.
2.
BearnD.R., SandyJ.R., ShawW.C.. Cephalometric soft tissue profile in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients.Eur J Orthod.2002a; 24: 277–284.
3.
BearnD.R., SandyJ.R., ShawW.C.. Photogrammetric assessment of the soft tissue profile in unilateral cleft lip and palate.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2002b; 39: 597–603.
4.
BenzM., LaboureuxX., MaierT., NkenkeE., SeegerS., NeukamF.W., HauslerG.. The symmetry of faces. In: GreinerG., NiemannH., ErtlT., GirodB., SeidelH.P. (eds.). Vision, Modeling, and Visualization.Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2002; 332–339.
5.
BisharaS.E., BurkeyP.S., KharoufJ.G.. Dental and facial asymmetries: a review.Angle Orthod.1994; 64: 89–98.
BreitsprecherL., FanghanelJ., MetelmannH.R., MlynskiG., WurfelF., FreiseK., KnapeU.. The influence of the muscles of facial expression on the development of the midface and the nose in cleft lip and palate patients. A reflection of functional anatomy, facial esthetics and physiology of the nose.Anat Anz.1999; 181: 19–25.
9.
BurkeP.H.. Stereophotogrammetric measurement of normal facial asymmetry in children.Hum Biol.1971; 43: 536–548.
10.
BurkeP.H.. Growth of the soft tissues of the middle third of the face between 9 and 16 years.Eur J Orthod.1979; 1: 1–13.
11.
CoghlanB.A., MatthewsB., PigottR.W.. A computer-based method of measuring facial asymmetry. Results from an assessment of the repair of cleft lip deformities.Br J Plast Surg.1987; 40: 371–376.
12.
DahlbergG.. Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students.New York: Interscience Publications, 1940.
13.
FarkasL.G., CheungG.. Facial asymmetry in healthy North American Caucasians. An anthropometrical study.Angle Orthod.1981; 51: 70–77.
14.
FerrarioV.F., CiusaV., TartagliaG.M.. The effect of sex and age on facial asymmetry in healthy subjects: a cross-sectional study from adolescence to mid-adulthood.J Oral Maxillofac Surg.2001; 59: 382–388.
15.
FerrarioV.F., SforzaC., PoggioC.E., SchmitzJ.H.. Facial volume changes during normal human growth and development.Anat Rec.1998; 250: 480–487.
16.
FerrarioV.F., SforzaC., PoggioC.E., TartagliaG.M.. Distance from symmetry: a three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry.J Oral Maxillofac Surg.1994; 52: 1126–1132.
17.
FerrarioV.F., SforzaC., TartagliaG.M., SozziD., CaruA.. Three-dimensional lip morphometry in adults operated on for cleft lip and palate.Plast Reconstr Surg.2003; 111: 2149–2156.
18.
HäuslerG., GruberM.. Simple, robust and accurate phase measuring triangulation.Optik.1992; 89: 18–24.
19.
HoustonW.J.B.. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements.Am J Orthod.1983; 83: 382–390.
20.
HurwitzD.J., AshbyE.R., LlullR., PasqualJ., TaborC., GarrisonL., GillenJ., WeyantR.. Computer-assisted anthropometry for outcome assessment of cleft lip.Plast Reconstr Surg.1999; 103: 1608–1623.
21.
KaneA.A., PilgramT.K., MoshiriM., MarshJ.L.. Long-term outcome of cleft lip nasal reconstruction in childhood.Plast Reconstr Surg.2000; 105: 1600–1608.
22.
KoffE., BorodJ.C., StraussE.. Development of hemiface size asymmetry.Cortex.1985; 21: 153–156.
23.
KoffE., BorodJ.C., WhiteB.. Asymmetries for the hemiface size and mobility.Neuropsychologica.1981; 19: 825–830.
24.
LaitungJ.K., CoghlanB.A., PigottR.W.. A comparison of computer versus panel assessment of two groups of patients with cleft lip and palate.Br J Oral Surg.1993; 46: 18–22.
25.
MurphyT.C., WillmotD.R.. Image analysis of oronasal fistulas in cleft palate patients acquired with an intraoral camera.Plast Reconstr Surg.2005; 115: 31–37.
26.
NkenkeE., BenzM., MaierT., WiltfangJ., HolbachL.M., KramerM., HäuslerG., NeukamF.W.. Relative eno- and exophthalmometry in zygomatic fractures comparing optical non-contact, non-ionizing 3D imaging to the Hertel instrument and computed tomography.J Craniomaxillofac Surg.2003a; 31: 362–368.
27.
NkenkeE., LangerA., LaboureuxX., BenzM., MaierT., KramerM., HäuslerG., KesslerP., WiltfangJ., NeukamF.W.. Validation of in vivo assessment of facial soft tissue volume changes and clinical application in midfacial distraction: a technical report.Plast Reconstr Surg.2003b; 112: 367–380.
RasF., HabetsLLMF, Van GinkelF.C., Prahl-AndersenB.. Facial left-right dominance in cleft lip and palate: three-dimensional evaluation.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1994a; 31: 461–465.
31.
RasF., HabetsLLMF, Van GinkelF.C., Prahl-AndersenB.. Three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry in cleft lip and palate.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1994b; 31: 116–121.
32.
RasF., HabetsLLMF, Van GinkelF.C., Prahl-AndersenB.. Logitudinal study on three-dimensional changes of facial asymmetry in children between 4 to 12 years of age with unilateral cleft lip and palate.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1995; 32: 463–468.
33.
RobertsC.T., SembG., ShawW.C.. Strategies for the advancement of surgical methods in cleft lip and palate.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1991; 28: 141–149.
34.
RussellK.A., WaldmanS.D., LeeJ.M.. Video-imaging assessment of nasal morphology in individuals with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2000; 37: 542–550.
35.
RussellK.A., WaldmanS.D., TompsonB., LeeJ.M.. Nasal morphology and shape parameters as predictors of nasal esthetics in individuals with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2001; 38: 476–485.
36.
SandlerP.J.. Reproducibility of cephalometric measurements.Br J Orthod.1988; 15: 105–110.
37.
ShahS.M., JoshiM.R.. An assessment of asymmetry in the normal craniofacial complex.Angle Orthod.1978; 48: 141–148.
38.
TanK.K., PigottR.W.. A morbidity review of children with complete unilateral cleft lip nose at 10 + 1 years of age.Br J Plast Surg.1993; 46: 1–6.
39.
YamadaT., MoriY., MinamiK., MishimaK., SugaharaT.. Three-dimensional facial morphology following cleft lip repair using the triangular flap with or without rotation advancement.J Craniomaxillofac Surg.2002; 30: 337–342.
