van BogerijenGHAuricchioFContiM. Aortic hemodynamics after thoracic endovascular aortic repair, with particular attention to the bird-beak configuration. J Endovasc Ther. 2014;21:791–802.
3.
LeeJJD'AnconaGAmaducciA. Role of computational modeling in thoracic aortic pathology: a review. J Card Surg. 2014;29:653–662.
4.
NrgaardBLLeipsicJGaurS. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1145–1155.
5.
PastaSChoJSDurO. Computer modeling for the prediction of thoracic aortic stent graft collapse. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57:1353–1361.
6.
LamSKFungGSChengSW. A computational study on the biomechanical factors related to stent-graft models in the thoracic aorta. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2008;46:1129–1138.
7.
KasirajanKDakeMDLumsdenA. Incidence and outcomes after infolding or collapse of thoracic stent grafts. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55:652–658.
8.
LeungDADavisIKatlapsG. Treatment of infolding related to the Gore TAG thoracic endoprosthesis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19:600–605.
9.
FarberMAGigliaJSStarnesBW. Evaluation of the redesigned conformable GORE TAG thoracic endoprosthesis for traumatic aortic transection. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58:651–658.
