LairdJRKatzenBTScheinertD. Nitinol stent implantation versus
balloon angioplasty for lesions in the superficial femoral artery and
proximal popliteal artery: twelve-month results from the RESILIENT
randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv.
2010;3:267–76.
2.
ScheinertDGrummtLPiorkowskiM. A novel self-expanding interwoven
nitinol stent for complex femoropopliteal lesions: 24-month results of the
SUPERA SFA registry. J Endovasc Ther.
2011;18:745–752.
3.
SchulteKLKraljIGisslerHM. MISAGO 2: one-year outcomes after
implantation of the Misago self-expanding nitinol stent in the superficial
femoral and popliteal arteries of 744 patients. J
Endovasc Ther.
2012;19:774–784.
4.
BosiersMTorselloGGisslerHM. Nitinol stent implantation in long
superficial femoral artery lesions: 12-month results of the DURABILITY I
study. J Endovasc Ther.
2009;16:261–269.
5.
ChalmersNWalkerPTBelliA-M. Randomized trial of the SMART stent
versus balloon angioplasty in long superficial femoral artery lesions: the
SUPER study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol.
2012;36:353–361.
6.
BosiersMDelooseKCallaertJ. Results of the Protégé
EverFlex 200-mm-long nitinol stent (ev3) in TASC C and D femoropopliteal
lesions. J Vasc Surg.
2011;54:1042–1050.
7.
YeoKKMalikULairdJR.
Outcomes following treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent
restenosis: a single center experience. Catheter
Cardiovasc Interv.
2011;78:604–608.
8.
DickPSabetiSMlekuschW. Conventional balloon angioplasty
versus peripheral cutting balloon angioplasty for treatment of
femoropopliteal artery in-stent restenosis: initial
experience. Radiology.
2008;248:297–302.
9.
ZellerTRastanASixtS. Long-term results after directional
atherectomy of femoropopliteal lesions. J Am Coll
Cardiol.
2006;48:1573–1578.
10.
LairdJRYeoKKRocha-SinghK. Excimer laser with adjunctive balloon
angioplasty and heparin-coated self-expanding stent grafts for the treatment
of femoropopliteal artery in-stent restenosis: twelve-month results from the
SALVAGE study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv.
2012;80:852–859.
11.
DakeMDScheinertDTepeG; Zilver PTX Single-Arm Study
Investigators. Nitinol stents with polymer-free
paclitaxel coating for lesions in the superficial femoral and popliteal
arteries above the knee: twelve-month safety and effectiveness results from
the Zilver PTX single-arm clinical study. J Endovasc
Ther.
2011;18:613–623.
12.
HabaraSMitsudoKKadotaK. Effectiveness of paclitaxel-eluting
balloon catheter in patients with sirolimus-eluting stent
restenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv.
2011;4:149–154.
13.
UnverdorbenMVallbrachtCCremersB. Paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter
versus paclitaxel-coated stent for the treatment of coronary in-stent
restenosis. Circulation.
2009;119:2986–2994.
14.
MicariACioppaAVadalaG. Clinical evaluation of a
paclitaxel-eluting balloon for treatment of femoropopliteal arterial
disease: 12-month results from a multicenter Italian
registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv.
2012;5:331–338.
15.
TepeGZellerTAlbrechtT. Local delivery of paclitaxel to
inhibit restenosis during angioplasty of the leg. N
Engl J Med.
2008;358:689–699.
16.
WerkMLangnerSReinkensmeierB. Inhibition of restenosis in
femoropopliteal arteries: paclitaxel-coated versus uncoated balloon: femoral
paclitaxel randomized pilot trial.
Circulation.
2008;118:1358–1365.
17.
StabileEVirgaVSalemmeL. Drugeluting balloon for treatment of
superficial femoral artery in-stent restenosis. J Am
Coll Cardiol.
2012;60:1739–1742.
18.
LiistroFAngioliPPortoI. Paclitaxeleluting balloon vs.
standard angioplasty to reduce recurrent restenosis in diabetic patients
with in-stent restenosis of the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal
arteries: the DEBATE-ISR study. J Endovasc
Ther.
2014;21:1–8.
19.
TosakaASogaYIidaO. Classification and clinical impact of
restenosis after femoropopliteal stenting. J Am Coll
Cardiol.
2012;59:16–23.
20.
ArmstrongEJSinghSSinghGD. Angiographic characteristics of
femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis: association with long-term outcomes
after endovascular intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc
Interv.
2013;82:1168–1174.
21.
McCoachCEArmstrongEJSinghS. Gender-related variation in the
presentation and outcomes of critical limb ischemia.
Vasc Med.
2013;18:19–26.