ZellerTKambaraAMMoreiraSMRecanalization of femoropopliteal chronic total occlusions using
the ENABLER-P Balloon Catheter System. J Endovasc
Ther.
2012;19:131–139
2.
DiehmNPattynamaPMJaffMRClinical endpoints in peripheral endovascular revascularization
trials: a case for standardized definitions. Eur J
Vasc Endovasc Surg.
2008;36:409–419
3.
BoliaAMilesKABrennanJPercutaneous transluminal angioplasty of occlusions of the
femoral and popliteal arteries by subintimal dissection.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol.
1990;13:357–363
4.
LondonNJSrinivasanRNaylorARSubintimal angioplasty of femoropopliteal artery occlusions: the
long-term results. Eur J Vasc Surg.
1994;8:148–155
5.
BausbackYBotsiosSFluxJOutback catheter for femoropopliteal occlusions: immediate and
long-term results. J Endovasc Ther.
2011;18:13–21
6.
HauseggerKAGeorgievaBPortugallerHThe Outback catheter: a new device for true lumen re-entry after
dissection during recanalization of arterial occlusions.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol.
2004;27:26–30
7.
WiesingerBSteinkampHKönigCTechnical report and preliminary clinical data of a novel
catheter for luminal re-entry after subintimal dissection.
Invest Radiol.
2005;40:725–728
8.
BeschornerUSixtSSchwarzwälderURecanalization of chronic occlusions of the superficial femoral
artery using the Outback re-entry catheter: a single centre
experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv.
2009;74:934–938
9.
SetacciCChisciEde
DonatoGSubintimal angioplasty with the aid of a re-entry device for TASC
C and D lesions of the SFA. Eur J Vasc Endovasc
Surg.
2009;38:76–87
10.
AartsFBlankensteijnJDvan
der VlietJASubintimal angioplasty of supra- and infrageni-culate
arteries. Ann Vasc Surg.
2006;20:620–624
11.
AntusevasAAleksynasNKaupasRSComparison of results of subintimal angioplasty and percutaneous
transluminal angioplasty in superficial femoral artery
occlusions. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg.
2008;36:101–106
12.
Berengoltz-ZlochinSNMaliWPBorstCSubintimal versus intraluminal laser-assisted recanalization of
occluded femoropopliteal arteries: one-year clinical and angiographic
follow-up. J Vasc Interv Radiol.
1994;5:689–696
MetRVan
LiendenKPKoelemayMJSubintimal angioplasty for peripheral arterial occlusive disease:
a systematic review. Cardiovasc Intervent
Radiol.
2008;31:687–697
21.
AdamDJBeardJDClevelandTBASIL trial participants, bypass versus angioplasty in severe
ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): multi-centre, randomised controlled
trial. Lancet.
2005;366:1925–1934
22.
BradburyAW.Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischemia of the leg (BASIL)
trial: what are its implications?Semin Vasc Surg.
2009;22:267–274
23.
SultanSHynesN.Five-year Irish trial of CLI patients with TASC II type C/D
lesions undergoing subintimal angioplasty or bypass surgery based on plaque
echolucency. J Endovasc Ther.
2009;16:270–283
24.
KoYGKimJSChoiDHImproved technical success and midterm patency with subintimal
angioplasty compared to intraluminal angioplasty in long femoropopliteal
occlusions. J Endovasc Ther.
2007;14:374–381
25.
KöcherMCernaMUtikalPSubintimal angioplasty in femoropopliteal region-Midterm
results. Eur J Radiol.
2010;73:672–676
26.
LandryGJ.Functional outcome of critical limb ischemia.
J Vasc Surg.
2007;45:141A–148A
27.
TaylorSMYorkJWCullDLClinical success using patient-oriented outcome measures after
lower extremity bypass and endovascular intervention for ischemic tissue
loss. J Vasc Surg.
2009;50:534–541